Relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness as a potential contributor to sperm DNA fragmentation: a hypothesis-driven narrative review and proposal of the FERTILE framework.

IF 1.7
Frontiers in urology Pub Date : 2026-08-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fruro.2026.1915445
Hussein Kandil
{"title":"Relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness as a potential contributor to sperm DNA fragmentation: a hypothesis-driven narrative review and proposal of the FERTILE framework.","authors":"Hussein Kandil","doi":"10.3389/fruro.2026.1915445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with impaired fertility, adverse reproductive outcomes, and an increased risk of miscarriage. Although oxidative stress is considered the predominant contributor to SDF, accumulating evidence suggests that abnormalities arising during spermatogenesis may also influence sperm DNA integrity. However, whether relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness contributes to SDF has not been directly investigated.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the biological plausibility that relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness may contribute to SDF and to propose a multidimensional research framework for future biological investigation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A hypothesis-driven narrative review was conducted using experimental, translational, and clinical evidence addressing FSH signaling, Sertoli-cell biology, spermatogenesis, SDF, pharmacogenetics, and FSH-based therapeutic interventions. Relevant literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to June 1, 2026.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Available evidence suggests that circulating FSH concentrations may not accurately reflect effective intratesticular FSH action. Human associative studies, pharmacogenetic findings, and mechanistic experimental evidence collectively support the biological plausibility that inter-individual variation in effective FSH signaling may influence Sertoli-cell support of germ-cell maturation, chromatin remodeling, and cellular quality-control mechanisms. Although direct clinical evidence remains limited, these observations suggest that relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness could contribute to defective chromatin packaging, persistence of DNA damage, and increased susceptibility to SDF in selected men. To facilitate future investigation of this hypothesis, the FERTILE framework is proposed as a seven-domain conceptual model integrating FSH and effective intratesticular signaling, endocrine markers, receptor and ligand genetics, testicular structure, inflammation and oxidative stress, lifestyle and environmental factors, and evaluation of DNA integrity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness represents a biologically plausible but currently unproven contributor to elevated SDF. The proposed FERTILE framework is intended as a conceptual research tool for biological stratification and hypothesis generation rather than a clinical decision-making instrument. Prospective studies incorporating endocrine profiling, pharmacogenetic characterization, standardized SDF assessment, and direct or validated surrogate measures of Sertoli-cell responsiveness are required to determine whether relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness has independent clinical relevance for sperm DNA integrity and reproductive outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":73113,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in urology","volume":"6 ","pages":"1915445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547001/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fruro.2026.1915445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sperm DNA fragmentation (SDF) is associated with impaired fertility, adverse reproductive outcomes, and an increased risk of miscarriage. Although oxidative stress is considered the predominant contributor to SDF, accumulating evidence suggests that abnormalities arising during spermatogenesis may also influence sperm DNA integrity. However, whether relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness contributes to SDF has not been directly investigated.

Objective: To evaluate the biological plausibility that relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness may contribute to SDF and to propose a multidimensional research framework for future biological investigation.

Methods: A hypothesis-driven narrative review was conducted using experimental, translational, and clinical evidence addressing FSH signaling, Sertoli-cell biology, spermatogenesis, SDF, pharmacogenetics, and FSH-based therapeutic interventions. Relevant literature was identified through structured searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase up to June 1, 2026.

Results: Available evidence suggests that circulating FSH concentrations may not accurately reflect effective intratesticular FSH action. Human associative studies, pharmacogenetic findings, and mechanistic experimental evidence collectively support the biological plausibility that inter-individual variation in effective FSH signaling may influence Sertoli-cell support of germ-cell maturation, chromatin remodeling, and cellular quality-control mechanisms. Although direct clinical evidence remains limited, these observations suggest that relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness could contribute to defective chromatin packaging, persistence of DNA damage, and increased susceptibility to SDF in selected men. To facilitate future investigation of this hypothesis, the FERTILE framework is proposed as a seven-domain conceptual model integrating FSH and effective intratesticular signaling, endocrine markers, receptor and ligand genetics, testicular structure, inflammation and oxidative stress, lifestyle and environmental factors, and evaluation of DNA integrity.

Conclusions: Relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness represents a biologically plausible but currently unproven contributor to elevated SDF. The proposed FERTILE framework is intended as a conceptual research tool for biological stratification and hypothesis generation rather than a clinical decision-making instrument. Prospective studies incorporating endocrine profiling, pharmacogenetic characterization, standardized SDF assessment, and direct or validated surrogate measures of Sertoli-cell responsiveness are required to determine whether relative Sertoli-cell FSH hyporesponsiveness has independent clinical relevance for sperm DNA integrity and reproductive outcomes.

相对支持细胞FSH低反应性作为精子DNA断裂的潜在贡献者:一个假设驱动的叙述回顾和对肥沃框架的建议。
背景:精子DNA断裂(SDF)与生育能力受损、不良生殖结局和流产风险增加有关。虽然氧化应激被认为是SDF的主要因素,但越来越多的证据表明,精子发生过程中出现的异常也可能影响精子DNA的完整性。然而,是否相对支持细胞FSH低反应性有助于SDF尚未直接调查。目的:评价支持细胞FSH反应性相对低下可能导致SDF的生物学合理性,并为未来的生物学研究提出一个多维研究框架。方法:采用实验、转化和临床证据对FSH信号、支持细胞生物学、精子发生、SDF、药物遗传学和基于FSH的治疗干预进行假设驱动的叙述性回顾。截至2026年6月1日,通过PubMed、Scopus和Embase的结构化检索确定相关文献。结果:现有证据表明,循环FSH浓度可能不能准确反映睾丸内FSH的有效作用。人类相关研究、药理学发现和机械实验证据共同支持了有效FSH信号的个体间差异可能影响生殖细胞成熟、染色质重塑和细胞质量控制机制的支持的生物学合理性。尽管直接的临床证据仍然有限,但这些观察结果表明,相对的支持细胞FSH反应性低下可能导致染色质包装缺陷、DNA损伤的持久性以及特定男性对SDF的易感性增加。为了促进对这一假设的进一步研究,我们提出了一个包含FSH和有效睾丸内信号、内分泌标记物、受体和配体遗传学、睾丸结构、炎症和氧化应激、生活方式和环境因素以及DNA完整性评估的七域概念模型。结论:相对支持细胞FSH反应性低下是SDF升高的生物学原因,但目前尚未得到证实。拟议的沃夫框架旨在作为生物学分层和假设生成的概念性研究工具,而不是临床决策工具。需要前瞻性研究,包括内分泌分析、药理学表征、标准化SDF评估和直接或验证的替代方法,以确定相对sertoli -细胞FSH低反应性是否与精子DNA完整性和生殖结果具有独立的临床相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书