Pedal Arch Integrity is Independently Associated With Limb Salvage in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Isolated Peroneal Artery Runoff.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Laura Costa Pérez, Bahaa Arefai Refai, Jesús Carnicer Cáceres, Cristina Ibarz Giné, Raúl Vidal García
{"title":"Pedal Arch Integrity is Independently Associated With Limb Salvage in Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia With Isolated Peroneal Artery Runoff.","authors":"Laura Costa Pérez, Bahaa Arefai Refai, Jesús Carnicer Cáceres, Cristina Ibarz Giné, Raúl Vidal García","doi":"10.1177/15266028261479298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although current revascularization paradigms emphasize direct inline flow through the target arterial pathway (TAP), the prognostic importance of distal pedal connectivity in this anatomical setting remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Clinical, anatomical, procedural, and follow-up characteristics were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event analyses, and multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of major amputation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During follow-up, major amputation occurred in 29 limbs (25.7%). After multivariable adjustment, increasing Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage was independently associated with a higher risk of major amputation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11-9.45; <i>P</i> < .001), whereas each additional patent deep pedal arch was independently associated with a lower risk of limb loss (adjusted OR 0.23, 95% CI, 0.10-0.53; <i>P</i> < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated significantly better limb salvage in limbs with preserved pedal arch integrity (log-rank <i>P</i> = .003). At 12 months, estimated amputation-free survival was 68.1%, whereas freedom from major adverse limb event among revascularized limbs was 79.7%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with isolated peroneal artery runoff, distal pedal connectivity, reflected by pedal arch integrity, and clinical severity are the principal independent predictors of limb salvage. The peroneal-based global limb anatomic staging system classification improves anatomical stratification in this selected anatomical population but does not provide independent prognostic information beyond WIfI stage and distal pedal connectivity. These findings support the systematic assessment of distal pedal circulation when planning revascularization in this challenging anatomical subgroup.Clinical ImpactIn patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and isolated peroneal artery runoff, revascularization planning should extend beyond proximal anatomical complexity and include systematic assessment of distal pedal circulation. This study demonstrates that pedal arch integrity provides clinically relevant prognostic information for limb salvage, while WIfI stage remains a major determinant of amputation risk. Although application of the original GLASS framework using the peroneal artery as the target arterial pathway improves anatomical stratification, it does not independently predict limb loss. These findings support integrating clinical severity and distal pedal connectivity into treatment planning and prognostic assessment in this challenging anatomical subgroup.</p>","PeriodicalId":50210,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"15266028261479298"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Endovascular Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15266028261479298","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although current revascularization paradigms emphasize direct inline flow through the target arterial pathway (TAP), the prognostic importance of distal pedal connectivity in this anatomical setting remains uncertain.

Methods: Clinical, anatomical, procedural, and follow-up characteristics were analyzed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used for time-to-event analyses, and multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors of major amputation.

Results: During follow-up, major amputation occurred in 29 limbs (25.7%). After multivariable adjustment, increasing Wound, Ischemia, and foot Infection (WIfI) stage was independently associated with a higher risk of major amputation (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 4.47, 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.11-9.45; P < .001), whereas each additional patent deep pedal arch was independently associated with a lower risk of limb loss (adjusted OR 0.23, 95% CI, 0.10-0.53; P < .001). Kaplan-Meier estimates demonstrated significantly better limb salvage in limbs with preserved pedal arch integrity (log-rank P = .003). At 12 months, estimated amputation-free survival was 68.1%, whereas freedom from major adverse limb event among revascularized limbs was 79.7%.

Conclusions: In patients with isolated peroneal artery runoff, distal pedal connectivity, reflected by pedal arch integrity, and clinical severity are the principal independent predictors of limb salvage. The peroneal-based global limb anatomic staging system classification improves anatomical stratification in this selected anatomical population but does not provide independent prognostic information beyond WIfI stage and distal pedal connectivity. These findings support the systematic assessment of distal pedal circulation when planning revascularization in this challenging anatomical subgroup.Clinical ImpactIn patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and isolated peroneal artery runoff, revascularization planning should extend beyond proximal anatomical complexity and include systematic assessment of distal pedal circulation. This study demonstrates that pedal arch integrity provides clinically relevant prognostic information for limb salvage, while WIfI stage remains a major determinant of amputation risk. Although application of the original GLASS framework using the peroneal artery as the target arterial pathway improves anatomical stratification, it does not independently predict limb loss. These findings support integrating clinical severity and distal pedal connectivity into treatment planning and prognostic assessment in this challenging anatomical subgroup.

慢性危及肢体缺血伴孤立腓动脉径流患者足弓完整性与肢体保留独立相关。
背景:虽然目前的血运重建模式强调通过目标动脉通路(TAP)的直接内联血流,但在这种解剖学背景下,远端踏板连通性的预后重要性仍然不确定。方法:分析临床、解剖、手术及随访特点。Kaplan-Meier方法用于时间-事件分析,多变量逻辑回归确定了主要截肢的独立预测因素。结果:随访期间,29例(25.7%)肢体发生严重截肢。多变量校正后,伤口、缺血和足部感染(WIfI)分期的增加与大截肢的高风险独立相关(校正优势比[OR] 4.47, 95%可信区间[CI], 2.11-9.45; P P P = 0.003)。在12个月时,估计无截肢生存率为68.1%,而在血运重建的肢体中,无主要肢体不良事件的生存率为79.7%。结论:在腓骨动脉游离流患者中,足弓完整性反映的远端足连通性和临床严重程度是肢体保留的主要独立预测因素。腓骨为基础的全球肢体解剖分期系统分类改善了这一选定解剖人群的解剖分层,但除了WIfI分期和远端踏板连接之外,不能提供独立的预后信息。这些发现支持系统评估远端足部循环时,计划在这个具有挑战性的解剖亚群血运重建。临床影响对于慢性肢体威胁缺血和孤立腓骨动脉径流的患者,血运重建计划应超越近端解剖复杂性,并包括远端足部循环的系统评估。本研究表明足弓完整性为残肢保留提供了临床相关的预后信息,而WIfI分期仍然是截肢风险的主要决定因素。虽然使用腓动脉作为目标动脉通路的原始GLASS框架可以改善解剖分层,但它并不能独立预测肢体丧失。这些发现支持将临床严重程度和远端足部连通性纳入治疗计划和预后评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
15.40%
发文量
203
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Endovascular Therapy (formerly the Journal of Endovascular Surgery) was established in 1994 as a forum for all physicians, scientists, and allied healthcare professionals who are engaged or interested in peripheral endovascular techniques and technology. An official publication of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists (ISEVS), the Journal of Endovascular Therapy publishes peer-reviewed articles of interest to clinicians and researchers in the field of peripheral endovascular interventions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书