{"title":"Global trends and inequalities in disability wellbeing research: A bibliometric analysis (2019-2025).","authors":"Paula Morales Almeida, Pedro Alemán Ramos","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wellbeing has become an increasingly important focus of disability research as the field has shifted from deficit-oriented biomedical models toward multidimensional, biopsychosocial, and health equity frameworks. However, the rapid growth of disability wellbeing research makes it increasingly difficult to identify dominant themes, emerging priorities, and knowledge gaps.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to analyse global scientific production on wellbeing among people with disabilities between 2019 and 2025.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE, SSCI, ESCI). Publications were identified through a structured search strategy combining disability-related terms in the Title field and wellbeing-related terms in the Topic field. Bibliometric performance analysis and science mapping were conducted using Bibliometrix (R). Analyses included publication trends, leading journals, countries, institutions, collaboration networks, author keyword co-occurrence, strategic thematic mapping, and Bradford's and Lotka's distributions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8944 publications were identified, with an annual growth rate of 12.91%. Scientific production was concentrated in high-income countries, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada. Quality of life emerged as the dominant conceptual theme, accompanied by mental health, rehabilitation, and participation, while social inclusion, digital health, and health equity represented emerging research topics. Important gaps remained regarding Global South representation, intersectionality, and policy-oriented disability research.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Disability wellbeing research is characterised by sustained scientific growth and increasing conceptual diversification. Nevertheless, persistent geographic and conceptual imbalances highlight the need for more globally representative, inclusive, and policy-oriented research to advance disability health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"102169"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2026.102169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Wellbeing has become an increasingly important focus of disability research as the field has shifted from deficit-oriented biomedical models toward multidimensional, biopsychosocial, and health equity frameworks. However, the rapid growth of disability wellbeing research makes it increasingly difficult to identify dominant themes, emerging priorities, and knowledge gaps.
Objective: This study aimed to analyse global scientific production on wellbeing among people with disabilities between 2019 and 2025.
Methods: A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the Web of Science Core Collection (SCIE, SSCI, ESCI). Publications were identified through a structured search strategy combining disability-related terms in the Title field and wellbeing-related terms in the Topic field. Bibliometric performance analysis and science mapping were conducted using Bibliometrix (R). Analyses included publication trends, leading journals, countries, institutions, collaboration networks, author keyword co-occurrence, strategic thematic mapping, and Bradford's and Lotka's distributions.
Results: A total of 8944 publications were identified, with an annual growth rate of 12.91%. Scientific production was concentrated in high-income countries, particularly the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, and Canada. Quality of life emerged as the dominant conceptual theme, accompanied by mental health, rehabilitation, and participation, while social inclusion, digital health, and health equity represented emerging research topics. Important gaps remained regarding Global South representation, intersectionality, and policy-oriented disability research.
Conclusions: Disability wellbeing research is characterised by sustained scientific growth and increasing conceptual diversification. Nevertheless, persistent geographic and conceptual imbalances highlight the need for more globally representative, inclusive, and policy-oriented research to advance disability health equity.
期刊介绍：
Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include:
• Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health
• Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature
• Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs
• Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
