Towards practical radiopharmaceutical treatment planning: a review of dosimetry simplification techniques.

IF 14.9 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Theranostics Pub Date : 2026-08-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.7150/thno.132538
Elmira Yazdani, Zahra Mansouri, Yazdan Salimi, Habib Zaidi
{"title":"Towards practical radiopharmaceutical treatment planning: a review of dosimetry simplification techniques.","authors":"Elmira Yazdani, Zahra Mansouri, Yazdan Salimi, Habib Zaidi","doi":"10.7150/thno.132538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) plays an important role in modern precision oncology. However, treatment activity is still prescribed by fixed-dose protocols rather than adjusted to planned patient-specific absorbed dose (AD). Individualized dosimetry holds promise for improving treatment planning but is not yet standard. One main reason is that present dosimetry workflows depend on repeated imaging at multiple time points and require kinetic modeling and computational modeling. This review covers recent approaches to make dosimetry more practical and easier to use in everyday RPT workflows. We introduce a theoretical framework in which simplification methods, which help ease the clinical burden of dosimetry, are classified into three related categories. The first two categories simplify the process through direct reduction in the burdens of either the acquisition or processing of data: (1) Methodological simplifications through reduction in the imaging burden, such as reduced- or single-time point (STP) imaging; and (2) Computational automation via artificial intelligence (AI) to automate dosimetry, including image processing, segmentation, registration, and AD estimation. Advanced modeling strategies in the third category improve efficiency through inference, thereby enabling estimation of AD from sparsely sampled data. Reduced imaging played a major role in defining these areas. While all of these have their promise, every category of methods has certain drawbacks. STP techniques are less reliable for heterogeneous tumors, black box models have poor transferability and explainability, and digital twin/physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (DT/PBPK) models lack clinical validation. Fundamental dosimetry, with appropriate validity conditions, could allow for reduced reliance on imaging skills and expertise while still retaining sufficient precision for its intended purposes. Standardization of imaging and multicenter analysis is essential for wider adoption of RPTs. A detailed description of models and their effectiveness would be helpful in the clinical application of dosimetry.</p>","PeriodicalId":22932,"journal":{"name":"Theranostics","volume":"16 15","pages":"8775-8807"},"PeriodicalIF":14.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theranostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7150/thno.132538","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) plays an important role in modern precision oncology. However, treatment activity is still prescribed by fixed-dose protocols rather than adjusted to planned patient-specific absorbed dose (AD). Individualized dosimetry holds promise for improving treatment planning but is not yet standard. One main reason is that present dosimetry workflows depend on repeated imaging at multiple time points and require kinetic modeling and computational modeling. This review covers recent approaches to make dosimetry more practical and easier to use in everyday RPT workflows. We introduce a theoretical framework in which simplification methods, which help ease the clinical burden of dosimetry, are classified into three related categories. The first two categories simplify the process through direct reduction in the burdens of either the acquisition or processing of data: (1) Methodological simplifications through reduction in the imaging burden, such as reduced- or single-time point (STP) imaging; and (2) Computational automation via artificial intelligence (AI) to automate dosimetry, including image processing, segmentation, registration, and AD estimation. Advanced modeling strategies in the third category improve efficiency through inference, thereby enabling estimation of AD from sparsely sampled data. Reduced imaging played a major role in defining these areas. While all of these have their promise, every category of methods has certain drawbacks. STP techniques are less reliable for heterogeneous tumors, black box models have poor transferability and explainability, and digital twin/physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (DT/PBPK) models lack clinical validation. Fundamental dosimetry, with appropriate validity conditions, could allow for reduced reliance on imaging skills and expertise while still retaining sufficient precision for its intended purposes. Standardization of imaging and multicenter analysis is essential for wider adoption of RPTs. A detailed description of models and their effectiveness would be helpful in the clinical application of dosimetry.

走向实用的放射性药物治疗计划:剂量学简化技术综述。
放射药物治疗在现代精密肿瘤学中占有重要地位。然而,治疗活性仍然由固定剂量方案规定,而不是根据计划的患者特异性吸收剂量(AD)进行调整。个体化剂量测定法有望改善治疗计划,但尚未成为标准。一个主要原因是目前的剂量学工作流程依赖于多个时间点的重复成像,需要动力学建模和计算建模。本综述涵盖了使剂量学在日常RPT工作流程中更实用和更容易使用的最新方法。我们介绍了一个理论框架,其中简化方法,这有助于减轻临床负担的剂量测定,分为三个相关的类别。前两类通过直接减少数据采集或处理的负担来简化过程:(1)通过减少成像负担来简化方法,例如减少或单时间点(STP)成像;(2)通过人工智能(AI)实现自动化剂量测定的计算自动化,包括图像处理、分割、配准和AD估计。第三类中的高级建模策略通过推理提高了效率,从而能够从稀疏采样数据中估计AD。减少成像在确定这些区域方面起着重要作用。虽然所有这些方法都有各自的优点,但每种方法都有一定的缺点。STP技术对异质性肿瘤的可靠性较低,黑箱模型的可转移性和可解释性较差,数字双胞胎/基于生理的药代动力学(DT/PBPK)模型缺乏临床验证。在适当的效度条件下,基础剂量学可以减少对成像技术和专门知识的依赖,同时仍然保持其预期目的的足够精度。成像标准化和多中心分析对于RPTs的广泛采用至关重要。对模型及其有效性的详细描述将有助于剂量学的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Theranostics
Theranostics MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
25.40
自引率
1.60%
发文量
433
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Theranostics serves as a pivotal platform for the exchange of clinical and scientific insights within the diagnostic and therapeutic molecular and nanomedicine community, along with allied professions engaged in integrating molecular imaging and therapy. As a multidisciplinary journal, Theranostics showcases innovative research articles spanning fields such as in vitro diagnostics and prognostics, in vivo molecular imaging, molecular therapeutics, image-guided therapy, biosensor technology, nanobiosensors, bioelectronics, system biology, translational medicine, point-of-care applications, and personalized medicine. Encouraging a broad spectrum of biomedical research with potential theranostic applications, the journal rigorously peer-reviews primary research, alongside publishing reviews, news, and commentary that aim to bridge the gap between the laboratory, clinic, and biotechnology industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书