ChatGPT 4.o Responses to Commonly Asked Colon and Rectal Cancer Questions From a Patient Perspective.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Alyssa Habermann, Tania Gupta, Stephen Cohen, Syed Shah, Adam Khader, Kathryn Fong, Michael F Amendola
{"title":"ChatGPT 4.o Responses to Commonly Asked Colon and Rectal Cancer Questions From a Patient Perspective.","authors":"Alyssa Habermann, Tania Gupta, Stephen Cohen, Syed Shah, Adam Khader, Kathryn Fong, Michael F Amendola","doi":"10.1177/15533506261485700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPatients are increasingly turning to large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT for medical guidance, prompting concerns around medical competence. This study assesses the proficiency of ChatGPT 4.o in answering patient questions regarding the surgical management of colon and rectal cancer.MethodsChatGPT 4.o was prompted with 10 patient-based questions regarding the surgical management of colon and rectal cancer. A five-surgeon panel evaluated each response for completeness, accuracy, and effective communication (5-point Likert scale). ANOVA was used to compare difference between response categories and unpaired t-test was used to compare scores between colon and rectal cancers.ResultsThe average scores of all colon and rectal questions were 13.02 ± 0.57 and 12.94 ± 0.55, respectively (out of 15). The highest scoring colon question related to postoperative length of stay (13.80 ± 1.30) and the lowest scoring colon question pertained to operative time (12.20 ± 1.92). The highest scoring rectal questions discussed bowel continence and return to normal activities (13.60 ± 1.34 and 13.60 ± 1.52) and the lowest scoring rectal question explained surgical procedures for removing rectal cancer (11.80 ± 2.28). Average scores (out of 5) for completeness, accuracy, and communication were 4.56 ± 0.69, 4.35 ± 0.73, and 4.16 ± 0.71, respectively (<i>P</i> < .001). There was no significant difference between evaluator scores for colon and rectal questions (<i>P</i> > .05).ConclusionsChatGPT 4.o is capable of answering commonly asked patient questions regarding colon and rectal cancer with reasonable completeness, accuracy, and effective communication with statistically significant variations between these categories.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"15533506261485700"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506261485700","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPatients are increasingly turning to large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT for medical guidance, prompting concerns around medical competence. This study assesses the proficiency of ChatGPT 4.o in answering patient questions regarding the surgical management of colon and rectal cancer.MethodsChatGPT 4.o was prompted with 10 patient-based questions regarding the surgical management of colon and rectal cancer. A five-surgeon panel evaluated each response for completeness, accuracy, and effective communication (5-point Likert scale). ANOVA was used to compare difference between response categories and unpaired t-test was used to compare scores between colon and rectal cancers.ResultsThe average scores of all colon and rectal questions were 13.02 ± 0.57 and 12.94 ± 0.55, respectively (out of 15). The highest scoring colon question related to postoperative length of stay (13.80 ± 1.30) and the lowest scoring colon question pertained to operative time (12.20 ± 1.92). The highest scoring rectal questions discussed bowel continence and return to normal activities (13.60 ± 1.34 and 13.60 ± 1.52) and the lowest scoring rectal question explained surgical procedures for removing rectal cancer (11.80 ± 2.28). Average scores (out of 5) for completeness, accuracy, and communication were 4.56 ± 0.69, 4.35 ± 0.73, and 4.16 ± 0.71, respectively (P < .001). There was no significant difference between evaluator scores for colon and rectal questions (P > .05).ConclusionsChatGPT 4.o is capable of answering commonly asked patient questions regarding colon and rectal cancer with reasonable completeness, accuracy, and effective communication with statistically significant variations between these categories.

ChatGPT 4。从病人的角度回答结肠癌和直肠癌的常见问题。
患者越来越多地转向像ChatGPT这样的大型语言模型(llm)来寻求医疗指导,这引发了人们对医疗能力的担忧。本研究评估ChatGPT 4的熟练程度。在回答患者关于结肠癌和直肠癌手术治疗的问题时。MethodsChatGPT 4。O被要求回答10个以患者为基础的关于结肠癌和直肠癌手术治疗的问题。由5位外科医生组成的小组对每个答复的完整性、准确性和有效沟通进行评估(李克特5分量表)。用方差分析比较不同反应类别的差异,用未配对t检验比较结肠癌和直肠癌的得分。结果所有结肠和直肠问题的平均得分分别为13.02±0.57分和12.94±0.55分(满分15分)。结肠问题得分最高的是术后住院时间(13.80±1.30),结肠问题得分最低的是手术时间(12.20±1.92)。得分最高的直肠问题讨论了肠失禁和恢复正常活动(13.60±1.34和13.60±1.52),得分最低的直肠问题解释了切除直肠癌的手术方法(11.80±2.28)。完整性、准确性和沟通的平均得分(满分为5分)分别为4.56±0.69、4.35±0.73和4.16±0.71 (P < 0.001)。评估者在结肠和直肠问题上的得分无显著差异(P < 0.05)。ConclusionsChatGPT 4。O能够以合理的完整性、准确性和有效的沟通回答患者关于结肠癌和直肠癌的常见问题,这些类别之间的差异具有统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书