Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annular suture versus PELD alone for single-level lumbar disc herniation: A prospective propensity score-matched cohort study.

IF 1.6 4区 医学
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-06 DOI:10.1177/10225536261488132
Chen Li, Xi Xie, Jiaxin Ma, Yang Yang, Shujun Ren, Xi Gao
{"title":"Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy combined with annular suture versus PELD alone for single-level lumbar disc herniation: A prospective propensity score-matched cohort study.","authors":"Chen Li, Xi Xie, Jiaxin Ma, Yang Yang, Shujun Ren, Xi Gao","doi":"10.1177/10225536261488132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSymptomatic same-level recurrence remains a concern after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). We compared PELD plus endoscopic annular suture with PELD alone.MethodsThis single-center prospective observational cohort enrolled patients from January 2023 through October 2024. Treatment was selected through shared clinician-patient decision-making. Propensity scores based on eight baseline variables were matched 1:1, yielding 51 patients per group. Clinical scores were assessed through 12 months; symptomatic recurrence was followed for up to 23.9 months. Kaplan-Meier and exploratory Cox analyses were used.ResultsBoth groups improved. At 6 and 12 months, the suture group had better Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Oswestry Disability Index scores, whereas 12-month pain scores were similar. Symptomatic recurrence occurred in 13/51 controls (25.49%) and 4/51 suture patients (7.84%; P = 0.017). Eighteen-month recurrence-free estimates were 75.2% (95% CI 59.2%-85.6%) and 94.9% (95% CI 80.3%-98.7%), respectively (log-rank P = 0.028). Reoperation (10/51 vs 4/51; P = 0.084) and complications (4/51 vs 3/51) did not differ significantly. Subgroup estimates were limited by only 17 events.ConclusionsAnnular suture was associated with better short-to midterm function and fewer symptomatic recurrences, but causality and long-term effectiveness remain uncertain. Larger multicenter studies with longer, imaging-based follow-up are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":16608,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":"34 3","pages":"10225536261488132"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10225536261488132","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSymptomatic same-level recurrence remains a concern after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD). We compared PELD plus endoscopic annular suture with PELD alone.MethodsThis single-center prospective observational cohort enrolled patients from January 2023 through October 2024. Treatment was selected through shared clinician-patient decision-making. Propensity scores based on eight baseline variables were matched 1:1, yielding 51 patients per group. Clinical scores were assessed through 12 months; symptomatic recurrence was followed for up to 23.9 months. Kaplan-Meier and exploratory Cox analyses were used.ResultsBoth groups improved. At 6 and 12 months, the suture group had better Japanese Orthopaedic Association and Oswestry Disability Index scores, whereas 12-month pain scores were similar. Symptomatic recurrence occurred in 13/51 controls (25.49%) and 4/51 suture patients (7.84%; P = 0.017). Eighteen-month recurrence-free estimates were 75.2% (95% CI 59.2%-85.6%) and 94.9% (95% CI 80.3%-98.7%), respectively (log-rank P = 0.028). Reoperation (10/51 vs 4/51; P = 0.084) and complications (4/51 vs 3/51) did not differ significantly. Subgroup estimates were limited by only 17 events.ConclusionsAnnular suture was associated with better short-to midterm function and fewer symptomatic recurrences, but causality and long-term effectiveness remain uncertain. Larger multicenter studies with longer, imaging-based follow-up are required.

经皮内窥镜下腰椎间盘切除术联合环缝与单独PELD治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出:一项前瞻性倾向评分匹配队列研究。
背景:经皮内窥镜腰椎间盘切除术(PELD)后症状性同水平复发仍然是一个值得关注的问题。我们比较了PELD +内镜环形缝合与单独PELD。方法该单中心前瞻性观察队列从2023年1月至2024年10月纳入患者。通过共同的临床-患者决策来选择治疗方案。基于8个基线变量的倾向评分按1:1匹配,每组产生51例患者。临床评分持续12个月;症状复发随访达23.9个月。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和探索性Cox分析。结果两组均有改善。在6个月和12个月时,缝线组有更好的日本骨科协会和Oswestry残疾指数评分,而12个月疼痛评分相似。对照组13/51(25.49%)和缝合组4/51 (7.84%,P = 0.017)出现症状性复发。18个月无复发估计分别为75.2% (95% CI 59.2%-85.6%)和94.9% (95% CI 80.3%-98.7%) (log-rank P = 0.028)。再手术(10/51 vs 4/51; P = 0.084)和并发症(4/51 vs 3/51)无显著差异。亚组估计仅受17个事件的限制。结论环形缝合术具有较好的中短期功能和较低的症状复发率,但其因果关系和远期疗效尚不明确。需要更大规模的多中心研究和更长时间的影像学随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery is an open access peer-reviewed journal publishing original reviews and research articles on all aspects of orthopaedic surgery. It is the official journal of the Asia Pacific Orthopaedic Association. The journal welcomes and will publish materials of a diverse nature, from basic science research to clinical trials and surgical techniques. The journal encourages contributions from all parts of the world, but special emphasis is given to research of particular relevance to the Asia Pacific region.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书