Tracheostomy Placement and Clinical Outcomes for Children Unable to Liberate From Mechanical Ventilation in the PICU.

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Colin M Rogerson, Jeremy M Loberger, Samer Abu-Sultaneh
{"title":"Tracheostomy Placement and Clinical Outcomes for Children Unable to Liberate From Mechanical Ventilation in the PICU.","authors":"Colin M Rogerson, Jeremy M Loberger, Samer Abu-Sultaneh","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000004034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Ventilator liberation is a priority for physicians in the PICU. Need for reintubation is associated with worse clinical outcomes and may culminate in tracheostomy tube placement for long-term invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We hypothesized that increasing number of extubation attempts were associated with increased likelihood of new tracheostomy tube placement, increased noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) use, and increased time between extubation and reintubation for children receiving IMV in the PICU.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study. We measured the frequency of new tracheostomy tube placement, number of reintubations, and use of NRS before reintubation. We also derived a mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify factors significantly associated with new tracheostomy tube placement.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Virtual Pediatric Systems Database.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>All encounters younger than 19 years old, endotracheally intubated for greater than or equal to 24 hours, and required reintubation within 7 days of a planned extubation attempt in the PICU between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We identified 14,085 encounters that met inclusion criteria, and 1,255 (8.9%) received a new tracheostomy tube. Increasing number of extubation attempts were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving a new tracheostomy tube (odds ratio, 1.42 [1.32-1.52]; p < 0.01). Mortality increased linearly with each unsuccessful extubation attempt from 8.1% with one attempt to 20.9% with five or more attempts. NRS use before reintubation increased from 45.6% after the first extubation attempt to a peak of 59.2% after the second extubation attempt. The time between extubation to reintubation increased from 0.8 days after the first extubation attempt to 3.5 days after the fourth extubation attempt. Younger age and renal and cardiac diagnoses were associated with lower odds of new tracheostomy tube placement. Respiratory, neurologic, oncologic, and traumatic diagnoses, as well as a longer total duration of IMV were associated with increased odds of new tracheostomy tube placement. Among encounters with two or more extubation attempts, tracheostomy placement was associated with longer IMV duration, longer length of stay, and lower mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found that increasing numbers of extubation attempts was associated with new tracheostomy tube placement, increased NRS use before reintubation, and increased time between extubation and reintubation in children in the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000004034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Ventilator liberation is a priority for physicians in the PICU. Need for reintubation is associated with worse clinical outcomes and may culminate in tracheostomy tube placement for long-term invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). We hypothesized that increasing number of extubation attempts were associated with increased likelihood of new tracheostomy tube placement, increased noninvasive respiratory support (NRS) use, and increased time between extubation and reintubation for children receiving IMV in the PICU.

Design: Retrospective cohort study. We measured the frequency of new tracheostomy tube placement, number of reintubations, and use of NRS before reintubation. We also derived a mixed-effects logistic regression model to identify factors significantly associated with new tracheostomy tube placement.

Setting: Virtual Pediatric Systems Database.

Patients: All encounters younger than 19 years old, endotracheally intubated for greater than or equal to 24 hours, and required reintubation within 7 days of a planned extubation attempt in the PICU between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2022.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We identified 14,085 encounters that met inclusion criteria, and 1,255 (8.9%) received a new tracheostomy tube. Increasing number of extubation attempts were significantly associated with increased odds of receiving a new tracheostomy tube (odds ratio, 1.42 [1.32-1.52]; p < 0.01). Mortality increased linearly with each unsuccessful extubation attempt from 8.1% with one attempt to 20.9% with five or more attempts. NRS use before reintubation increased from 45.6% after the first extubation attempt to a peak of 59.2% after the second extubation attempt. The time between extubation to reintubation increased from 0.8 days after the first extubation attempt to 3.5 days after the fourth extubation attempt. Younger age and renal and cardiac diagnoses were associated with lower odds of new tracheostomy tube placement. Respiratory, neurologic, oncologic, and traumatic diagnoses, as well as a longer total duration of IMV were associated with increased odds of new tracheostomy tube placement. Among encounters with two or more extubation attempts, tracheostomy placement was associated with longer IMV duration, longer length of stay, and lower mortality.

Conclusions: We found that increasing numbers of extubation attempts was associated with new tracheostomy tube placement, increased NRS use before reintubation, and increased time between extubation and reintubation in children in the PICU.

PICU中不能脱离机械通气的儿童气管造口术的放置和临床结果。
目的:解放呼吸机是PICU医师的首要任务。需要重新插管与较差的临床结果相关,并可能最终导致气管造口管放置长期有创机械通气(IMV)。我们假设拔管次数的增加与新的气管造口管放置的可能性增加、无创呼吸支持(NRS)的使用增加以及在PICU接受IMV的儿童拔管和再插管之间的时间增加有关。设计:回顾性队列研究。我们测量了新气管造口置管的频率、再插管次数和再插管前NRS的使用。我们还推导了一个混合效应logistic回归模型,以确定与新气管造口管放置显著相关的因素。设置:虚拟儿科系统数据库。患者:2013年1月1日至2022年12月31日期间,所有患者年龄小于19岁,气管插管时间大于或等于24小时,并在PICU计划拔管后7天内需要重新插管。干预措施:没有。测量和主要结果:我们确定了14085例符合纳入标准的患者,其中1255例(8.9%)接受了新的气管造口管。拔管次数的增加与接受新气管造口管的几率增加显著相关(优势比为1.42 [1.32-1.52];p < 0.01)。每次拔管失败,死亡率呈线性上升,从一次拔管失败的8.1%上升到五次或更多次拔管失败的20.9%。再次拔管前使用NRS的比例从第一次拔管后的45.6%上升到第二次拔管后的59.2%。拔管至再次拔管的时间从第一次拔管后的0.8天增加到第四次拔管后的3.5天。年龄越小,肾脏和心脏诊断越低,新气管造口置管的几率越低。呼吸、神经、肿瘤和创伤诊断,以及较长的IMV总持续时间与新气管造口管置入的几率增加有关。在两次或两次以上拔管尝试中,气管切开放置与较长的IMV持续时间、较长的住院时间和较低的死亡率相关。结论:我们发现,PICU患儿拔管次数的增加与气管造口新置管、再插管前NRS使用的增加以及拔管和再插管之间的时间增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书