Patients 40 Years of Age or Older Have Comparable Return to Sport Rates, Reinjury Rates, and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes After Medial or Lateral Meniscus Repair Compared With Patients Younger Than 40 Years of Age.

Q3 Medicine
Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2026-09-06 eCollection Date: 2026-10-01 DOI:10.1002/ars2.70071
Alexander E White, Tyler J Uppstrom, Akshay K Raghuram, Thun Itthipanichpong, Samarth V Menta, Robert B Baldwin, Shu-Han Wang, Anil S Ranawat
{"title":"Patients 40 Years of Age or Older Have Comparable Return to Sport Rates, Reinjury Rates, and 2-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes After Medial or Lateral Meniscus Repair Compared With Patients Younger Than 40 Years of Age.","authors":"Alexander E White, Tyler J Uppstrom, Akshay K Raghuram, Thun Itthipanichpong, Samarth V Menta, Robert B Baldwin, Shu-Han Wang, Anil S Ranawat","doi":"10.1002/ars2.70071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare patient-reported outcomes, return to sport (RTS), and reinjury rates after meniscus repair in patients over and under the age of 40 years old.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Meniscus repair cases performed at a single tertiary care center between December 2010 and August 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up data were reviewed. Patient-reported outcome measures, RTS, and reinjury data were obtained from an institutional knee registry and prospective surveys. Patients were classified as (1) <40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (2) ≥40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (3) <40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and (4) ≥40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred thirty patients were included, 91 were <40 years old and 39 were ≥40 years old (56% men). Of the tears, 66.2% (n = 86) were medial, 26.9% (n = 35) were lateral, and 6.9% (n = 9) were both medial and lateral. In patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee scores (<i>P</i> = .58), RTS (<i>P</i> = .80), or meniscus repair failure rates (<i>P</i> > .99) between different age groups. In isolated meniscus repairs, there were no statistically significant differences in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee scores (<i>P</i> = .72), RTS (<i>P</i> = .24), or meniscus repair failure rates (<i>P</i> = .54) between age groups. At 2-year follow-up, over 80% of patients in both age groups achieved the minimum clinically important difference across all patient-reported outcomes, with no significant differences in minimum clinically important difference achievement between patients younger than 40 years and those aged 40 years or older.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we found that patients 40 years or older who undergo meniscus repair experience similar 2-year patient-reported outcome measures, RTS, and failure rates compared with patients younger than 40.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Level III, retrospective comparative study.</p>","PeriodicalId":34631,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"e70071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13546857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy Sports Medicine and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ars2.70071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To compare patient-reported outcomes, return to sport (RTS), and reinjury rates after meniscus repair in patients over and under the age of 40 years old.

Methods: Meniscus repair cases performed at a single tertiary care center between December 2010 and August 2021 with a minimum 2-year follow-up data were reviewed. Patient-reported outcome measures, RTS, and reinjury data were obtained from an institutional knee registry and prospective surveys. Patients were classified as (1) <40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (2) ≥40 years old with isolated meniscus repair, (3) <40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, and (4) ≥40 years old with meniscus repair and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Results: One hundred thirty patients were included, 91 were <40 years old and 39 were ≥40 years old (56% men). Of the tears, 66.2% (n = 86) were medial, 26.9% (n = 35) were lateral, and 6.9% (n = 9) were both medial and lateral. In patients with concomitant anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there were no statistically significant differences in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee scores (P = .58), RTS (P = .80), or meniscus repair failure rates (P > .99) between different age groups. In isolated meniscus repairs, there were no statistically significant differences in 2-year International Knee Documentation Committee scores (P = .72), RTS (P = .24), or meniscus repair failure rates (P = .54) between age groups. At 2-year follow-up, over 80% of patients in both age groups achieved the minimum clinically important difference across all patient-reported outcomes, with no significant differences in minimum clinically important difference achievement between patients younger than 40 years and those aged 40 years or older.

Conclusions: In this study, we found that patients 40 years or older who undergo meniscus repair experience similar 2-year patient-reported outcome measures, RTS, and failure rates compared with patients younger than 40.

Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

与年龄小于40岁的患者相比,40岁或以上的患者在内侧或外侧半月板修复后的运动恢复率、再损伤率和2年患者报告的结果相当。
目的:比较40岁以上和40岁以下患者半月板修复后患者报告的结果、重返运动(RTS)和再损伤率。方法:回顾2010年12月至2021年8月在单一三级保健中心进行的半月板修复病例,并进行至少2年的随访数据。患者报告的结果测量、RTS和再损伤数据来自机构膝关节登记和前瞻性调查。结果:纳入患者130例,其中P = 91例。58), RTS (p =。80),或半月板修复失败率(P < 0.99)。在孤立的半月板修复中,2年国际膝关节文献委员会评分无统计学意义差异(P =。72), RTS (p =。24),或半月板修复失败率(P = 0.54)。在2年的随访中,两个年龄组中超过80%的患者在所有患者报告的结果中达到了最小临床重要差异,40岁以下的患者和40岁以上的患者在最小临床重要差异方面没有显著差异。结论:在这项研究中,我们发现40岁或以上接受半月板修复的患者与40岁以下患者相比,2年患者报告的结果测量、RTS和失败率相似。证据等级:III级,回顾性比较研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
218
审稿时长
45 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书