[Impact of recipient age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an analysis from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Group (CBMTRG)].
X L Liang, J Liu, L Xuan, Y Sun, J Chen, J Liu, H X Fu, C C Wang, S Y Lu, L P Xu, X Q Wang, R H Huang, D P Wu, D H Liu, Q F Liu, X Zhang, X J Huang
{"title":"[Impact of recipient age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an analysis from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Group (CBMTRG)].","authors":"X L Liang, J Liu, L Xuan, Y Sun, J Chen, J Liu, H X Fu, C C Wang, S Y Lu, L P Xu, X Q Wang, R H Huang, D P Wu, D H Liu, Q F Liu, X Zhang, X J Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20260324-00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate whether recipient age independently affects outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), including the predominant patterns of treatment failure, after adjustment for confounding factors. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 1 619 patients who underwent a single allo-HSCT at five transplant centers from January 1 2018, to December 31 2023. Patients were categorized into younger (≤35 years) or older recipient groups (≥50 years). After propensity score matching to balance 11 covariates, the analysis included 694 patients (347 in each group). Overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD) were compared between the groups. <b>Results:</b> The median follow-up was 33.4 months (95% <i>CI</i>: 31.2 - 36.1 months). The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in older than in younger recipients (75.5% ± 2.5% <i>vs</i> 83.1% ± 2.2%, <i>HR</i>=1.59, <i>P</i>=0.007). The 3-year NRM was higher in older recipients [13.3% ± 1.9% <i>vs</i> 8.5% ± 1.6%, univariable subdistribution <i>HR</i> (<i>SHR</i>) =1.61, <i>P</i>=0.044]. This association did not reach conventional statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (adjusted <i>SHR</i>=1.59, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.99 - 2.54, <i>P</i>=0.053) ; however, the stable effect estimate indicated clinical relevance. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in CIR or in the cumulative incidences of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD. Infection was the leading cause of NRM in both groups, whereas the proportions of deaths attributable to organ dysfunction and bleeding were higher among older recipients. <b>Conclusion:</b> After propensity score matching, older recipient age remained independently associated with poorer OS. This unfavorable outcome was primarily characterized by an increased risk of NRM, rather than that of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"47 7","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20260324-00150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether recipient age independently affects outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), including the predominant patterns of treatment failure, after adjustment for confounding factors. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 1 619 patients who underwent a single allo-HSCT at five transplant centers from January 1 2018, to December 31 2023. Patients were categorized into younger (≤35 years) or older recipient groups (≥50 years). After propensity score matching to balance 11 covariates, the analysis included 694 patients (347 in each group). Overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD) were compared between the groups. Results: The median follow-up was 33.4 months (95% CI: 31.2 - 36.1 months). The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in older than in younger recipients (75.5% ± 2.5% vs 83.1% ± 2.2%, HR=1.59, P=0.007). The 3-year NRM was higher in older recipients [13.3% ± 1.9% vs 8.5% ± 1.6%, univariable subdistribution HR (SHR) =1.61, P=0.044]. This association did not reach conventional statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (adjusted SHR=1.59, 95% CI: 0.99 - 2.54, P=0.053) ; however, the stable effect estimate indicated clinical relevance. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in CIR or in the cumulative incidences of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD. Infection was the leading cause of NRM in both groups, whereas the proportions of deaths attributable to organ dysfunction and bleeding were higher among older recipients. Conclusion: After propensity score matching, older recipient age remained independently associated with poorer OS. This unfavorable outcome was primarily characterized by an increased risk of NRM, rather than that of relapse.