Developing supporter-focused text messages to enhance cessation support for individuals with mental health conditions who smoke: A formative study.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2026-07-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-06 DOI:10.1177/14604582261488344
Catherine S Nagawa, Sydney Newell Chesebro, Katie Qualls Fay, Madeline Hardage, Junru Zhao, Frances Wen, Michelle R vanDellen
{"title":"Developing supporter-focused text messages to enhance cessation support for individuals with mental health conditions who smoke: A formative study.","authors":"Catherine S Nagawa, Sydney Newell Chesebro, Katie Qualls Fay, Madeline Hardage, Junru Zhao, Frances Wen, Michelle R vanDellen","doi":"10.1177/14604582261488344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThis formative study aimed to develop and evaluate supporter-focused text messages intended to enhance helpful support behaviors and reduce counterproductive support behaviors in the context of smoking cessation.MethodsWe developed 65 messages informed by responsiveness theory and established research on cessation. One hundred and ninety six adults (eligibility: ≥18 years, knowing someone who smokes) rated the messages on three dimensions of helpfulness (i.e., clarity, usefulness, relevance). Using mixed-effects regression models, we examined whether helpfulness ratings differed by sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and tobacco use perceptions.ResultsMean ratings ranged from 4.04 to 4.31/5. Compared with participants who reported knowing a spouse/partner who smoked, those who knew a friend (β̂= 0.34, SE = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.64), family member (β̂= 0.38, SE = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.67), or coworker/roommate (β̂= 0.56, SE = 0.22, 95% CI:0.14 - 0.98) provided relatively higher ratings. Greater perceived relationship closeness to the individual who smokes was positively associated with higher ratings (β̂= 0.08, SE = 0.03, 95% CI:0.03- 0.14).ConclusionThe high ratings suggest that potential support providers found the messages helpful and tailoring them to relationship characteristics might provide a small additional benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"32 3","pages":"14604582261488344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582261488344","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThis formative study aimed to develop and evaluate supporter-focused text messages intended to enhance helpful support behaviors and reduce counterproductive support behaviors in the context of smoking cessation.MethodsWe developed 65 messages informed by responsiveness theory and established research on cessation. One hundred and ninety six adults (eligibility: ≥18 years, knowing someone who smokes) rated the messages on three dimensions of helpfulness (i.e., clarity, usefulness, relevance). Using mixed-effects regression models, we examined whether helpfulness ratings differed by sociodemographic factors, relationship factors, and tobacco use perceptions.ResultsMean ratings ranged from 4.04 to 4.31/5. Compared with participants who reported knowing a spouse/partner who smoked, those who knew a friend (β̂= 0.34, SE = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.64), family member (β̂= 0.38, SE = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.67), or coworker/roommate (β̂= 0.56, SE = 0.22, 95% CI:0.14 - 0.98) provided relatively higher ratings. Greater perceived relationship closeness to the individual who smokes was positively associated with higher ratings (β̂= 0.08, SE = 0.03, 95% CI:0.03- 0.14).ConclusionThe high ratings suggest that potential support providers found the messages helpful and tailoring them to relationship characteristics might provide a small additional benefit.

开发以支持者为中心的短信,以加强对有精神健康状况的吸烟者的戒烟支持:一项形成性研究。
本形成性研究旨在开发和评估以支持者为中心的短信,旨在增强戒烟背景下的有益支持行为,减少适得其反的支持行为。方法以响应性理论为指导,开发65条信息,建立戒烟研究。196名成年人(资格:≥18岁,认识吸烟的人)从有用性的三个维度(即清晰、有用、相关性)对这些信息进行了评分。使用混合效应回归模型,我们检验了助人评分是否因社会人口因素、关系因素和烟草使用认知而不同。结果平均评分范围为4.04 ~ 4.31/5。与报告知道配偶/伴侣吸烟的参与者相比,那些知道朋友(β′= 0.34,SE = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.04 - 0.64)、家庭成员(β′= 0.38,SE = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.67)或同事/室友(β′= 0.56,SE = 0.22, 95% CI:0.14 - 0.98)的参与者提供了相对较高的评分。感知到的与吸烟个体的亲密关系与较高的评分呈正相关(β′= 0.08,SE = 0.03, 95% CI:0.03- 0.14)。结论高评分表明潜在的支持提供者发现这些信息很有帮助,根据关系特征定制这些信息可能会带来一点额外的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书