Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for Treatment of Complete Benign Biliary Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Aamir Saeed, Saira Yousuf, Hina Akbar, Sultan Mahmood, Leonard Baidoo, Janak Shah, Mark Radlinski, Claudio R Tombazzi, Mansour A Parsi, Mustafa Arain, Faisal Kamal
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Magnetic Compression Anastomosis for Treatment of Complete Benign Biliary Strictures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Aamir Saeed, Saira Yousuf, Hina Akbar, Sultan Mahmood, Leonard Baidoo, Janak Shah, Mark Radlinski, Claudio R Tombazzi, Mansour A Parsi, Mustafa Arain, Faisal Kamal","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures (BBS) are difficult to treat. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) has recently been used in such cases with reportedly low complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MCA in the management of complete benign biliary obstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multiple databases were searched to identify studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of MCA in complete BBS from inception to December 26, 2025. Outcomes of interest included technical success (recanalization), stricture recurrence, procedure-related adverse events, and cholangitis. Pooled estimates with 95% CIs were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six studies comprising 182 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled technical success rate of MCA was 92.6% (95% CI: 87.5%-95.7%). The pooled stricture recurrence rate was 18.5% (95% CI: 10.7%-30.2%). The pooled rate of procedure-related adverse events was 7.6% (95% CI: 1.9%-25.9%), and the pooled rate of postprocedure cholangitis was 3.8% (95% CI: 1.5%-9.2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis demonstrates that MCA is a safe and effective treatment for complete benign biliary strictures. MCA appears to be a highly effective and minimally invasive therapeutic option for refractory biliary strictures, achieving high technical success rates even in patients who have failed conventional interventions. However, the current evidence base is limited by small, nonrandomized studies. Larger, preferably randomized, studies are needed to define optimal clinical indications, standardize treatment protocols, and clarify MCA's role as a potential standard-of-care therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001502","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Completely obstructed benign biliary strictures (BBS) are difficult to treat. Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) has recently been used in such cases with reportedly low complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MCA in the management of complete benign biliary obstruction.

Methods: Multiple databases were searched to identify studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of MCA in complete BBS from inception to December 26, 2025. Outcomes of interest included technical success (recanalization), stricture recurrence, procedure-related adverse events, and cholangitis. Pooled estimates with 95% CIs were calculated using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistic.

Results: Six studies comprising 182 patients met the inclusion criteria. The pooled technical success rate of MCA was 92.6% (95% CI: 87.5%-95.7%). The pooled stricture recurrence rate was 18.5% (95% CI: 10.7%-30.2%). The pooled rate of procedure-related adverse events was 7.6% (95% CI: 1.9%-25.9%), and the pooled rate of postprocedure cholangitis was 3.8% (95% CI: 1.5%-9.2%).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis demonstrates that MCA is a safe and effective treatment for complete benign biliary strictures. MCA appears to be a highly effective and minimally invasive therapeutic option for refractory biliary strictures, achieving high technical success rates even in patients who have failed conventional interventions. However, the current evidence base is limited by small, nonrandomized studies. Larger, preferably randomized, studies are needed to define optimal clinical indications, standardize treatment protocols, and clarify MCA's role as a potential standard-of-care therapy.

磁压吻合治疗完全性良性胆道狭窄的安全性和有效性:系统回顾和meta分析。
背景和目的:完全梗阻的良性胆道狭窄(BBS)很难治疗。磁压缩吻合术(MCA)最近被用于这类病例,据报道并发症发生率低。本研究旨在评价MCA治疗完全性良性胆道梗阻的安全性和有效性。方法:检索多个数据库,以确定从成立到2025年12月26日评估MCA在完全BBS中的安全性和有效性的研究。研究结果包括技术成功(再通)、狭窄复发、手术相关不良事件和胆管炎。95% ci的汇总估计使用Mantel-Haenszel随机效应模型计算。采用I2统计量评估异质性。结果:6项研究包括182例患者符合纳入标准。MCA合并技术成功率为92.6% (95% CI: 87.5% ~ 95.7%)。合并狭窄复发率为18.5% (95% CI: 10.7% ~ 30.2%)。手术相关不良事件的总发生率为7.6% (95% CI: 1.9%-25.9%),术后胆管炎的总发生率为3.8% (95% CI: 1.5%-9.2%)。结论:本荟萃分析表明MCA是一种安全有效的治疗完全良性胆道狭窄的方法。MCA似乎是一种非常有效的微创治疗顽固性胆道狭窄的选择,即使在传统干预失败的患者中也能取得很高的技术成功率。然而,目前的证据基础受到小型、非随机研究的限制。需要更大的、最好是随机的研究来确定最佳的临床适应症,标准化的治疗方案,并明确MCA作为潜在的标准治疗的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书