Supporting mental health during pregnancy: The feasibility of a combined peer support and mindfulness intervention, a quasi-experimental pre-post feasibility study.

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
European Journal of Midwifery Pub Date : 2026-09-02 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.18332/ejm/226733
Sudjit Liblub, Karen McLaughlin, Kirsty Pringle, Allison Cummins
{"title":"Supporting mental health during pregnancy: The feasibility of a combined peer support and mindfulness intervention, a quasi-experimental pre-post feasibility study.","authors":"Sudjit Liblub, Karen McLaughlin, Kirsty Pringle, Allison Cummins","doi":"10.18332/ejm/226733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Pregnancy is a critical period of heightened vulnerability to mental health challenges. Peer support and mindfulness have individually shown promise as non-pharmacological perinatal mental health strategies, yet their combined potential remains underexplored. This study evaluated the feasibility of a novel intervention integrating peer support with a mindfulness application.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quasi-experimental pre-post feasibility design was conducted between April 2024 and January 2025 at an antenatal clinic in a public hospital in New South Wales, Australia, using convenience sampling across two sequential recruitment phases. The 4-week intervention combined mutual peer support sessions with guided mindfulness practice via the Headspace app, enrolling pregnant women at elevated risk of anxiety and depression (priority group) and those from the general pregnant population. Validated self-report measures (DASS-21, FFMQ-15, MSPSS) and salivary cortisol samples were collected pre- and post-intervention. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests examined within- and between-group changes; open-ended post-intervention survey responses were analyzed using content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen pregnant women participated, achieving a 100% retention rate despite recruitment challenges. A statistically significant reduction in stress was observed in the general group compared to the priority group (median [IQR]: 22 [14-30] vs 8 [2-20]; p<0.050). No significant pre-to-post changes were found in anxiety, depression, mindfulness, or perceived social support in either group (p>0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted that the intervention fostered emotional support, connectedness, and mindfulness engagement, with participants expressing willingness to recommend the program.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining peer support with a mindfulness application appears feasible and acceptable for pregnant women and warrants evaluation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":32920,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Midwifery","volume":"10 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13539764/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/226733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Pregnancy is a critical period of heightened vulnerability to mental health challenges. Peer support and mindfulness have individually shown promise as non-pharmacological perinatal mental health strategies, yet their combined potential remains underexplored. This study evaluated the feasibility of a novel intervention integrating peer support with a mindfulness application.

Methods: A quasi-experimental pre-post feasibility design was conducted between April 2024 and January 2025 at an antenatal clinic in a public hospital in New South Wales, Australia, using convenience sampling across two sequential recruitment phases. The 4-week intervention combined mutual peer support sessions with guided mindfulness practice via the Headspace app, enrolling pregnant women at elevated risk of anxiety and depression (priority group) and those from the general pregnant population. Validated self-report measures (DASS-21, FFMQ-15, MSPSS) and salivary cortisol samples were collected pre- and post-intervention. Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U tests examined within- and between-group changes; open-ended post-intervention survey responses were analyzed using content analysis.

Results: Thirteen pregnant women participated, achieving a 100% retention rate despite recruitment challenges. A statistically significant reduction in stress was observed in the general group compared to the priority group (median [IQR]: 22 [14-30] vs 8 [2-20]; p<0.050). No significant pre-to-post changes were found in anxiety, depression, mindfulness, or perceived social support in either group (p>0.05). Qualitative findings highlighted that the intervention fostered emotional support, connectedness, and mindfulness engagement, with participants expressing willingness to recommend the program.

Conclusions: Combining peer support with a mindfulness application appears feasible and acceptable for pregnant women and warrants evaluation in adequately powered randomized controlled trials.

支持怀孕期间的心理健康:同伴支持和正念干预相结合的可行性,一项准实验前后可行性研究。
妊娠期是心理健康挑战的关键时期。同伴支持和正念作为非药物围产期心理健康策略已经单独显示出希望,但它们的综合潜力仍未得到充分开发。本研究评估了一种将同伴支持与正念应用相结合的新型干预的可行性。方法:于2024年4月至2025年1月在澳大利亚新南威尔士州一家公立医院产前门诊进行准实验性岗前可行性设计,采用方便抽样的方法,分两个顺序招募阶段进行。为期四周的干预结合了通过Headspace应用程序进行的同伴互助会议和引导正念练习,招募了焦虑和抑郁风险较高的孕妇(优先组)和普通孕妇。在干预前和干预后收集经验证的自我报告量表(DASS-21、FFMQ-15、MSPSS)和唾液皮质醇样本。Wilcoxon sign -rank检验和Mann-Whitney U检验检验了组内和组间变化;采用内容分析法对开放式干预后调查结果进行分析。结果:13名孕妇参与,尽管招聘面临挑战,但保留率达到100%。与优先组相比,普通组的应激降低具有统计学意义(中位数[IQR]: 22 [14-30] vs 8 [2-20]; p0.05)。定性研究结果强调,干预培养了情感支持、连通性和正念参与,参与者表示愿意推荐该计划。结论:将同伴支持与正念应用相结合对孕妇来说是可行和可接受的,值得在充分有力的随机对照试验中进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Midwifery
European Journal of Midwifery Nursing-Maternity and Midwifery
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书