Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as fourth-line pharmacological therapy in patients with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in the USA.

IF 12.8 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2026-08-29 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104176
Zhejia Tian, Jonas M Willerding, Kai M Schmidt-Ott, Anette Melk, Bernhard M W Schmidt
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of GLP-1 receptor agonists versus mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists as fourth-line pharmacological therapy in patients with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity: a retrospective multicenter cohort study in the USA.","authors":"Zhejia Tian, Jonas M Willerding, Kai M Schmidt-Ott, Anette Melk, Bernhard M W Schmidt","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the guideline-recommended therapy for resistant hypertension. Resistant hypertension is particularly common in individuals with overweight or obesity. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) induce substantial weight loss and reduce cardiovascular and renal events, with modest reductions in blood pressure. Whether GLP-1RAs provide benefit as an alternative therapeutic strategy in patients with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity is unknown. We compared the effectiveness of GLP-1RAs and MRAs as fourth-line pharmacologic therapy in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective multicenter cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network including 67 healthcare organizations, female and male adults with overweight or obesity and resistant hypertension (uncontrolled blood pressure despite ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium antagonists and diuretics) initiating a fourth-line pharmacological therapy between 01 June 2017 and 31 March 2025 were identified and included. Patients initiating GLP-1RAs (semaglutide or tirzepatide) were compared with those initiating MRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney outcomes, and blood pressure changes. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics. Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Among 213,309 eligible patients, 22,694 initiated GLP-1RAs and 5673 initiated MRAs. After propensity score matching, 4153 patients remained in each group. During a median follow-up of 1.4 years, GLP-1RA therapy was associated with lower risks of MACE (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.78), all-cause mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55), cardiovascular events (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92), major adverse kidney events (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88), and acute kidney injury (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) compared with MRAs. Systolic blood pressure reductions at 12 weeks were similar (-5.7 [95% CI -4.0 to -7.4] mmHg versus -6.3 [95% CI -4.7 to -8.0] mmHg).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In our retrospective study, among adults with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity, GLP-1RA was associated with lower cardiovascular and kidney risk compared with MRAs despite smaller blood pressure reductions. GLP-1RAs may represent a potential alternative or complementary therapeutic option in this population. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether GLP-1RAs should be incorporated into treatment strategies for resistant hypertension in patients with overweight or obesity.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"99 ","pages":"104176"},"PeriodicalIF":12.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13545350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2026.104176","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are the guideline-recommended therapy for resistant hypertension. Resistant hypertension is particularly common in individuals with overweight or obesity. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) induce substantial weight loss and reduce cardiovascular and renal events, with modest reductions in blood pressure. Whether GLP-1RAs provide benefit as an alternative therapeutic strategy in patients with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity is unknown. We compared the effectiveness of GLP-1RAs and MRAs as fourth-line pharmacologic therapy in this population.

Methods: In this retrospective multicenter cohort study using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network including 67 healthcare organizations, female and male adults with overweight or obesity and resistant hypertension (uncontrolled blood pressure despite ACE-inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, calcium antagonists and diuretics) initiating a fourth-line pharmacological therapy between 01 June 2017 and 31 March 2025 were identified and included. Patients initiating GLP-1RAs (semaglutide or tirzepatide) were compared with those initiating MRAs (spironolactone or eplerenone). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) during 2-year follow-up. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney outcomes, and blood pressure changes. Propensity score matching balanced baseline characteristics. Outcomes were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.

Findings: Among 213,309 eligible patients, 22,694 initiated GLP-1RAs and 5673 initiated MRAs. After propensity score matching, 4153 patients remained in each group. During a median follow-up of 1.4 years, GLP-1RA therapy was associated with lower risks of MACE (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.78), all-cause mortality (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55), cardiovascular events (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92), major adverse kidney events (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88), and acute kidney injury (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83) compared with MRAs. Systolic blood pressure reductions at 12 weeks were similar (-5.7 [95% CI -4.0 to -7.4] mmHg versus -6.3 [95% CI -4.7 to -8.0] mmHg).

Interpretation: In our retrospective study, among adults with resistant hypertension and overweight or obesity, GLP-1RA was associated with lower cardiovascular and kidney risk compared with MRAs despite smaller blood pressure reductions. GLP-1RAs may represent a potential alternative or complementary therapeutic option in this population. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether GLP-1RAs should be incorporated into treatment strategies for resistant hypertension in patients with overweight or obesity.

Funding: None.

GLP-1受体激动剂与矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂作为第4线药物治疗顽固性高血压和超重或肥胖患者的疗效比较:美国一项回顾性多中心队列研究
背景:矿化皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)是顽固性高血压的指南推荐治疗。顽固性高血压在超重或肥胖人群中尤为常见。胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)可显著减轻体重,减少心血管和肾脏事件,并适度降低血压。GLP-1RAs作为一种替代治疗策略是否对顽固性高血压和超重或肥胖患者有益尚不清楚。我们比较了GLP-1RAs和MRAs作为第4线药物治疗在该人群中的有效性。方法:在这项使用TriNetX美国协作网络的回顾性多中心队列研究中,包括67家医疗机构,在2017年6月1日至2025年3月31日期间,确定并纳入了超重或肥胖和顽固性高血压(尽管使用ace抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、钙拮抗剂和利尿剂,血压仍未控制)的成年女性和男性,并开始了第4线药物治疗。将启动GLP-1RAs(西马鲁肽或替西帕肽)的患者与启动mra(螺内酯或依普利酮)的患者进行比较。主要终点为2年随访期间的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)。次要结局包括全因死亡率、心血管事件、肾脏结局和血压变化。倾向评分匹配平衡基线特征。使用Kaplan-Meier估计和Cox比例风险模型分析结果。结果:在213,309例符合条件的患者中,22,694例启动GLP-1RAs, 5673例启动mra。倾向评分匹配后,每组仍有4153例患者。在中位随访1.4年期间,与MRAs相比,GLP-1RA治疗与MACE (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.78)、全因死亡率(HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.21-0.55)、心血管事件(HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.59-0.92)、主要不良肾脏事件(HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88)和急性肾损伤(HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.46-0.83)的风险较低相关。12周收缩压降低相似(-5.7 [95% CI -4.0至-7.4]mmHg vs -6.3 [95% CI -4.7至-8.0]mmHg)。解释:在我们的回顾性研究中,在顽固性高血压和超重或肥胖的成年人中,GLP-1RA与MRAs相比,尽管血压降低幅度较小,但心血管和肾脏风险较低。GLP-1RAs可能是该人群潜在的替代或补充治疗选择。需要前瞻性研究来确定GLP-1RAs是否应纳入超重或肥胖患者的顽固性高血压的治疗策略。资金:没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书