Impact of nurse empowerment for early adrenaline administration for in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A pre-post intervention study.

Binila Chacko, Anju Susan Jacob, Lovely Thomas, Anitha L, Staney Arul Selvan John, Anisha Elizabeth Sanghi, Nixon Raja P, Shoma Vinay Rao, Debasis Das Adhikari, Sophia Vijayananthan, Esther Agnes Anita, Amala V, Bijesh Yadav, John V Peter
{"title":"Impact of nurse empowerment for early adrenaline administration for in-hospital cardiac arrest resuscitation: A pre-post intervention study.","authors":"Binila Chacko, Anju Susan Jacob, Lovely Thomas, Anitha L, Staney Arul Selvan John, Anisha Elizabeth Sanghi, Nixon Raja P, Shoma Vinay Rao, Debasis Das Adhikari, Sophia Vijayananthan, Esther Agnes Anita, Amala V, Bijesh Yadav, John V Peter","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.119122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely administration of adrenaline during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with non-shockable rhythms is recommended, yet delays are common when drug administration depends on physician authorisation.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate whether empowering nurses to administer the first dose of adrenaline could reduce delays and improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study of prospectively collected registry data, the primary outcome of time to first dose of adrenaline in IHCA events with non-shockable rhythms (asystole/pulseless electrical activity) was compared between the pre-intervention phase (September 1, 2018 to November 26, 2019), when adrenaline administration was physician-led, and the post-intervention phase (November 27, 2019 to December 31, 2021), when nurse-led administration of adrenaline without physician order was implemented. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to ROSC, 24-hour survival, and survival to discharge. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for factors associated with ROSC and whether timely adrenaline administration (defined as within 2-minutes) was independently associated with ROSC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 450 IHCA events, 162 occurred in the pre-intervention and 288 in the post- intervention period. The mean (standard deviation) age was 52.5 (16.1) years; 63.1% were male. Timely adrenaline administration improved from 46% in the pre-intervention period to 74.3% (<i>P</i> < 0.001) in the post-intervention period, reducing the median (interquartile range) time to first dose from 4 (1-6) minutes to 2 (0-3) minutes (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Although this did not improve ROSC rates, pre-post intervention (56.8% <i>vs</i> 58.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.74), ROSC was achieved faster (<i>P</i> < 0.001) in the post-intervention period when compared with the pre-intervention period. Combining pre- and post-intervention data, timely adrenaline administration when compared with delayed administration was associated with shorter time to ROSC (<i>P</i> = 0.006) but did not improve survival. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, shorter time to Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Team arrival and identification of a reversible cause were independently associated with ROSC, whereas the time to first dose of adrenaline was not.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nurse-led early adrenaline administration during IHCA significantly reduced treatment delays and enhanced resuscitation efficiency, though it did not translate to reduced hospital mortality. This model is feasible in low- and middle-income settings and underscores the value of system-level empowerment to improve IHCA care.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"15 3","pages":"119122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548174/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.119122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely administration of adrenaline during in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) with non-shockable rhythms is recommended, yet delays are common when drug administration depends on physician authorisation.

Aim: To evaluate whether empowering nurses to administer the first dose of adrenaline could reduce delays and improve outcomes.

Methods: In this study of prospectively collected registry data, the primary outcome of time to first dose of adrenaline in IHCA events with non-shockable rhythms (asystole/pulseless electrical activity) was compared between the pre-intervention phase (September 1, 2018 to November 26, 2019), when adrenaline administration was physician-led, and the post-intervention phase (November 27, 2019 to December 31, 2021), when nurse-led administration of adrenaline without physician order was implemented. Secondary outcomes included return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), time to ROSC, 24-hour survival, and survival to discharge. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for factors associated with ROSC and whether timely adrenaline administration (defined as within 2-minutes) was independently associated with ROSC.

Results: Among 450 IHCA events, 162 occurred in the pre-intervention and 288 in the post- intervention period. The mean (standard deviation) age was 52.5 (16.1) years; 63.1% were male. Timely adrenaline administration improved from 46% in the pre-intervention period to 74.3% (P < 0.001) in the post-intervention period, reducing the median (interquartile range) time to first dose from 4 (1-6) minutes to 2 (0-3) minutes (P < 0.001). Although this did not improve ROSC rates, pre-post intervention (56.8% vs 58.3%, P = 0.74), ROSC was achieved faster (P < 0.001) in the post-intervention period when compared with the pre-intervention period. Combining pre- and post-intervention data, timely adrenaline administration when compared with delayed administration was associated with shorter time to ROSC (P = 0.006) but did not improve survival. On multivariate logistic regression analysis, shorter time to Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation Team arrival and identification of a reversible cause were independently associated with ROSC, whereas the time to first dose of adrenaline was not.

Conclusion: Nurse-led early adrenaline administration during IHCA significantly reduced treatment delays and enhanced resuscitation efficiency, though it did not translate to reduced hospital mortality. This model is feasible in low- and middle-income settings and underscores the value of system-level empowerment to improve IHCA care.

护士赋权对院内心脏骤停复苏早期肾上腺素管理的影响:干预前后研究。
背景:建议在医院内心脏骤停(IHCA)伴有非震荡节律时及时给药肾上腺素,但当药物给药取决于医生批准时,延迟是常见的。目的:评估是否授权护士管理肾上腺素的第一剂可以减少延误和改善结果。方法:在这项前瞻性收集登记数据的研究中,比较了干预前阶段(2018年9月1日至2019年11月26日)和干预后阶段(2019年11月27日至2021年12月31日)的主要结局,即具有非震荡节律的IHCA事件(心搏停止/无脉性电活动)中肾上腺素的首次剂量时间,其中肾上腺素的给药是由医生主导的,干预后阶段(2019年11月27日至2021年12月31日)是由护士主导的,没有医生的命令。次要结局包括自发循环恢复(ROSC)、到达ROSC的时间、24小时生存和存活至出院。进行Logistic回归分析以评估与ROSC相关的因素以及及时肾上腺素给药(定义为2分钟内)是否与ROSC独立相关。结果:450例IHCA事件中,干预前发生162例,干预后288例。平均(标准差)年龄为52.5(16.1)岁;63.1%为男性。肾上腺素及时给药率从干预前的46%提高到干预后的74.3% (P < 0.001),将首次给药的中位时间(四分位数间距)从4(1-6)分钟缩短到2(0-3)分钟(P < 0.001)。虽然这并没有提高ROSC率,但干预前(56.8% vs 58.3%, P = 0.74),与干预前相比,干预后的ROSC实现得更快(P < 0.001)。结合干预前和干预后的数据,与延迟给药相比,及时给肾上腺素与更短的ROSC时间相关(P = 0.006),但并没有提高生存率。在多变量logistic回归分析中,较短的到达心脏骤停和复苏小组的时间和可逆原因的确定与ROSC独立相关,而到第一次剂量肾上腺素的时间与ROSC无关。结论:在IHCA期间,护士主导的早期肾上腺素管理显著减少了治疗延误,提高了复苏效率,尽管它并没有转化为降低住院死亡率。这种模式在低收入和中等收入环境中是可行的,并强调了系统层面赋权对改善IHCA护理的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书