Susan P Y Wong, Olivia Gaughran, David K Prince, Jane Schell, Daniel Y Lam, Dawn Bates, Grady Paden, Erin K Kross
{"title":"A Randomized Pilot Trial of a Nephrologist Communication Tool for Discussing Conservative Management.","authors":"Susan P Y Wong, Olivia Gaughran, David K Prince, Jane Schell, Daniel Y Lam, Dawn Bates, Grady Paden, Erin K Kross","doi":"10.2215/CJN.0000001213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Key points: </strong>Conservative kidney management is infrequently presented to patients as a treatment option for kidney failure. Conservative Kidney Management Jumpstart Tool is a communication tool that helps nephrologists discuss patients' values and care options. The tool improved discussions about values and conservative management with patients.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>It is difficult for patients to make informed decisions about kidney failure unless they know all their treatment options. Conservative management is an important option infrequently presented alongside other kidney failure treatments by nephrologists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a randomized pilot trial testing the feasibility and acceptability of a communication tool, called the Conservative Kidney Management Jumpstart Tool, in assisting nephrologists with discussing conservative management with their patients. We recruited patients aged 75 years or older with stage 4 or 5 CKD in the greater Seattle area between April 2023 and May 2025. Patients were randomized in 1:1 fashion to either their nephrologists receiving the tool to use with them at their next clinic visit (intervention) or usual care (control). Our primary outcome and feasibility measure was patient-reported discussion of conservative management during the clinic visit. Our secondary outcome and acceptability measure was change in patients' satisfaction with their nephrologist's serious illness communication skills (using the Quality of Communication Scale, with higher scores indicating higher quality) before and after the visit. We performed an intent-to-treat analysis of the primary end point using a chi-squared test. We used paired-samples t tests to assess within-patient changes in the secondary end point.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We randomized 74 patients (age 80±1, 19% women, 69% White) to either the control ( n =37) or intervention ( n =37) group. Patients whose nephrologists received the tool were more likely to discuss conservative management during their clinic visit (60% versus 19%, P = 0.001) than patients in the control group. Patients whose nephrologists received the tool rated their nephrologist's communication skills at 7.5±2.1 before the visit and 9.0±1.7 after the visit ( P < 0.001) as compared with 7.8±1.9 and 7.9±1.8 ( P = 0.54), respectively, among patients in the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The tool was feasible and acceptable to patients, promoting patient-nephrologist discussion of conservative management and improving patients' satisfaction with their nephrologist's communication skills.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registry name and registration number: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05753020 .</p>","PeriodicalId":520592,"journal":{"name":"Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.0000001213","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Key points: Conservative kidney management is infrequently presented to patients as a treatment option for kidney failure. Conservative Kidney Management Jumpstart Tool is a communication tool that helps nephrologists discuss patients' values and care options. The tool improved discussions about values and conservative management with patients.
Background: It is difficult for patients to make informed decisions about kidney failure unless they know all their treatment options. Conservative management is an important option infrequently presented alongside other kidney failure treatments by nephrologists.
Methods: We conducted a randomized pilot trial testing the feasibility and acceptability of a communication tool, called the Conservative Kidney Management Jumpstart Tool, in assisting nephrologists with discussing conservative management with their patients. We recruited patients aged 75 years or older with stage 4 or 5 CKD in the greater Seattle area between April 2023 and May 2025. Patients were randomized in 1:1 fashion to either their nephrologists receiving the tool to use with them at their next clinic visit (intervention) or usual care (control). Our primary outcome and feasibility measure was patient-reported discussion of conservative management during the clinic visit. Our secondary outcome and acceptability measure was change in patients' satisfaction with their nephrologist's serious illness communication skills (using the Quality of Communication Scale, with higher scores indicating higher quality) before and after the visit. We performed an intent-to-treat analysis of the primary end point using a chi-squared test. We used paired-samples t tests to assess within-patient changes in the secondary end point.
Results: We randomized 74 patients (age 80±1, 19% women, 69% White) to either the control ( n =37) or intervention ( n =37) group. Patients whose nephrologists received the tool were more likely to discuss conservative management during their clinic visit (60% versus 19%, P = 0.001) than patients in the control group. Patients whose nephrologists received the tool rated their nephrologist's communication skills at 7.5±2.1 before the visit and 9.0±1.7 after the visit ( P < 0.001) as compared with 7.8±1.9 and 7.9±1.8 ( P = 0.54), respectively, among patients in the control group.
Conclusions: The tool was feasible and acceptable to patients, promoting patient-nephrologist discussion of conservative management and improving patients' satisfaction with their nephrologist's communication skills.
Clinical trial registry name and registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05753020 .
背景:除非患者知道所有的治疗方案,否则他们很难对肾衰竭做出明智的决定。保守治疗是一个重要的选择,但很少与肾内科医生提出的其他肾衰竭治疗一起。方法:我们进行了一项随机试验,测试一种称为保守肾管理Jumpstart工具的沟通工具的可行性和可接受性,以协助肾病学家与患者讨论保守管理。我们招募了2023年4月至2025年5月在大西雅图地区年龄≥75岁的4期或5期慢性肾脏疾病患者。患者以1:1的方式随机分配给接受该工具的肾病学家,以便在下次就诊时与他们一起使用(干预)或常规护理(对照组)。我们的主要结果和可行性措施是在门诊就诊时患者报告的保守治疗的讨论。我们的次要结局和可接受性测量指标是患者在就诊前后对肾病医生的严重疾病沟通技巧的满意度变化(使用沟通质量量表,得分越高表示质量越高)。我们使用卡方检验对主要终点进行意向治疗分析。我们使用配对样本t检验来评估次要终点的患者内部变化。结果:74例患者(年龄80±1岁,女性19%,白人69%)随机分为对照组(n=37)和干预组(n=37)。与对照组相比,接受工具治疗的患者更有可能在门诊就诊时讨论保守治疗(60% vs. 19%, p=0.001)。使用该工具的患者对其肾病专家的沟通能力评分为:访前7.5±2.1分,访后9.0±1.7分(p)结论:该工具对患者可行且可接受,促进了患者与肾病专家对保守治疗的讨论,提高了患者对肾病专家沟通能力的满意度。