Enteral Nutrition Intolerance and Delivery Adequacy in Pediatric Critical Care: Development of a Score Using a 2018 Multinational Cohort Study Dataset.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Enid E Martinez, Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Dennis W Simon, Michael J Morowitz, Nilesh M Mehta
{"title":"Enteral Nutrition Intolerance and Delivery Adequacy in Pediatric Critical Care: Development of a Score Using a 2018 Multinational Cohort Study Dataset.","authors":"Enid E Martinez, Alireza Akhondi-Asl, Dennis W Simon, Michael J Morowitz, Nilesh M Mehta","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000004021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine the explanatory factors of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance and EN delivery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a 2018 multinational cohort study dataset.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A total of 77 PICUs with eight or more beds from 17 countries.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Children from 1 month to 18 years old requiring mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of PICU admission, with a PICU length of stay of 3 or more days.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We reviewed demographic, clinical, and nutrition data (e.g., EN adequacy), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (i.e., abdominal distension, vomiting/emesis, high gastric residual volume (GRV), diarrhea, and subjective abdominal discomfort) during the first 10 days of PICU admission. Our primary outcome was time to reach 60% EN adequacy. Explanatory variables included clinical factors and GI symptoms. We performed an extended Cox multivariable regression analysis with frailty adjusted for confounders and developed an EN tolerance score. Of the 1844 patients in the dataset, 1838 patients received EN. Mean (sd) age was 4.36 years (5.21 y), and 55.4% were male. Abdominal distension, vomiting/emesis and high GRV were associated with a lower hazard (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] with 95% CI) of achieving 60% EN goal: abdominal distension-aHR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.03-0.45); p = 0.002; vomiting/emesis-aHR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.90); p = 0.021; high GRV-aHR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15-0.59); p < 0.0001). The EN tolerance score components included age, opioid, vasopressor, and paralytic exposure, abdominal distention, vomiting/emesis, high GRV, continuous days of EN, and GI bleeding; for every 10 points on the score, the hazard of not achieving 60% EN adequacy doubled.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this 2018 dataset, GI symptoms, individually or as a composite, are associated with EN tolerance and adequacy. These symptoms, in conjunction with clinical factors, were used to develop a risk score that serves as a measure of EN tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000004021","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine the explanatory factors of enteral nutrition (EN) intolerance and EN delivery.

Design: Secondary analysis of a 2018 multinational cohort study dataset.

Setting: A total of 77 PICUs with eight or more beds from 17 countries.

Patients: Children from 1 month to 18 years old requiring mechanical ventilation within 48 hours of PICU admission, with a PICU length of stay of 3 or more days.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We reviewed demographic, clinical, and nutrition data (e.g., EN adequacy), and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms (i.e., abdominal distension, vomiting/emesis, high gastric residual volume (GRV), diarrhea, and subjective abdominal discomfort) during the first 10 days of PICU admission. Our primary outcome was time to reach 60% EN adequacy. Explanatory variables included clinical factors and GI symptoms. We performed an extended Cox multivariable regression analysis with frailty adjusted for confounders and developed an EN tolerance score. Of the 1844 patients in the dataset, 1838 patients received EN. Mean (sd) age was 4.36 years (5.21 y), and 55.4% were male. Abdominal distension, vomiting/emesis and high GRV were associated with a lower hazard (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] with 95% CI) of achieving 60% EN goal: abdominal distension-aHR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.03-0.45); p = 0.002; vomiting/emesis-aHR, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.90); p = 0.021; high GRV-aHR, 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15-0.59); p < 0.0001). The EN tolerance score components included age, opioid, vasopressor, and paralytic exposure, abdominal distention, vomiting/emesis, high GRV, continuous days of EN, and GI bleeding; for every 10 points on the score, the hazard of not achieving 60% EN adequacy doubled.

Conclusions: In this 2018 dataset, GI symptoms, individually or as a composite, are associated with EN tolerance and adequacy. These symptoms, in conjunction with clinical factors, were used to develop a risk score that serves as a measure of EN tolerance.

儿科重症监护的肠内营养不耐受和分娩充分性:使用2018年多国队列研究数据集制定评分
目的:探讨肠内营养不耐受及肠内营养递送的相关因素。设计:对2018年多国队列研究数据集进行二次分析。设置:共有77个picu, 8个或更多床位,来自17个国家。患者:1个月至18岁儿童,PICU入院48小时内需机械通气,PICU住院时间3天及以上。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们回顾了PICU入院前10天的人口学、临床和营养数据(如EN充分性)和胃肠道(GI)症状(如腹胀、呕吐/呕吐、胃残余量高(GRV)、腹泻和主观腹部不适)。我们的主要结果是达到60% EN充足性的时间。解释变量包括临床因素和胃肠道症状。我们进行了扩展Cox多变量回归分析,调整了混杂因素的脆弱性,并制定了EN耐受性评分。在数据集中的1844名患者中,1838名患者接受了EN治疗。平均(sd)年龄为4.36岁(5.21岁),55.4%为男性。腹胀、呕吐/呕吐和高GRV与实现60% EN目标的较低风险(校正风险比[aHR], 95% CI)相关:腹胀-aHR, 0.11 (95% CI, 0.03-0.45);P = 0.002;呕吐/呕吐- ahr, 0.49 (95% CI, 0.27-0.90);P = 0.021;GRV-aHR高,0.30 (95% CI, 0.15-0.59);P < 0.0001)。EN耐受性评分成分包括年龄、阿片类药物、血管加压剂和麻痹暴露、腹胀、呕吐/呕吐、高GRV、EN连续天数和胃肠道出血;每增加10分,未达到60% EN充分性的风险就会增加一倍。结论:在2018年的数据集中,胃肠道症状(单独或综合)与EN耐受性和充分性相关。这些症状与临床因素一起用于制定风险评分,作为EN耐受性的衡量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书