Improving practical steerability of a bidirectional steerable catheter for ERCP by non-straight wire routing.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Atsushi Yamada, Wataru Yonemichi, Ikuo Tooyama, Osamu Inatomi
{"title":"Improving practical steerability of a bidirectional steerable catheter for ERCP by non-straight wire routing.","authors":"Atsushi Yamada, Wataru Yonemichi, Ikuo Tooyama, Osamu Inatomi","doi":"10.1007/s11517-026-03670-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires reliable bile duct cannulation, yet steerability of wire-driven steerable catheters (SCs) can deteriorate when the shaft is constrained, partly because actuation may induce unintended shaft-side deformation and transmission loss. This study evaluated whether non-straight wire-routing architectures could improve practical steerability of a bidirectional SC for ERCP. Three prototypes were developed: a conventional straight-wiring design (SC#0), a non-straight, non-crossed design (SC#1), and a non-straight, crossed design (SC#2). Steerability was assessed by incremental wire-pulling tests under straight-shaft and loose-shaft conditions and by a mock ERCP study using an actual duodenoscope. Outcomes included the handle displacement and pulling force required to reach 85° distal bending (HD<sub>85</sub>, HPF<sub>85</sub>) and target-angle reachability. In the straight-shaft condition, SC#1 and SC#2 reduced HD<sub>85</sub> and HPF<sub>85</sub> by 54-63% and 63-65%, respectively, compared with SC#0. Under the loose-shaft condition, SC#0 reached 85° in only 1/5 trials, whereas SC#1 and SC#2 reached 85° in all trials. In the mock ERCP study, the proposed designs reduced HD<sub>85</sub> and HPF<sub>85</sub> by 57-71% and 57-62%, respectively, in both bending directions. These findings indicate that non-straight wire-routing architectures can be practically implemented in a bidirectional SC for ERCP and may improve steerability under ERCP-relevant constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03670-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires reliable bile duct cannulation, yet steerability of wire-driven steerable catheters (SCs) can deteriorate when the shaft is constrained, partly because actuation may induce unintended shaft-side deformation and transmission loss. This study evaluated whether non-straight wire-routing architectures could improve practical steerability of a bidirectional SC for ERCP. Three prototypes were developed: a conventional straight-wiring design (SC#0), a non-straight, non-crossed design (SC#1), and a non-straight, crossed design (SC#2). Steerability was assessed by incremental wire-pulling tests under straight-shaft and loose-shaft conditions and by a mock ERCP study using an actual duodenoscope. Outcomes included the handle displacement and pulling force required to reach 85° distal bending (HD85, HPF85) and target-angle reachability. In the straight-shaft condition, SC#1 and SC#2 reduced HD85 and HPF85 by 54-63% and 63-65%, respectively, compared with SC#0. Under the loose-shaft condition, SC#0 reached 85° in only 1/5 trials, whereas SC#1 and SC#2 reached 85° in all trials. In the mock ERCP study, the proposed designs reduced HD85 and HPF85 by 57-71% and 57-62%, respectively, in both bending directions. These findings indicate that non-straight wire-routing architectures can be practically implemented in a bidirectional SC for ERCP and may improve steerability under ERCP-relevant constraints.

采用非直导线敷设提高ERCP双向导尿管的实际导向性。
内窥镜逆行胆管造影(ERCP)需要可靠的胆管插管,然而当胆管轴受限时,线驱动的可操纵导管(SCs)的可操纵性会变差,部分原因是驱动可能会导致意想不到的轴侧变形和传输损失。本研究评估了非直线线路由架构是否可以提高ERCP双向SC的实际可操作性。设计了三种原型:传统的直线布线设计(sc# 0)、非直线、非交叉设计(sc# 1)和非直线、交叉设计(sc# 2)。通过直轴和松轴条件下的增量拉线试验以及使用实际十二指肠镜的模拟ERCP研究来评估可操纵性。结果包括手柄位移和达到85°远端弯曲所需的拉力(HD85, HPF85)和目标角度可达性。在直轴工况下,与sc# 0相比,sc# 1和sc# 2分别降低了HD85和HPF85的54-63%和63-65%。在松轴条件下,sc# 0仅在1/5的试验中达到85°,而sc# 1和sc# 2在所有试验中都达到85°。在模拟ERCP研究中,所提出的设计在两个弯曲方向上分别减少了57-71%和57-62%的HD85和HPF85。这些发现表明,非直线线路由架构可以在ERCP的双向SC中实际实现,并且可以提高ERCP相关约束下的可操作性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.10%
发文量
249
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging. MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field. MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书