Self-Reported Preparedness and Perceived Challenges in Managing Medical Emergencies Among Dentists at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A Cross Sectional Study.
Anabella Koteikai Kotey, Joseph Abu-Sakyi, Manuella-Krysty Asabea Siaw, John Billy Owusu Quarshie, Nana Atuahene Oti, Nana Bempong Owusu-Ankomah, Samuel Baffour-Awuah, Kwabena Opoku Owusu-Ansah, Elijah Kwegyir Johnson, Kwame Adu Okyere Boadu
{"title":"Self-Reported Preparedness and Perceived Challenges in Managing Medical Emergencies Among Dentists at Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Ghana: A Cross Sectional Study.","authors":"Anabella Koteikai Kotey, Joseph Abu-Sakyi, Manuella-Krysty Asabea Siaw, John Billy Owusu Quarshie, Nana Atuahene Oti, Nana Bempong Owusu-Ankomah, Samuel Baffour-Awuah, Kwabena Opoku Owusu-Ansah, Elijah Kwegyir Johnson, Kwame Adu Okyere Boadu","doi":"10.1002/puh2.70359","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medical emergencies in dental settings are uncommon but potentially life-threatening, and the response depends on practitioner training, institutional protocols and available equipment. Little has been published on these elements in Ghanaian dental services. This study described self-reported emergency encounters, training status, protocol awareness, equipment availability and perceived challenges at one tertiary facility.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Oral Health Directorate, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi. All 78 dentists on the roster were approached (attempted census); 62 returned completed self-administered questionnaires over 14 consecutive working days (response rate 79.5%). All variables were categorical, summarised as frequencies and percentages. Associations of rank and years of practice with formal emergency-management training status were examined using <i>χ</i> <sup>2</sup> tests with Yates' correction and Fisher's exact test with odds ratios (ORs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Percentages denote the proportion of 62 respondents reporting each multiple-response item, not the frequency of events among patients. Hypoglycaemia (87.1%) and syncope (79.0%) were most often reported as ever encountered, then asthma attack (69.4%), seizures (62.9%) and anaphylaxis (48.4%). Thirty-six (58.1%) reported formal training, 22 (35.5%) a written protocol and none an automated external defibrillator (AED). Training was reported more often by senior than junior dentists (69.2% vs. 39.1%; <i>p</i> = 0.040; OR 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-10.29); the association with years of practice was borderline and test-dependent (Yates-corrected <i>p</i> = 0.052; Fisher's exact <i>p</i> = 0.039; OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.12-9.15). Commonest challenges were inadequate equipment (87.1%), lack of training (72.6%) and no clear protocol (69.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Two in five dentists reported no formal emergency-management training, most were unaware of a written protocol, and none reported access to an AED. These self-reported, single-centre findings suggest that periodic training, written protocols and verified equipment stocks merit institutional attention; confirmation in larger multi-centre studies is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":74613,"journal":{"name":"Public health challenges","volume":"5 3","pages":"e70359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13544989/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public health challenges","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/puh2.70359","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Medical emergencies in dental settings are uncommon but potentially life-threatening, and the response depends on practitioner training, institutional protocols and available equipment. Little has been published on these elements in Ghanaian dental services. This study described self-reported emergency encounters, training status, protocol awareness, equipment availability and perceived challenges at one tertiary facility.
Methodology: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at the Oral Health Directorate, Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi. All 78 dentists on the roster were approached (attempted census); 62 returned completed self-administered questionnaires over 14 consecutive working days (response rate 79.5%). All variables were categorical, summarised as frequencies and percentages. Associations of rank and years of practice with formal emergency-management training status were examined using χ2 tests with Yates' correction and Fisher's exact test with odds ratios (ORs).
Results: Percentages denote the proportion of 62 respondents reporting each multiple-response item, not the frequency of events among patients. Hypoglycaemia (87.1%) and syncope (79.0%) were most often reported as ever encountered, then asthma attack (69.4%), seizures (62.9%) and anaphylaxis (48.4%). Thirty-six (58.1%) reported formal training, 22 (35.5%) a written protocol and none an automated external defibrillator (AED). Training was reported more often by senior than junior dentists (69.2% vs. 39.1%; p = 0.040; OR 3.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-10.29); the association with years of practice was borderline and test-dependent (Yates-corrected p = 0.052; Fisher's exact p = 0.039; OR 3.20, 95% CI 1.12-9.15). Commonest challenges were inadequate equipment (87.1%), lack of training (72.6%) and no clear protocol (69.4%).
Conclusion: Two in five dentists reported no formal emergency-management training, most were unaware of a written protocol, and none reported access to an AED. These self-reported, single-centre findings suggest that periodic training, written protocols and verified equipment stocks merit institutional attention; confirmation in larger multi-centre studies is needed.