Hanne Marte Nymoen, Zhi Zhao, Henrik Horndalsveen, Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Tarje Halvorsen, Tesfaye Madebo, Marianne Aanerud, Jussi Koivunen, Kersti Oselin, Saulius Cicenas, Nina Helbekkmo, Jarkko Ahvonen, Maria Silvoniemi, Tine Norman Alver, Tonje Dalen, Åsa Kristina Öjlert, Saima Jamil Farooqi, Åslaug Helland, Vilde Drageset Haakensen
{"title":"Gut microbiota alterations in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy.","authors":"Hanne Marte Nymoen, Zhi Zhao, Henrik Horndalsveen, Maria Moksnes Bjaanæs, Bjørn Henning Grønberg, Tarje Halvorsen, Tesfaye Madebo, Marianne Aanerud, Jussi Koivunen, Kersti Oselin, Saulius Cicenas, Nina Helbekkmo, Jarkko Ahvonen, Maria Silvoniemi, Tine Norman Alver, Tonje Dalen, Åsa Kristina Öjlert, Saima Jamil Farooqi, Åslaug Helland, Vilde Drageset Haakensen","doi":"10.1002/1878-0261.70326","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Growing evidence suggests that gut microbial features may predict-and potentially modulate-responses to cancer therapy, particularly immunotherapy. However, the impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the gut microbiota remains less well-understood. This knowledge gap is especially relevant in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where CRT typically precedes immunotherapy. We therefore investigated whether CRT alters gut microbial composition and whether such changes are associated with survival outcomes. Fecal samples were collected at three time points: prior to CRT (baseline), at completion of CRT, and immediately before initiation of consolidation immunotherapy, from 62 patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Microbiota profiling was performed using a qPCR-based panel (PMP™) targeting 108 prevalent microbial taxa. Within-sample (alpha) and between-sample (beta) bacterial diversity were assessed across time points and clinical subgroups defined by antibiotic exposure and survival outcomes. Alpha diversity remained stable from baseline to completion of CRT (all P > 0.60). Patients who received broad-spectrum antibiotics during CRT had significantly lower alpha diversity compared with those who did not receive antibiotics (P = 0.017), reflecting a transient between-group difference. Beta diversity differed modestly but significantly at baseline between survival groups (progression-free survival ≥ 18 vs < 18 months; PERMANOVA R<sup>2</sup> = 0.028, P = 0.045). The gut microbiota appears largely stable during CRT for locally advanced NSCLC but is susceptible to disruption by antibiotic use. Baseline beta diversity differences between survival groups may signal a potential role for gut microbial composition as a future preliminary biomarker and warrant further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18764,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13548291/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1878-0261.70326","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Growing evidence suggests that gut microbial features may predict-and potentially modulate-responses to cancer therapy, particularly immunotherapy. However, the impact of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) on the gut microbiota remains less well-understood. This knowledge gap is especially relevant in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), where CRT typically precedes immunotherapy. We therefore investigated whether CRT alters gut microbial composition and whether such changes are associated with survival outcomes. Fecal samples were collected at three time points: prior to CRT (baseline), at completion of CRT, and immediately before initiation of consolidation immunotherapy, from 62 patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Microbiota profiling was performed using a qPCR-based panel (PMP™) targeting 108 prevalent microbial taxa. Within-sample (alpha) and between-sample (beta) bacterial diversity were assessed across time points and clinical subgroups defined by antibiotic exposure and survival outcomes. Alpha diversity remained stable from baseline to completion of CRT (all P > 0.60). Patients who received broad-spectrum antibiotics during CRT had significantly lower alpha diversity compared with those who did not receive antibiotics (P = 0.017), reflecting a transient between-group difference. Beta diversity differed modestly but significantly at baseline between survival groups (progression-free survival ≥ 18 vs < 18 months; PERMANOVA R2 = 0.028, P = 0.045). The gut microbiota appears largely stable during CRT for locally advanced NSCLC but is susceptible to disruption by antibiotic use. Baseline beta diversity differences between survival groups may signal a potential role for gut microbial composition as a future preliminary biomarker and warrant further investigation.
越来越多的证据表明,肠道微生物特征可能预测并可能调节对癌症治疗的反应,特别是免疫治疗。然而,同步放化疗(CRT)对肠道微生物群的影响仍然不太清楚。这种知识差距与局部晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)尤其相关,CRT通常先于免疫治疗。因此,我们研究了CRT是否会改变肠道微生物组成,以及这种改变是否与生存结果相关。在三个时间点收集了62例局部晚期NSCLC患者的粪便样本:CRT(基线)之前,CRT完成时和开始巩固免疫治疗之前。利用基于qpcr的面板(PMP™)对108个流行的微生物类群进行微生物群分析。样本内(α)和样本间(β)细菌多样性评估了不同时间点和临床亚组的抗生素暴露和生存结果。α多样性从基线到CRT完成保持稳定(所有P值均为0.60)。在CRT期间接受广谱抗生素治疗的患者与未接受抗生素治疗的患者相比,α多样性显著降低(P = 0.017),反映了一种短暂的组间差异。在基线时,生存组之间的β多样性差异不大但显著(无进展生存期≥18 vs 2 = 0.028, P = 0.045)。在局部晚期NSCLC的CRT期间,肠道微生物群似乎基本稳定,但容易受到抗生素使用的破坏。生存组之间的基线β多样性差异可能表明肠道微生物组成作为未来初步生物标志物的潜在作用,值得进一步研究。
Molecular OncologyBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Medicine
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
1.50%
发文量
203
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍:
Molecular Oncology highlights new discoveries, approaches, and technical developments, in basic, clinical and discovery-driven translational cancer research. It publishes research articles, reviews (by invitation only), and timely science policy articles.
The journal is now fully Open Access with all articles published over the past 10 years freely available.