Delirium in the oncology intensive care unit: Risk, recognition, and recovery strategies.

Prashant Sirohiya, Prateek Maurya, Nishkarsh Gupta, Saurabh Vig, Balbir Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit
{"title":"Delirium in the oncology intensive care unit: Risk, recognition, and recovery strategies.","authors":"Prashant Sirohiya, Prateek Maurya, Nishkarsh Gupta, Saurabh Vig, Balbir Kumar, Brajesh Kumar Ratre, Raghav Gupta, Shweta Bhopale, Anuja Pandit","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.114792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Delirium represents a severe neurological complication with exceptionally high prevalence in oncology intensive care units (ICU), affecting up to 88% of terminal cancer patients. This acute brain dysfunction emerges from the convergence of critical illness factors with cancer-specific vulnerabilities, creating unique management challenges. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on delirium epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, management strategies, and long-term cognitive outcomes specific to critically ill cancer patients. Delirium demonstrates a profound prognostic impact, increasing ICU mortality odds tenfold and hospital mortality sixfold. Patients experiencing delirium are nearly four times more likely to have cancer treatment modified or discontinued, directly affecting survival. Risk factors unique to this population include chemotherapy neurotoxicity, central nervous system malignancy, paraneoplastic syndromes, and complex medication regimens. While screening tools show strong performance in general ICU settings, validation in cancer populations remains limited. Evidence strongly supports non-pharmacologic multicomponent interventions over pharmacologic approaches, with early mobilization reducing delirium risk by 47%. Long-term cognitive impairment represents a devastating legacy, creating a double burden when superimposed on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Management requires specialized preventive approaches prioritizing brain protection through systematic screening, multicomponent prevention bundles, and integrated palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":"15 3","pages":"114792"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.114792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Delirium represents a severe neurological complication with exceptionally high prevalence in oncology intensive care units (ICU), affecting up to 88% of terminal cancer patients. This acute brain dysfunction emerges from the convergence of critical illness factors with cancer-specific vulnerabilities, creating unique management challenges. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on delirium epidemiology, risk factors, diagnostic challenges, management strategies, and long-term cognitive outcomes specific to critically ill cancer patients. Delirium demonstrates a profound prognostic impact, increasing ICU mortality odds tenfold and hospital mortality sixfold. Patients experiencing delirium are nearly four times more likely to have cancer treatment modified or discontinued, directly affecting survival. Risk factors unique to this population include chemotherapy neurotoxicity, central nervous system malignancy, paraneoplastic syndromes, and complex medication regimens. While screening tools show strong performance in general ICU settings, validation in cancer populations remains limited. Evidence strongly supports non-pharmacologic multicomponent interventions over pharmacologic approaches, with early mobilization reducing delirium risk by 47%. Long-term cognitive impairment represents a devastating legacy, creating a double burden when superimposed on chemotherapy-related cognitive dysfunction. Management requires specialized preventive approaches prioritizing brain protection through systematic screening, multicomponent prevention bundles, and integrated palliative care.

肿瘤重症监护室的谵妄:风险、识别和恢复策略。
谵妄是一种严重的神经系统并发症,在肿瘤重症监护病房(ICU)发病率极高,影响高达88%的晚期癌症患者。这种急性脑功能障碍来自于癌症特定脆弱性的关键疾病因素的融合,创造了独特的管理挑战。这篇叙述性综述综合了目前关于谵妄流行病学、危险因素、诊断挑战、管理策略和危重癌症患者长期认知结果的证据。谵妄表现出深刻的预后影响,使ICU死亡率增加10倍,医院死亡率增加6倍。经历谵妄的患者有近四倍的可能性改变或停止癌症治疗,直接影响生存。该人群特有的危险因素包括化疗神经毒性、中枢神经系统恶性肿瘤、副肿瘤综合征和复杂的药物治疗方案。虽然筛查工具在普通ICU环境中表现出色,但在癌症人群中的有效性仍然有限。证据强烈支持非药物多组分干预优于药物干预,早期动员可将谵妄风险降低47%。长期认知障碍是一种毁灭性的遗产,当与化疗相关的认知功能障碍叠加时,会造成双重负担。管理需要专门的预防方法,通过系统筛查、多组分预防包和综合姑息治疗来优先考虑脑保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书