Implementation of a Pharmacy-Led Psychotropic Stewardship Pilot Program at an Academic Medical Center

IF 1.5 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Olivia King, Jessica Cather, Paula Politis, Todd Ivan
{"title":"Implementation of a Pharmacy-Led Psychotropic Stewardship Pilot Program at an Academic Medical Center","authors":"Olivia King,&nbsp;Jessica Cather,&nbsp;Paula Politis,&nbsp;Todd Ivan","doi":"10.1002/jac5.70290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs) have been proposed to optimize psychiatric medication use and improve medication safety; however, data describing their implementation and impact in general medical inpatient settings remain limited. This quality improvement project evaluated a pharmacist-led PSP pilot at an academic medical center.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Adult inpatients were identified using predefined criteria including use of high-risk psychotropic agents (carbamazepine, clozapine, lithium, lamotrigine, valproic acid [VPA]), scheduled benzodiazepines in patients 65 years and older, and psychotropic polypharmacy (≥ 3 antidepressants or ≥ 2 antipsychotics). Pharmacists and prescribers could also identify patients for review. Exclusion criteria included admission to inpatient behavioral health units, active psychiatry consultation, admission to the acute palliative care/hospice unit, and emergency department status. Over 1 month, a pharmacist conducted chart reviews and collaborated with a psychiatrist to provide recommendations to primary teams. Interventions and outcomes were tracked and summarized using descriptive statistics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the pilot period, 626 patients were flagged for review; 473 met inclusion criteria and 190 underwent full evaluation. A total of 176 psychotropic stewardship interventions were recommended, of which 162 were accepted (92%). Patients were most identified by direct prescriber- or pharmacist-initiated review (51.1%) and high-risk psychotropic use (30.1%). Medication reconciliation (29.0%) accounted for the largest proportion of interventions made, followed by dose optimization (26.1%) and medication discontinuation (13.6%). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were the most frequently involved medication classes (23.9%).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>A pharmacist-led PSP was feasible in a general medical inpatient setting and resulted in a high rate of accepted interventions. These findings support the role of pharmacists in improving psychotropic medication safety and highlight opportunities for targeted, system-level interventions. Future work should evaluate clinical outcomes and long-term sustainability of PSPs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":73966,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","volume":"9 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy : JACCP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jac5.70290","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychotropic stewardship programs (PSPs) have been proposed to optimize psychiatric medication use and improve medication safety; however, data describing their implementation and impact in general medical inpatient settings remain limited. This quality improvement project evaluated a pharmacist-led PSP pilot at an academic medical center.

Methods

Adult inpatients were identified using predefined criteria including use of high-risk psychotropic agents (carbamazepine, clozapine, lithium, lamotrigine, valproic acid [VPA]), scheduled benzodiazepines in patients 65 years and older, and psychotropic polypharmacy (≥ 3 antidepressants or ≥ 2 antipsychotics). Pharmacists and prescribers could also identify patients for review. Exclusion criteria included admission to inpatient behavioral health units, active psychiatry consultation, admission to the acute palliative care/hospice unit, and emergency department status. Over 1 month, a pharmacist conducted chart reviews and collaborated with a psychiatrist to provide recommendations to primary teams. Interventions and outcomes were tracked and summarized using descriptive statistics.

Results

During the pilot period, 626 patients were flagged for review; 473 met inclusion criteria and 190 underwent full evaluation. A total of 176 psychotropic stewardship interventions were recommended, of which 162 were accepted (92%). Patients were most identified by direct prescriber- or pharmacist-initiated review (51.1%) and high-risk psychotropic use (30.1%). Medication reconciliation (29.0%) accounted for the largest proportion of interventions made, followed by dose optimization (26.1%) and medication discontinuation (13.6%). Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) were the most frequently involved medication classes (23.9%).

Conclusion

A pharmacist-led PSP was feasible in a general medical inpatient setting and resulted in a high rate of accepted interventions. These findings support the role of pharmacists in improving psychotropic medication safety and highlight opportunities for targeted, system-level interventions. Future work should evaluate clinical outcomes and long-term sustainability of PSPs.

在某学术医疗中心实施以药房为主导的精神药物管理试点项目。
背景:精神药物管理计划(psp)已被提出,以优化精神药物的使用和提高用药安全性;然而,描述它们在普通医疗住院环境中的实施和影响的数据仍然有限。这个质量改进项目评估了在一个学术医疗中心由药剂师领导的PSP试点项目。方法:采用预先确定的标准对成年住院患者进行鉴定,包括使用高危精神药物(卡马西平、氯氮平、锂、拉莫三嗪、丙戊酸[VPA]), 65岁及以上患者使用预定苯二氮卓类药物,以及使用多种精神药物(≥3种抗抑郁药物或≥2种抗精神病药物)。药剂师和开处方者也可以识别病人进行复查。排除标准包括住院行为健康单位、积极精神病学咨询、急性姑息治疗/临终关怀单位和急诊科状况。在一个多月的时间里,一名药剂师进行了病历审查,并与一名精神科医生合作,向初级团队提供建议。使用描述性统计跟踪和总结干预措施和结果。结果:在试点期间,626名患者被标记为审查;473例符合纳入标准,190例进行了全面评估。共推荐了176种精神药物管理干预措施,其中162种被接受(92%)。患者主要是通过处方医师或药剂师发起的审查(51.1%)和高危精神药物使用(30.1%)来确定的。采取的干预措施中,药物调节(29.0%)所占比例最大,其次是剂量优化(26.1%)和停药(13.6%)。选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)和5 -羟色胺/去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)是最常见的药物类别(23.9%)。结论:药师主导的PSP在普通医疗住院环境中是可行的,并且具有较高的接受率。这些发现支持了药剂师在提高精神药物安全性方面的作用,并强调了有针对性的系统级干预措施的机会。未来的工作应评估PSPs的临床结果和长期可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书