Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Patients with Traditional Contraindications: A Systematic Review of 2232 Cases.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-07 DOI:10.1177/08850666261483584
Amani Daoud, Shiri Geva, Yonatan Finkelstein, Dana Grosbard, Ohad Ronen
{"title":"Safety and Feasibility of Percutaneous Tracheostomy in Patients with Traditional Contraindications: A Systematic Review of 2232 Cases.","authors":"Amani Daoud, Shiri Geva, Yonatan Finkelstein, Dana Grosbard, Ohad Ronen","doi":"10.1177/08850666261483584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposePercutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a widely performed procedure. However, it is sometimes contraindicated based on manufacturer guidelines and existing literature. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of performing PDT in patients with documented contraindications.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed and TDNet, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Studies describing PDT performed in the presence of absolute or relative contraindications were included<b><i>.</i></b> The literature search included studies published between 1991 and 2024. Data on patient demographics, contraindications, complications, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis incorporated findings from both the included studies and our case series.ResultsA total of 76 studies, along with our case series, included 2232 patients with a mean age of 48.5 years. The most common contraindications were bleeding diathesis (n = 947, 42.4%), and morbid obesity (n = 360, 16.1%). Many patients presented with multiple contraindications. The primary indications for tracheostomy were anticipated prolonged intubation, airway obstruction, and trauma. Bronchoscopic guidance was used in 45.6% of cases, and ultrasound guidance in 24.6%. The most frequently reported complication was bleeding (5.96%), followed by stoma narrowing (0.67%) and infection (0.63%). The overall procedural failure rate was 0.36%, and procedural mortality was rare (0.13%).ConclusionThis review suggests that PDT may be safely performed in carefully selected patients with traditional contraindications when conducted by experienced teams with appropriate backup. These findings do not support the routine use of PDT in all patients with traditional contraindications, but rather highlight its feasibility in carefully selected cases managed by appropriately skilled teams. Future controlled studies are warranted to re-evaluate current contraindications guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":16307,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1178-1193"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intensive Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08850666261483584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposePercutaneous dilational tracheostomy (PDT) is a widely performed procedure. However, it is sometimes contraindicated based on manufacturer guidelines and existing literature. This study evaluates the safety and feasibility of performing PDT in patients with documented contraindications.MethodsA systematic review was conducted using PubMed and TDNet, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) reporting guidelines. Studies describing PDT performed in the presence of absolute or relative contraindications were included. The literature search included studies published between 1991 and 2024. Data on patient demographics, contraindications, complications, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Statistical analysis incorporated findings from both the included studies and our case series.ResultsA total of 76 studies, along with our case series, included 2232 patients with a mean age of 48.5 years. The most common contraindications were bleeding diathesis (n = 947, 42.4%), and morbid obesity (n = 360, 16.1%). Many patients presented with multiple contraindications. The primary indications for tracheostomy were anticipated prolonged intubation, airway obstruction, and trauma. Bronchoscopic guidance was used in 45.6% of cases, and ultrasound guidance in 24.6%. The most frequently reported complication was bleeding (5.96%), followed by stoma narrowing (0.67%) and infection (0.63%). The overall procedural failure rate was 0.36%, and procedural mortality was rare (0.13%).ConclusionThis review suggests that PDT may be safely performed in carefully selected patients with traditional contraindications when conducted by experienced teams with appropriate backup. These findings do not support the routine use of PDT in all patients with traditional contraindications, but rather highlight its feasibility in carefully selected cases managed by appropriately skilled teams. Future controlled studies are warranted to re-evaluate current contraindications guidelines.

2232例经皮气管切开术治疗传统禁忌症的安全性和可行性:系统回顾。
目的经皮扩张性气管切开术(PDT)是一种广泛应用的手术。然而,根据制造商指南和现有文献,它有时是禁忌的。本研究评估了在有禁忌症的患者中实施PDT的安全性和可行性。方法采用PubMed和TDNet进行系统评价,遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)报告指南的首选报告项目。研究描述了在存在绝对或相对禁忌症的情况下进行PDT。文献检索包括1991年至2024年间发表的研究。提取了患者人口统计学、禁忌症、并发症和临床结果的数据。统计分析结合了纳入研究和我们的病例系列的结果。结果76项研究和我们的病例系列共纳入2232例患者,平均年龄48.5岁。最常见的禁忌症是出血性素质(n = 947, 42.4%)和病态肥胖(n = 360, 16.1%)。许多患者出现多重禁忌症。气管切开术的主要适应症是预期插管时间延长,气道阻塞和创伤。支气管镜引导占45.6%,超声引导占24.6%。最常见的并发症是出血(5.96%),其次是造口狭窄(0.67%)和感染(0.63%)。手术失败率为0.36%,手术死亡率为0.13%。结论本综述提示,在经验丰富的团队和适当的支持下,PDT可以安全地在有传统禁忌症的患者中进行。这些发现并不支持在所有有传统禁忌症的患者中常规使用PDT,而是强调了在由适当熟练的团队管理的精心挑选的病例中使用PDT的可行性。未来的对照研究有必要重新评估当前的禁忌症指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
Journal of Intensive Care Medicine CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Journal of Intensive Care Medicine (JIC) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal offering medical and surgical clinicians in adult and pediatric intensive care state-of-the-art, broad-based analytic reviews and updates, original articles, reports of large clinical series, techniques and procedures, topic-specific electronic resources, book reviews, and editorials on all aspects of intensive/critical/coronary care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书