How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Lou Dietrich, Niklas Lackner, Andre Karius, Johann Brand, Rafael Lobao, Aliheydar Huseynli, Oliver J Ott, Stefanie Corradini, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Maya Shariff
{"title":"How reliable is deep inspiration breath hold at CT simulation? Clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training in breast cancer radiotherapy.","authors":"Lou Dietrich, Niklas Lackner, Andre Karius, Johann Brand, Rafael Lobao, Aliheydar Huseynli, Oliver J Ott, Stefanie Corradini, Rainer Fietkau, Christoph Bert, Maya Shariff","doi":"10.1186/s13014-026-02920-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. However, the reliability of DIBH at CT simulation, has not been systematically evaluated despite the importance of CT simulation as the basis for treatment planning. We investigated the clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training on DIBH reliability and cardiac dose sparing.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective cohort study, 115 breast cancer patients undergoing DIBH CT simulation were analyzed before and after implementation of surface-guided breathing training using an SGRT system. DIBH performance was quantified by partial lung volume increase (PLVI) and breath-hold variability. Correlations between external surface motion and internal DIBH depth were assessed. Cardiac dose metrics were compared, with a subgroup analysis for patients receiving lymphatic drainage area (LDA) irradiation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prior to training, insufficient DIBH CTs-including negative PLVI cases-were observed. After training implementation, all CT scans were acquired in intended breath-hold states, eliminating insufficient DIBH acquisitions. Mean PLVI increased by ~ 9%, and breath-hold variability decreased by ~ 26%. Sternum motion correlated most strongly with PLVI, with multiregion surface monitoring yielding the highest internal correlation. These improvements were reflected in significant reductions in cardiac dose, particularly in the LDA subgroup, with selected heart dose metrics reduced up to 96%, while maintaining target coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DIBH at CT simulation with surface-guided breathing training proves to be reliable. The training prevents planning CTs in wrong breathing states and thus enables clinically meaningful cardiac dose reduction in breast radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":49639,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Oncology","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13014-026-02920-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is widely used to reduce cardiac dose in left-sided breast radiotherapy. However, the reliability of DIBH at CT simulation, has not been systematically evaluated despite the importance of CT simulation as the basis for treatment planning. We investigated the clinical impact of surface-guided breathing training on DIBH reliability and cardiac dose sparing.

Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, 115 breast cancer patients undergoing DIBH CT simulation were analyzed before and after implementation of surface-guided breathing training using an SGRT system. DIBH performance was quantified by partial lung volume increase (PLVI) and breath-hold variability. Correlations between external surface motion and internal DIBH depth were assessed. Cardiac dose metrics were compared, with a subgroup analysis for patients receiving lymphatic drainage area (LDA) irradiation.

Results: Prior to training, insufficient DIBH CTs-including negative PLVI cases-were observed. After training implementation, all CT scans were acquired in intended breath-hold states, eliminating insufficient DIBH acquisitions. Mean PLVI increased by ~ 9%, and breath-hold variability decreased by ~ 26%. Sternum motion correlated most strongly with PLVI, with multiregion surface monitoring yielding the highest internal correlation. These improvements were reflected in significant reductions in cardiac dose, particularly in the LDA subgroup, with selected heart dose metrics reduced up to 96%, while maintaining target coverage.

Conclusions: DIBH at CT simulation with surface-guided breathing training proves to be reliable. The training prevents planning CTs in wrong breathing states and thus enables clinically meaningful cardiac dose reduction in breast radiotherapy.

CT模拟中深吸气屏气的可靠性如何?表面引导呼吸训练对乳腺癌放疗的临床影响。
目的:深吸气屏气(DIBH)在左侧乳腺放疗中广泛应用于降低心脏剂量。然而,尽管CT模拟作为治疗计划的基础很重要,但CT模拟中DIBH的可靠性尚未得到系统评估。我们研究了表面引导呼吸训练对DIBH可靠性和心脏剂量节约的临床影响。方法:在本回顾性队列研究中,对115例接受DIBH CT模拟的乳腺癌患者在使用SGRT系统进行表面引导呼吸训练前后进行分析。DIBH表现通过部分肺容积增加(PLVI)和屏气变异性来量化。评估了外表面运动与内部DIBH深度之间的相关性。心脏剂量指标进行比较,并对接受淋巴引流区(LDA)照射的患者进行亚组分析。结果:训练前,观察到DIBH ct不足,包括阴性PLVI病例。训练实施后,所有CT扫描都在预期的屏气状态下获得,消除了DIBH获取不足的问题。平均PLVI增加了~ 9%,憋气变异性减少了~ 26%。胸骨运动与PLVI相关性最强,多区域表面监测的内部相关性最高。这些改善反映在心脏剂量的显著减少上,特别是在LDA亚组中,选定的心脏剂量指标减少了96%,同时保持了目标覆盖率。结论:DIBH在CT模拟与表面引导呼吸训练证明是可靠的。该培训可防止在错误的呼吸状态下规划ct,从而使乳腺放射治疗中临床上有意义的心脏剂量减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiation Oncology
Radiation Oncology ONCOLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.80%
发文量
181
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Oncology encompasses all aspects of research that impacts on the treatment of cancer using radiation. It publishes findings in molecular and cellular radiation biology, radiation physics, radiation technology, and clinical oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书