Ultrasound examination during labor - a prospective pilot comparative study of clinical and ultrasonographic accuracy.

IF 0.7 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lucia Borovska, Jozef Záhumenský, Peter Papcun, Rastislav Dudič, Peter Urdzik
{"title":"Ultrasound examination during labor - a prospective pilot comparative study of clinical and ultrasonographic accuracy.","authors":"Lucia Borovska, Jozef Záhumenský, Peter Papcun, Rastislav Dudič, Peter Urdzik","doi":"10.48095/cccg2026285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital vaginal examination versus intrapartum ultrasound (IUS) during the first and second stages of labor in women with cephalic presentation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, L. Pasteur University Hospital in Košice. The cohort included parturients (regardless of parity) with regular uterine contractions, cephalic presentation, and ruptured membranes. To ensure high data quality, all ultrasound examinations were performed by senior obstetricians with at least 8 years of clinical experience. Examining obstetricians were blinded to each other's findings. The assessment focused on fetal position, head position, head station, and progression during labor. IUS included a transabdominal approach (head position) and a transperineal approach, measuring head-perineum distance and angle of progression. In cases of discrepancy, the ultrasound finding was considered the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included. Agreement between IUS and VE across all parameters was observed in 27 cases (57%). Discrepancies were noted in 20 patients (43%), with the most frequent errors occurring in the assessment of fetal head position. The statistical superiority of ultrasound over digital examination was highly significant (P < 0.0001). Presence of a caput succedaneum was a major confounding factor, which was present in 45% of non-correlated cases. The caesarean section rate in the cohort was 21% (N = 10).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While vaginal examination remains the global gold standard in routine obstetrics, it is inherently subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. Our findings suggest that intrapartum ultrasound provides a more objective, accurate, and reproducible assessment. Incorporating IUS into labor management may reduce the need for frequent digital examinations, potentially lowering the risk of chorioamnionitis and enhancing patient comfort while optimizing clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":43333,"journal":{"name":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","volume":"91 4","pages":"285-289"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48095/cccg2026285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy of digital vaginal examination versus intrapartum ultrasound (IUS) during the first and second stages of labor in women with cephalic presentation.

Materials and methods: This prospective comparative study was conducted at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, L. Pasteur University Hospital in Košice. The cohort included parturients (regardless of parity) with regular uterine contractions, cephalic presentation, and ruptured membranes. To ensure high data quality, all ultrasound examinations were performed by senior obstetricians with at least 8 years of clinical experience. Examining obstetricians were blinded to each other's findings. The assessment focused on fetal position, head position, head station, and progression during labor. IUS included a transabdominal approach (head position) and a transperineal approach, measuring head-perineum distance and angle of progression. In cases of discrepancy, the ultrasound finding was considered the reference standard.

Results: A total of 47 patients were included. Agreement between IUS and VE across all parameters was observed in 27 cases (57%). Discrepancies were noted in 20 patients (43%), with the most frequent errors occurring in the assessment of fetal head position. The statistical superiority of ultrasound over digital examination was highly significant (P < 0.0001). Presence of a caput succedaneum was a major confounding factor, which was present in 45% of non-correlated cases. The caesarean section rate in the cohort was 21% (N = 10).

Conclusion: While vaginal examination remains the global gold standard in routine obstetrics, it is inherently subjective and prone to inter-observer variability. Our findings suggest that intrapartum ultrasound provides a more objective, accurate, and reproducible assessment. Incorporating IUS into labor management may reduce the need for frequent digital examinations, potentially lowering the risk of chorioamnionitis and enhancing patient comfort while optimizing clinical decision-making.

产程超声检查-临床和超声准确性的前瞻性先导比较研究。
目的:本初步研究的目的是评估和比较数字阴道检查与产中超声(IUS)在头位产妇第一和第二产程的诊断准确性。材料和方法:本前瞻性比较研究在Košice的L. Pasteur大学医院妇产科进行。该队列包括有规律子宫收缩、头侧表现和胎膜破裂的孕妇(不论胎次)。为确保数据质量,所有超声检查均由具有至少8年临床经验的高级产科医生进行。产科医生对彼此的检查结果一无所知。评估的重点是胎儿体位、头位、头位和产程。IUS包括经腹入路(头位)和经会阴入路,测量头-会阴距离和进展角度。在不一致的情况下,超声检查结果被认为是参考标准。结果:共纳入47例患者。27例(57%)患者IUS和VE在所有参数上一致。20例患者(43%)出现差异,其中最常见的错误发生在胎儿头部位置的评估。超声检查相对于数字检查的统计学优势非常显著(P < 0.0001)。头盖骨继位是一个主要的混杂因素,在45%的非相关病例中出现。该队列的剖腹产率为21% (N = 10)。结论:虽然阴道检查仍然是常规产科的全球金标准,但它本身是主观的,容易在观察者之间发生变化。我们的研究结果表明,产时超声提供了更客观、准确和可重复的评估。将IUS纳入分娩管理可以减少频繁的数字检查的需要,潜在地降低绒毛膜羊膜炎的风险,提高患者的舒适度,同时优化临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology
Ceska Gynekologie-Czech Gynaecology OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书