Opportunities and risks of big data for the methods and culture of psychological science

IF 22 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gabrielle C. Ibasco, Friedrich M. Götz, Luke Clark, Jessica L. Tracy
{"title":"Opportunities and risks of big data for the methods and culture of psychological science","authors":"Gabrielle C. Ibasco, Friedrich M. Götz, Luke Clark, Jessica L. Tracy","doi":"10.1038/s44159-026-00603-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The use of big data, such as large-scale observational and/or archival data, can help psychology to overcome problems with generalizability and enable the study of real-world behaviours. At the same time, big data can be overused or misapplied, which risks reintroducing issues such as an over-reliance on correlations bereft of explanatory power. It is therefore essential that psychologists consider how to leverage big data in an informed and intentional manner. In this Perspective, we describe not only the methodological contributions and limitations of big data, but also the cultural opportunities and risks these approaches evoke; that is, how big data shapes the ways in which psychologists conceptualize and tackle research questions. Of particular concern is that an increased emphasis on big data in combination with academia’s publish-or-perish incentive structure could shift the field from ‘theories-guide-data’ to ‘data-guide-theories’. To address this concern and others, we discuss how big data might be harmonized with experimental approaches, which would enable scholars to harness the power of big data while avoiding its pitfalls. Big data can address problems with generalizability and enable the study of real-world behaviours. However, the overuse of big data could lead to over-reliance on correlations bereft of explanatory power. In this Perspective, Ibasco et al. describe the methodological and cultural opportunities and risks of big data for psychological science.","PeriodicalId":74249,"journal":{"name":"Nature reviews psychology","volume":"5 9","pages":"625-635"},"PeriodicalIF":22.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature reviews psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44159-026-00603-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of big data, such as large-scale observational and/or archival data, can help psychology to overcome problems with generalizability and enable the study of real-world behaviours. At the same time, big data can be overused or misapplied, which risks reintroducing issues such as an over-reliance on correlations bereft of explanatory power. It is therefore essential that psychologists consider how to leverage big data in an informed and intentional manner. In this Perspective, we describe not only the methodological contributions and limitations of big data, but also the cultural opportunities and risks these approaches evoke; that is, how big data shapes the ways in which psychologists conceptualize and tackle research questions. Of particular concern is that an increased emphasis on big data in combination with academia’s publish-or-perish incentive structure could shift the field from ‘theories-guide-data’ to ‘data-guide-theories’. To address this concern and others, we discuss how big data might be harmonized with experimental approaches, which would enable scholars to harness the power of big data while avoiding its pitfalls. Big data can address problems with generalizability and enable the study of real-world behaviours. However, the overuse of big data could lead to over-reliance on correlations bereft of explanatory power. In this Perspective, Ibasco et al. describe the methodological and cultural opportunities and risks of big data for psychological science.
大数据对心理科学方法和文化的机遇与风险
使用大数据,如大规模的观察和/或档案数据,可以帮助心理学克服泛化的问题,使研究现实世界的行为成为可能。与此同时,大数据可能被过度使用或误用,这可能会重新引发一些问题,比如过度依赖缺乏解释力的相关性。因此,心理学家必须考虑如何以知情和有意的方式利用大数据。在这个视角中,我们不仅描述了大数据在方法论上的贡献和局限性,还描述了这些方法所带来的文化机遇和风险;也就是说,大数据如何塑造心理学家概念化和解决研究问题的方式。特别值得关注的是,对大数据的日益重视与学术界“要么发表要么灭亡”的激励结构相结合,可能会使该领域从“理论指导数据”转向“数据指导理论”。为了解决这个问题和其他问题,我们讨论了如何将大数据与实验方法协调起来,这将使学者能够利用大数据的力量,同时避免其陷阱。大数据可以解决具有普遍性的问题,并能够研究现实世界的行为。然而,过度使用大数据可能导致过度依赖缺乏解释力的相关性。在这个视角中,Ibasco等人描述了大数据给心理科学带来的方法论和文化上的机遇和风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书