Spinal manipulation in acute low back pain patients is associated with reduced motor-unit firing variability without altering bilateral coordination: a single-motor-unit EMG study of the lumbar multifidus.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Lise R Lothe, Tim J L Raven, Gunnar Sandbæk, Torsten Eken
{"title":"Spinal manipulation in acute low back pain patients is associated with reduced motor-unit firing variability without altering bilateral coordination: a single-motor-unit EMG study of the lumbar multifidus.","authors":"Lise R Lothe, Tim J L Raven, Gunnar Sandbæk, Torsten Eken","doi":"10.1186/s12998-026-00664-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The neurophysiology of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) is poorly understood. We have characterized motor unit (MU) discharge in acute low back pain (ALBP) patients after spinal manipulation and compared with pre-manipulation findings in the same subjects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fine-wire electrodes were implanted bilaterally into the deep lumbar multifidus muscle at the painful spinal level in 9 ALBP patients with pain of less than three weeks duration in March-April 2007. HVLA-SM was applied to the painful spinal level. EMG activity was recorded during manipulation and during spontaneous and voluntary force production while standing and sitting, and individual MUs were identified and their discharge characteristics described. All subjects were compared to their own data recorded before HVLA-SM for effects on gross EMG activity duration, MU discharge rate, interspike interval variability quantified as inter-quartile range for differences between consecutive inter-spike intervals (∆ISI IQR), and common drive coefficient between concurrently active MUs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No effects on MU discharge rate were evident in the first seconds after HVLA-SM. ∆ISI IQR was reduced by 5.25 ms (95% confidence interval 0.68-9.82; P = 0.025) after spinal manipulation compared with pre-manipulation findings, while median MU discharge rate and total duration of gross activity remained unchanged. Notably, the common drive coefficient was lower for bilateral than unilateral MU pairs (- 0.149; 95% confidence interval - 0.087 to - 0.210; P < 0.0001). This is in agreement with findings in the same ALBP population before HVLA-SM and in contrast to previous findings during spontaneous standing in pain free subjects, where common drive to uni- and bilateral pairs was not significantly different. MUs showed signs of self-sustained firing, but rotation between units was not observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We have established a methodological framework for future investigations using spontaneous muscle activity rather than forced movements to understand the influence of spinal manipulation on the role of the nervous system in postural support. HVLA-SM was associated with reduced MU firing variability, suggesting a shift toward more stable motoneuron output in the deep lumbar multifidus. Longitudinal recovery data are needed to discriminate whether the reduced common drive to bilateral muscle pairs represents a pre-existing trait or a pain-driven state.</p>","PeriodicalId":48572,"journal":{"name":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548485/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chiropractic & Manual Therapies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12998-026-00664-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The neurophysiology of high velocity, low amplitude spinal manipulation (HVLA-SM) is poorly understood. We have characterized motor unit (MU) discharge in acute low back pain (ALBP) patients after spinal manipulation and compared with pre-manipulation findings in the same subjects.

Methods: Fine-wire electrodes were implanted bilaterally into the deep lumbar multifidus muscle at the painful spinal level in 9 ALBP patients with pain of less than three weeks duration in March-April 2007. HVLA-SM was applied to the painful spinal level. EMG activity was recorded during manipulation and during spontaneous and voluntary force production while standing and sitting, and individual MUs were identified and their discharge characteristics described. All subjects were compared to their own data recorded before HVLA-SM for effects on gross EMG activity duration, MU discharge rate, interspike interval variability quantified as inter-quartile range for differences between consecutive inter-spike intervals (∆ISI IQR), and common drive coefficient between concurrently active MUs.

Results: No effects on MU discharge rate were evident in the first seconds after HVLA-SM. ∆ISI IQR was reduced by 5.25 ms (95% confidence interval 0.68-9.82; P = 0.025) after spinal manipulation compared with pre-manipulation findings, while median MU discharge rate and total duration of gross activity remained unchanged. Notably, the common drive coefficient was lower for bilateral than unilateral MU pairs (- 0.149; 95% confidence interval - 0.087 to - 0.210; P < 0.0001). This is in agreement with findings in the same ALBP population before HVLA-SM and in contrast to previous findings during spontaneous standing in pain free subjects, where common drive to uni- and bilateral pairs was not significantly different. MUs showed signs of self-sustained firing, but rotation between units was not observed.

Conclusions: We have established a methodological framework for future investigations using spontaneous muscle activity rather than forced movements to understand the influence of spinal manipulation on the role of the nervous system in postural support. HVLA-SM was associated with reduced MU firing variability, suggesting a shift toward more stable motoneuron output in the deep lumbar multifidus. Longitudinal recovery data are needed to discriminate whether the reduced common drive to bilateral muscle pairs represents a pre-existing trait or a pain-driven state.

急性腰痛患者的脊柱操作与减少运动单元发射变异性相关,而不改变双侧协调:腰椎多裂肌的单运动单元肌电图研究。
背景:高速低幅度脊柱推拿(hvlasm)的神经生理学尚不清楚。我们对急性腰痛(ALBP)患者在脊柱操作后的运动单元(MU)放电进行了特征分析,并与同一受试者的操作前结果进行了比较。方法:于2007年3 - 4月对9例疼痛持续时间少于3周的ALBP患者,在腰深多裂肌双侧疼痛水平植入细丝电极。HVLA-SM应用于疼痛脊柱水平。记录操作过程中以及站立和坐着时自发和自愿发力时的肌电图活动,并识别单个mu并描述其放电特征。将所有受试者与hvra - sm前记录的数据进行比较,以观察对总肌电活动持续时间、MU放电率、连续峰间间隔差异的四分位数范围(∆ISI IQR)以及同时活动的MU之间的共同驱动系数的影响。结果:HVLA-SM术后1秒内对MU排出率无明显影响。与推拿前相比,脊柱推拿后,∆ISI IQR减少5.25 ms(95%可信区间0.68-9.82;P = 0.025),而MU中位放电率和总活动时间保持不变。值得注意的是,双侧MU对的共同驱动系数低于单侧MU对(- 0.149;95%可信区间- 0.087至- 0.210;P)结论:我们已经建立了一个方法学框架,用于未来的研究,使用自发肌肉活动而不是强迫运动来了解脊柱操作对神经系统在姿势支持中的作用的影响。HVLA-SM与MU放电变异性降低相关,提示深腰椎多裂肌向更稳定的运动神经元输出转移。需要纵向恢复数据来区分双侧肌肉对共同驱动的减少是代表预先存在的特征还是疼痛驱动的状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies Medicine-Complementary and Alternative Medicine
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
48
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Chiropractic & Manual Therapies publishes manuscripts on all aspects of evidence-based information that is clinically relevant to chiropractors, manual therapists and related health care professionals. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies is an open access journal that aims to provide chiropractors, manual therapists and related health professionals with clinically relevant, evidence-based information. Chiropractic and other manual therapies share a relatively broad diagnostic practice and treatment scope, emphasizing the structure and function of the body''s musculoskeletal framework (especially the spine). The practices of chiropractic and manual therapies are closely associated with treatments including manipulation, which is a key intervention. The range of services provided can also include massage, mobilisation, physical therapies, dry needling, lifestyle and dietary counselling, plus a variety of other associated therapeutic and rehabilitation approaches. Chiropractic & Manual Therapies continues to serve as a critical resource in this field, and as an open access publication, is more readily available to practitioners, researchers and clinicians worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书