Restorative Journeys: Youth Offending Trajectories and Victim Recovery Following Restorative Justice Conferencing

Q2 Social Sciences
Howard Journal of Crime and Justice Pub Date : 2026-09-08 Epub Date: 2026-04-29 DOI:10.1111/hojo.70038
Masahiro Suzuki
{"title":"Restorative Journeys: Youth Offending Trajectories and Victim Recovery Following Restorative Justice Conferencing","authors":"Masahiro Suzuki","doi":"10.1111/hojo.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Restorative justice (RJ) is associated with offenders’ movement away from crime and victim recovery. However, little is known about the circumstances under which RJ can simultaneously achieve the dual objectives. Using secondary data from the South Australian Juvenile Justice study, this research examines how RJ conferencing shapes short-term youth offending trajectories and victim recovery through relational analysis. Drawing on 60 case observations as well as 60 paired interviews and 60 paired follow-up interviews, totalling 240 interviews, the study demonstrates that outcomes are shaped less by offence characteristics than by relational alignment, emotional readiness, and meaning-making during RJ conferencing. While some encounters support both short-term non-offending and victim recovery, others produce asymmetrical benefits or fail to generate meaningful change. The study highlights the value of paired relational analysis and cautions against treating RJ as a uniform or universally effective intervention in youth justice.</p>","PeriodicalId":37514,"journal":{"name":"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice","volume":"65 3","pages":"321-333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hojo.70038","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Howard Journal of Crime and Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hojo.70038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Restorative justice (RJ) is associated with offenders’ movement away from crime and victim recovery. However, little is known about the circumstances under which RJ can simultaneously achieve the dual objectives. Using secondary data from the South Australian Juvenile Justice study, this research examines how RJ conferencing shapes short-term youth offending trajectories and victim recovery through relational analysis. Drawing on 60 case observations as well as 60 paired interviews and 60 paired follow-up interviews, totalling 240 interviews, the study demonstrates that outcomes are shaped less by offence characteristics than by relational alignment, emotional readiness, and meaning-making during RJ conferencing. While some encounters support both short-term non-offending and victim recovery, others produce asymmetrical benefits or fail to generate meaningful change. The study highlights the value of paired relational analysis and cautions against treating RJ as a uniform or universally effective intervention in youth justice.

恢复性旅程:青少年犯罪轨迹和恢复性司法会议后的受害者康复
恢复性司法(RJ)与罪犯远离犯罪和受害者康复有关。然而,对于RJ在何种情况下能够同时实现这两个目标,我们知之甚少。利用南澳大利亚州青少年司法研究的二手数据,本研究通过关系分析考察了RJ会议如何塑造短期青少年犯罪轨迹和受害者康复。根据60个案例观察,以及60个配对访谈和60个配对随访访谈,总共240个访谈,研究表明,在RJ会议期间,影响结果的主要因素不是犯罪特征,而是关系一致性、情绪准备和意义制造。虽然一些接触既支持短期的无犯罪行为,也支持受害者的康复,但其他接触产生的好处不对称,或者无法产生有意义的改变。该研究强调了配对关系分析的价值,并警告不要将RJ视为青少年司法中统一或普遍有效的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice is an international peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high quality theory, research and debate on all aspects of the relationship between crime and justice across the globe. It is a leading forum for conversation between academic theory and research and the cultures, policies and practices of the range of institutions concerned with harm, security and justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书