[Impact of recipient age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an analysis from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Group (CBMTRG)].

Q3 Medicine
X L Liang, J Liu, L Xuan, Y Sun, J Chen, J Liu, H X Fu, C C Wang, S Y Lu, L P Xu, X Q Wang, R H Huang, D P Wu, D H Liu, Q F Liu, X Zhang, X J Huang
{"title":"[Impact of recipient age on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an analysis from the Chinese Bone Marrow Transplant Registry Group (CBMTRG)].","authors":"X L Liang, J Liu, L Xuan, Y Sun, J Chen, J Liu, H X Fu, C C Wang, S Y Lu, L P Xu, X Q Wang, R H Huang, D P Wu, D H Liu, Q F Liu, X Zhang, X J Huang","doi":"10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20260324-00150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> To investigate whether recipient age independently affects outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), including the predominant patterns of treatment failure, after adjustment for confounding factors. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 1 619 patients who underwent a single allo-HSCT at five transplant centers from January 1 2018, to December 31 2023. Patients were categorized into younger (≤35 years) or older recipient groups (≥50 years). After propensity score matching to balance 11 covariates, the analysis included 694 patients (347 in each group). Overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD) were compared between the groups. <b>Results:</b> The median follow-up was 33.4 months (95% <i>CI</i>: 31.2 - 36.1 months). The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in older than in younger recipients (75.5% ± 2.5% <i>vs</i> 83.1% ± 2.2%, <i>HR</i>=1.59, <i>P</i>=0.007). The 3-year NRM was higher in older recipients [13.3% ± 1.9% <i>vs</i> 8.5% ± 1.6%, univariable subdistribution <i>HR</i> (<i>SHR</i>) =1.61, <i>P</i>=0.044]. This association did not reach conventional statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (adjusted <i>SHR</i>=1.59, 95% <i>CI</i>: 0.99 - 2.54, <i>P</i>=0.053) ; however, the stable effect estimate indicated clinical relevance. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in CIR or in the cumulative incidences of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD. Infection was the leading cause of NRM in both groups, whereas the proportions of deaths attributable to organ dysfunction and bleeding were higher among older recipients. <b>Conclusion:</b> After propensity score matching, older recipient age remained independently associated with poorer OS. This unfavorable outcome was primarily characterized by an increased risk of NRM, rather than that of relapse.</p>","PeriodicalId":24016,"journal":{"name":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","volume":"47 7","pages":"626-634"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13575514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121090-20260324-00150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate whether recipient age independently affects outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT), including the predominant patterns of treatment failure, after adjustment for confounding factors. Methods: This retrospective, multicenter cohort study included 1 619 patients who underwent a single allo-HSCT at five transplant centers from January 1 2018, to December 31 2023. Patients were categorized into younger (≤35 years) or older recipient groups (≥50 years). After propensity score matching to balance 11 covariates, the analysis included 694 patients (347 in each group). Overall survival (OS), non-relapse mortality (NRM), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR), and cumulative incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD and cGVHD) were compared between the groups. Results: The median follow-up was 33.4 months (95% CI: 31.2 - 36.1 months). The 3-year OS rate was significantly lower in older than in younger recipients (75.5% ± 2.5% vs 83.1% ± 2.2%, HR=1.59, P=0.007). The 3-year NRM was higher in older recipients [13.3% ± 1.9% vs 8.5% ± 1.6%, univariable subdistribution HR (SHR) =1.61, P=0.044]. This association did not reach conventional statistical significance after multivariable adjustment (adjusted SHR=1.59, 95% CI: 0.99 - 2.54, P=0.053) ; however, the stable effect estimate indicated clinical relevance. No statistically significant between-group differences were observed in CIR or in the cumulative incidences of grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD. Infection was the leading cause of NRM in both groups, whereas the proportions of deaths attributable to organ dysfunction and bleeding were higher among older recipients. Conclusion: After propensity score matching, older recipient age remained independently associated with poorer OS. This unfavorable outcome was primarily characterized by an increased risk of NRM, rather than that of relapse.

[受体年龄对同种异体造血干细胞移植结果的影响:来自中国骨髓移植登记组(CBMTRG)的分析]。
目的:在调整混杂因素后,探讨受体年龄是否独立影响同种异体造血干细胞移植(allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, alloo - hsct)的预后,包括治疗失败的主要模式。方法:这项回顾性、多中心队列研究纳入了2018年1月1日至2023年12月31日在五个移植中心接受单次同种异体造血干细胞移植的1619例患者。患者分为年轻组(≤35岁)和老年组(≥50岁)。在倾向评分匹配平衡11个协变量后,分析纳入694例患者(每组347例)。比较两组患者的总生存率(OS)、非复发死亡率(NRM)、累积复发率(CIR)以及急性和慢性移植物抗宿主病(aGVHD和cGVHD)的累积发病率。结果:中位随访时间为33.4个月(95% CI: 31.2 - 36.1个月)。老年患者的3年OS率明显低于年轻患者(75.5%±2.5% vs 83.1%±2.2%,HR=1.59, P=0.007)。老年受者3年NRM较高[13.3%±1.9% vs 8.5%±1.6%,单变量亚分布HR (SHR) =1.61, P=0.044]。经多变量调整后,该相关性未达到常规统计学意义(调整后SHR=1.59, 95% CI: 0.99 - 2.54, P=0.053);然而,稳定的效果估计显示了临床相关性。在CIR或Ⅱ-Ⅳ级aGVHD和cGVHD的累积发病率方面,组间无统计学差异。感染是两组NRM的主要原因,而在老年受者中,器官功能障碍和出血导致的死亡比例更高。结论:倾向评分匹配后,年龄较大的受者仍与较差的OS独立相关。这一不利结果的主要特征是NRM的风险增加,而不是复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
100
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书