Integrating frailty and acute illness severity scoring for risk stratification in acute geriatric care: Review and practical guide.

Mae-Jane Khaw, Wei-Ven Chin
{"title":"Integrating frailty and acute illness severity scoring for risk stratification in acute geriatric care: Review and practical guide.","authors":"Mae-Jane Khaw, Wei-Ven Chin","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.120866","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Managing acute illness in older populations remains a major challenge because of the complex interplay between multimorbidity and reduced physiological reserve. While conventional acute severity scores (<i>e.g.</i>, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, and National Early Warning Score) track acute physiological derangements, they often fail to capture the biological heterogeneity seen in geriatric patients. Frailty provides a vital window into the baseline vulnerability of a patient, yet it remains underutilized in acute triage despite its established prognostic value. Current evidence demonstrates that integrating frailty measures, specifically the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), with existing severity scores significantly improves mortality prediction and risk stratification in emergency and critical care. This mini-review explores age-related physiological changes as well as the prognostic limitations of standard severity scores while evaluating their integration with validated frailty tools. To bridge current clinical gaps, we propose a practical 4-step clinical triage algorithm integrating a baseline \"Two-Week Rule\" CFS with acute severity scores <i>via</i> a synergistic 2 × 2 risk stratification matrix. By identifying distinct clinical phenotypes, this framework guides precise, person-centered triage, ensuring that treatment escalation and critical care interventions remain medically proportionate to an older adult's attainable functional recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"15 3","pages":"120866"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548159/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.120866","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing acute illness in older populations remains a major challenge because of the complex interplay between multimorbidity and reduced physiological reserve. While conventional acute severity scores (e.g., Sequential Organ Failure Assessment, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation, and National Early Warning Score) track acute physiological derangements, they often fail to capture the biological heterogeneity seen in geriatric patients. Frailty provides a vital window into the baseline vulnerability of a patient, yet it remains underutilized in acute triage despite its established prognostic value. Current evidence demonstrates that integrating frailty measures, specifically the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), with existing severity scores significantly improves mortality prediction and risk stratification in emergency and critical care. This mini-review explores age-related physiological changes as well as the prognostic limitations of standard severity scores while evaluating their integration with validated frailty tools. To bridge current clinical gaps, we propose a practical 4-step clinical triage algorithm integrating a baseline "Two-Week Rule" CFS with acute severity scores via a synergistic 2 × 2 risk stratification matrix. By identifying distinct clinical phenotypes, this framework guides precise, person-centered triage, ensuring that treatment escalation and critical care interventions remain medically proportionate to an older adult's attainable functional recovery.

综合虚弱和急性疾病严重程度评分的风险分层在急性老年护理:回顾和实用指南。
管理老年人的急性疾病仍然是一项重大挑战,因为多发病和生理储备减少之间存在复杂的相互作用。虽然传统的急性严重程度评分(例如顺序器官衰竭评估、急性生理和慢性健康评估以及国家早期预警评分)追踪急性生理紊乱,但它们往往无法捕捉到老年患者的生物学异质性。虚弱提供了一个重要的窗口到一个病人的基线脆弱性,然而,它仍然未充分利用急性分诊,尽管其建立的预后价值。目前的证据表明,将虚弱措施,特别是临床虚弱量表(CFS)与现有的严重程度评分相结合,可显著改善急诊和重症监护的死亡率预测和风险分层。这篇小型综述探讨了与年龄相关的生理变化以及标准严重程度评分的预后局限性,同时评估了它们与经过验证的衰弱工具的整合。为了弥补目前的临床差距,我们提出了一个实用的4步临床分诊算法,通过一个协同的2 × 2风险分层矩阵,将基线“两周规则”CFS与急性严重程度评分结合起来。通过识别不同的临床表型,该框架指导精确的、以人为中心的分诊,确保治疗升级和重症监护干预措施在医学上与老年人可实现的功能恢复成比例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书