Enhancing urine culture ordering practices through implementation of a urine culture order note at an academic Veterans Affairs medical center.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Tyler Luu, Ann Fisher, Louise-Marie Dembry, Andrew Chou, Anthony Pellegrino, Duc Nguyen
{"title":"Enhancing urine culture ordering practices through implementation of a urine culture order note at an academic Veterans Affairs medical center.","authors":"Tyler Luu, Ann Fisher, Louise-Marie Dembry, Andrew Chou, Anthony Pellegrino, Duc Nguyen","doi":"10.1017/ice.2026.10533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Urine cultures have been ordered inappropriately among many asymptomatic hospitalized patients. This study aimed to assess how a new urine culture order note incorporated into an electronic health record system impacted the number and appropriateness of urine cultures performed.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A quasi-experimental before-and-after intervention.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System (VACTHS) in West Haven, Connecticut.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>The study included hospitalized adult patients who had urine cultures performed from January 1<sup>st</sup>, 2023, to October 31<sup>st</sup>, 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention was the addition of a mandatory urine culture order note that linked to a urine culture order in the electronic health record. The note required providers to choose an indication for ordering a urine culture. The study outcomes were the percentage of appropriateness associated with urine cultures and the number of urine cultures per 100 admissions performed pre- and post-intervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the initiation of the mandatory urine culture order note, the percentage of appropriateness increased from 20.6% before the intervention to 59.6% after the intervention (<i>P</i> < .01). The average monthly number of urine cultures per 100 admissions performed decreased from 18.6 before the intervention to 10 after the intervention, a significant 46.3% reduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The implementation of a mandatory urine culture order note linked to the urine culture order resulted in increased urine culture order appropriateness and a significant decrease in number of orders for urine cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2026.10533","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Urine cultures have been ordered inappropriately among many asymptomatic hospitalized patients. This study aimed to assess how a new urine culture order note incorporated into an electronic health record system impacted the number and appropriateness of urine cultures performed.

Design: A quasi-experimental before-and-after intervention.

Setting: The study was conducted at the Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System (VACTHS) in West Haven, Connecticut.

Patients: The study included hospitalized adult patients who had urine cultures performed from January 1st, 2023, to October 31st, 2024.

Intervention: The intervention was the addition of a mandatory urine culture order note that linked to a urine culture order in the electronic health record. The note required providers to choose an indication for ordering a urine culture. The study outcomes were the percentage of appropriateness associated with urine cultures and the number of urine cultures per 100 admissions performed pre- and post-intervention.

Results: Following the initiation of the mandatory urine culture order note, the percentage of appropriateness increased from 20.6% before the intervention to 59.6% after the intervention (P < .01). The average monthly number of urine cultures per 100 admissions performed decreased from 18.6 before the intervention to 10 after the intervention, a significant 46.3% reduction.

Conclusion: The implementation of a mandatory urine culture order note linked to the urine culture order resulted in increased urine culture order appropriateness and a significant decrease in number of orders for urine cultures.

通过在学术退伍军人事务医疗中心实施尿液培养顺序说明,加强尿液培养顺序实践。
目的:在许多无症状住院患者中,尿培养是不恰当的。本研究旨在评估纳入电子健康记录系统的新尿培养顺序记录如何影响尿培养的数量和适当性。设计:准实验前后干预。背景:该研究是在康涅狄格州西黑文的退伍军人事务康涅狄格州医疗保健系统(VACTHS)进行的。患者:该研究包括在2023年1月1日至2024年10月31日期间进行尿液培养的住院成年患者。干预措施:干预措施是在电子健康记录中添加与尿培养命令相关联的强制性尿培养命令说明。该说明要求医疗服务提供者选择尿培养的适应症。研究结果是与尿培养相关的适当性百分比和每100名入院患者在干预前和干预后进行的尿培养次数。结果:启动强制尿培养单注后,适宜性比例由干预前的20.6%上升至干预后的59.6% (P < 0.01)。每100名入院患者每月平均尿液培养次数从干预前的18.6次减少到干预后的10次,显著减少46.3%。结论:与尿培养顺序相关的强制性尿培养顺序注释的实施增加了尿培养顺序的适当性,并显著减少了尿培养顺序的数量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书