Enhancing person-centered obstetric care: A qualitative grounded theory study on perception formation and sense-making during childbirth.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2026-09-04 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/226885
Mi-Ran Okumu, Lisa Bach, Lissa Haid-Schmallenberg, Ute Karbach, Lorna McKee, Natalie R Stevens, Anna Volkert, Nadine Scholten
{"title":"Enhancing person-centered obstetric care: A qualitative grounded theory study on perception formation and sense-making during childbirth.","authors":"Mi-Ran Okumu, Lisa Bach, Lissa Haid-Schmallenberg, Ute Karbach, Lorna McKee, Natalie R Stevens, Anna Volkert, Nadine Scholten","doi":"10.18332/ejm/226885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Quality of obstetric care comprises both provision and experience of care, yet patient experiences have received less attention. Person-centered care seeks to tackle this gap by attributing equal significance to clinical outcomes and care experiences. Individual experiences vary despite similar treatments because subjective appraisals differ. Understanding this process can help to enhance person-centered care in obstetrics. The study's aim is to explore how birthing persons perceive and make sense of obstetric care experiences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The qualitative study adopted a grounded theory approach according to Corbin and Strauss, utilizing 12 narrative interviews with mothers who gave birth in a hospital a maximum 12 months prior. They were recruited through iterative theoretical sampling through the project Instagram channel between March and August 2023. The iterative process of data collection, analysis and constant comparison resulted in a theoretical model explaining how parturients experience obstetric situations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During analysis, sense of coherence (SoC) emerged as core category shaping how parturients perceive and make sense of obstetric situations: negative experiences related to low manifestations of SoC and positive experiences to high SoC. A subsequent literature review linked these empirical findings to Antonovsky's SoC which was contextually adapted to the perception of obstetric situations shaped by comprehensibility, perceived manageability and contextual framing factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Recognizing how parturients construct meaning through their situational SoC, may offer a basis for reflections on interaction with them. Though not allowing for direct generalization, the findings may offer a theoretical concept for further research targeting situational SoC during care processes or piloting feasible measures for real-time assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13544188/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/226885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Quality of obstetric care comprises both provision and experience of care, yet patient experiences have received less attention. Person-centered care seeks to tackle this gap by attributing equal significance to clinical outcomes and care experiences. Individual experiences vary despite similar treatments because subjective appraisals differ. Understanding this process can help to enhance person-centered care in obstetrics. The study's aim is to explore how birthing persons perceive and make sense of obstetric care experiences.

Methods: The qualitative study adopted a grounded theory approach according to Corbin and Strauss, utilizing 12 narrative interviews with mothers who gave birth in a hospital a maximum 12 months prior. They were recruited through iterative theoretical sampling through the project Instagram channel between March and August 2023. The iterative process of data collection, analysis and constant comparison resulted in a theoretical model explaining how parturients experience obstetric situations.

Results: During analysis, sense of coherence (SoC) emerged as core category shaping how parturients perceive and make sense of obstetric situations: negative experiences related to low manifestations of SoC and positive experiences to high SoC. A subsequent literature review linked these empirical findings to Antonovsky's SoC which was contextually adapted to the perception of obstetric situations shaped by comprehensibility, perceived manageability and contextual framing factors.

Conclusions: Recognizing how parturients construct meaning through their situational SoC, may offer a basis for reflections on interaction with them. Though not allowing for direct generalization, the findings may offer a theoretical concept for further research targeting situational SoC during care processes or piloting feasible measures for real-time assessment.

加强以人为本的产科护理:分娩过程中感知形成和意义形成的定性扎根理论研究。
导言:产科护理的质量包括提供和护理的经验,但病人的经验受到较少的关注。以人为本的护理旨在通过赋予临床结果和护理经验同等的重要性来解决这一差距。尽管治疗方法相似,但由于主观评价不同,个体的经历也不同。了解这一过程有助于加强产科以人为本的护理。该研究的目的是探索分娩人员如何感知和理解产科护理经验。方法:质性研究根据Corbin和Strauss的理论,采用扎根理论的方法,对在医院分娩最多12个月的母亲进行了12次叙述性访谈。他们是在2023年3月至8月期间通过项目Instagram渠道通过迭代理论抽样招募的。数据收集、分析和不断比较的迭代过程产生了一个解释产妇如何经历产科情况的理论模型。结果:在分析过程中,连贯性意识(SoC)成为影响产妇如何感知和理解产科情况的核心类别:低SoC表现相关的负面体验和高SoC表现相关的积极体验。随后的文献综述将这些实证研究结果与Antonovsky的SoC联系起来,该SoC在语境上适应于由可理解性、可感知的可管理性和语境框架因素塑造的产科情况的感知。结论:认识到父母如何通过情境SoC构建意义,可以为反思与他们的互动提供基础。虽然不能直接推广,但研究结果可能为进一步研究护理过程中的情境SoC或试行实时评估的可行措施提供理论概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书