The surrogacy of disease-free survival for overall survival in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Feng Su, Xu Huang, Subinuer Maimaiti, Jun Yin, Lijie Tan, Yaxing Shen
{"title":"The surrogacy of disease-free survival for overall survival in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy.","authors":"Feng Su, Xu Huang, Subinuer Maimaiti, Jun Yin, Lijie Tan, Yaxing Shen","doi":"10.1007/s10147-026-03188-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Disease-free survival (DFS) is increasingly proposed as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in oncology trials, yet its validity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unconfirmed. This study evaluated the surrogacy of DFS for OS in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individual patient data from a prospectively maintained cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy (N = 578) were analyzed. Individual-level surrogacy was assessed by comparing long-term OS with expected survival in a demographically matched general population using standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and landmark analysis. Trial-level surrogacy was evaluated via weighted linear regression of treatment effects on DFS and OS across published clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients remaining recurrence-free at 3 years achieved a 5-year OS rate of 93.0%, comparable to the matched general population (SMR = 0.935; 95% CI: 0.491-1.380). Conversely, early recurrence was associated with substantially worse outcomes, with a 51.3% absolute risk difference in 5-year OS between groups in landmark analysis. At the trial level, short-term DFS demonstrated a strong correlation with OS (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.776).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Short-term DFS is robustly correlated with long-term OS and may serve as a potential surrogate endpoint in locally advanced ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy, supported by both individual- and trial-level evidence. Patients achieving 3-year recurrence-free status exhibit long-term survival indistinguishable from the general population, reinforcing the clinical utility of DFS as an early efficacy marker in neoadjuvant trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-026-03188-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Disease-free survival (DFS) is increasingly proposed as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival (OS) in oncology trials, yet its validity in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains unconfirmed. This study evaluated the surrogacy of DFS for OS in patients with locally advanced ESCC receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

Methods: Individual patient data from a prospectively maintained cohort of patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical esophagectomy (N = 578) were analyzed. Individual-level surrogacy was assessed by comparing long-term OS with expected survival in a demographically matched general population using standardized mortality ratios (SMR) and landmark analysis. Trial-level surrogacy was evaluated via weighted linear regression of treatment effects on DFS and OS across published clinical trials.

Results: Patients remaining recurrence-free at 3 years achieved a 5-year OS rate of 93.0%, comparable to the matched general population (SMR = 0.935; 95% CI: 0.491-1.380). Conversely, early recurrence was associated with substantially worse outcomes, with a 51.3% absolute risk difference in 5-year OS between groups in landmark analysis. At the trial level, short-term DFS demonstrated a strong correlation with OS (R2 = 0.776).

Conclusions: Short-term DFS is robustly correlated with long-term OS and may serve as a potential surrogate endpoint in locally advanced ESCC following neoadjuvant therapy, supported by both individual- and trial-level evidence. Patients achieving 3-year recurrence-free status exhibit long-term survival indistinguishable from the general population, reinforcing the clinical utility of DFS as an early efficacy marker in neoadjuvant trials.

局部晚期食管鳞状细胞癌新辅助治疗后无病生存期对总生存期的替代作用。
无病生存期(DFS)越来越多地被提出作为肿瘤试验中总生存期(OS)的替代终点,但其在食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)中的有效性仍未得到证实。本研究评估了在接受新辅助治疗的局部晚期ESCC患者中DFS替代OS的效果。方法:对接受新辅助治疗后根治性食管切除术的患者(N = 578)的个体数据进行前瞻性分析。通过使用标准化死亡率(SMR)和里程碑分析,比较人口统计学匹配的一般人群的长期生存期和预期生存期,对个体水平的代孕进行评估。通过对已发表的临床试验中治疗对DFS和OS的影响进行加权线性回归来评估试验水平的代孕。结果:3年无复发患者的5年OS率为93.0%,与匹配的普通人群相当(SMR = 0.935; 95% CI: 0.491-1.380)。相反,早期复发与显著较差的预后相关,在里程碑分析中,两组间5年OS的绝对风险差异为51.3%。在试验水平,短期DFS与OS有很强的相关性(R2 = 0.776)。结论:短期DFS与长期OS密切相关,可作为局部晚期ESCC新辅助治疗后的潜在替代终点,得到个体和试验水平证据的支持。达到3年无复发状态的患者表现出与一般人群没有区别的长期生存,这加强了DFS作为新辅助试验早期疗效指标的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书