Understanding Suicide through Coroners' Narratives: implications for primary care from a mixed‑methods study of 157 Coroners' reports.

IF 5.2
Phillip Oliver, Emily Reed, Joe Hulin, Brigitte Delaney, Jack Marshall, Caroline Mitchell
{"title":"Understanding Suicide through Coroners' Narratives: implications for primary care from a mixed‑methods study of 157 Coroners' reports.","authors":"Phillip Oliver, Emily Reed, Joe Hulin, Brigitte Delaney, Jack Marshall, Caroline Mitchell","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2026.0207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide is a major public health concern, and general practice is often a recent point of contact before death. While mental illness is well recognised, the broader social and contextual factors influencing suicide risk remain under-reported in primary care and epidemiological research Aim To describe the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of individuals who died by suicide, integrating coronial quantitative data with qualitative narrative accounts to identify implications for primary/ secondary care and public health. Design and setting Explanatory sequential mixed‑methods study of 157 consecutive deaths by suicide recorded by coroners (2018-19) across five English local authorities. Method Demographic, clinical, and social data were extracted from coroners' records and summarised descriptively. Narrative case summaries were coded and analysed thematically to identify contextual, relational, and service factors preceding death. Results Of 157 individuals: 79% were male; 65% lived in the most deprived IMD quintile; 85% had a diagnosed mental health condition; 62% had a long‑term physical illness; 41% had a previous suicide attempt. About half consulted a GP in the preceding three months; mental health featured in about half of those consultations. Common stressors were relationship breakdown (37.2%), housing instability (22.1%), and work pressures (18.2%). Seven interlinked themes were identified: Mental health; Alcohol/Substance use, Physical health; Social connectedness; Life course trauma, Socioeconomic and Structural Vulnerability; Healthcare access. Service transitions were key vulnerability points Conclusion Coroners' records offer important insights into the complex circumstances preceding suicide and highlight opportunities for GPs to recognise intersectional complexity and support integrated, cross-sector suicide prevention approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2026.0207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide is a major public health concern, and general practice is often a recent point of contact before death. While mental illness is well recognised, the broader social and contextual factors influencing suicide risk remain under-reported in primary care and epidemiological research Aim To describe the demographic, clinical, and psychosocial characteristics of individuals who died by suicide, integrating coronial quantitative data with qualitative narrative accounts to identify implications for primary/ secondary care and public health. Design and setting Explanatory sequential mixed‑methods study of 157 consecutive deaths by suicide recorded by coroners (2018-19) across five English local authorities. Method Demographic, clinical, and social data were extracted from coroners' records and summarised descriptively. Narrative case summaries were coded and analysed thematically to identify contextual, relational, and service factors preceding death. Results Of 157 individuals: 79% were male; 65% lived in the most deprived IMD quintile; 85% had a diagnosed mental health condition; 62% had a long‑term physical illness; 41% had a previous suicide attempt. About half consulted a GP in the preceding three months; mental health featured in about half of those consultations. Common stressors were relationship breakdown (37.2%), housing instability (22.1%), and work pressures (18.2%). Seven interlinked themes were identified: Mental health; Alcohol/Substance use, Physical health; Social connectedness; Life course trauma, Socioeconomic and Structural Vulnerability; Healthcare access. Service transitions were key vulnerability points Conclusion Coroners' records offer important insights into the complex circumstances preceding suicide and highlight opportunities for GPs to recognise intersectional complexity and support integrated, cross-sector suicide prevention approaches.

通过验尸官的叙述理解自杀:对157名验尸官报告的混合方法研究对初级保健的影响。
自杀是一个主要的公共卫生问题,一般做法往往是死亡前最近的接触点。虽然精神疾病得到了很好的认识,但在初级保健和流行病学研究中,影响自杀风险的更广泛的社会和背景因素仍未得到充分报道目的:描述自杀死亡个体的人口统计学、临床和社会心理特征,将冠状定量数据与定性叙述相结合,以确定对初级/二级保健和公共卫生的影响。设计和设置解释性顺序混合方法研究了英国五个地方当局验尸官记录的157例连续自杀死亡(2018-19)。方法从验尸记录中提取人口学、临床和社会资料,并进行描述性总结。对叙述性病例摘要进行编码并按主题进行分析,以确定死亡前的背景、关系和服务因素。结果157例:79%为男性;65%的人生活在最贫困的IMD五分之一;85%的人被诊断有精神健康问题;62%患有长期身体疾病;41%的人曾有过自杀企图。大约一半的人在前三个月咨询了全科医生;在这些咨询中,约有一半涉及心理健康问题。常见的压力源是关系破裂(37.2%)、住房不稳定(22.1%)和工作压力(18.2%)。确定了七个相互关联的主题:心理健康;酒精/药物使用,身体健康;社会连通性;生命历程创伤、社会经济和结构脆弱性;医疗访问。验尸官的记录为自杀前的复杂情况提供了重要的见解,并突出了全科医生认识到交叉复杂性和支持综合的跨部门自杀预防方法的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书