{"title":"Improving practical steerability of a bidirectional steerable catheter for ERCP by non-straight wire routing.","authors":"Atsushi Yamada, Wataru Yonemichi, Ikuo Tooyama, Osamu Inatomi","doi":"10.1007/s11517-026-03670-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires reliable bile duct cannulation, yet steerability of wire-driven steerable catheters (SCs) can deteriorate when the shaft is constrained, partly because actuation may induce unintended shaft-side deformation and transmission loss. This study evaluated whether non-straight wire-routing architectures could improve practical steerability of a bidirectional SC for ERCP. Three prototypes were developed: a conventional straight-wiring design (SC#0), a non-straight, non-crossed design (SC#1), and a non-straight, crossed design (SC#2). Steerability was assessed by incremental wire-pulling tests under straight-shaft and loose-shaft conditions and by a mock ERCP study using an actual duodenoscope. Outcomes included the handle displacement and pulling force required to reach 85° distal bending (HD<sub>85</sub>, HPF<sub>85</sub>) and target-angle reachability. In the straight-shaft condition, SC#1 and SC#2 reduced HD<sub>85</sub> and HPF<sub>85</sub> by 54-63% and 63-65%, respectively, compared with SC#0. Under the loose-shaft condition, SC#0 reached 85° in only 1/5 trials, whereas SC#1 and SC#2 reached 85° in all trials. In the mock ERCP study, the proposed designs reduced HD<sub>85</sub> and HPF<sub>85</sub> by 57-71% and 57-62%, respectively, in both bending directions. These findings indicate that non-straight wire-routing architectures can be practically implemented in a bidirectional SC for ERCP and may improve steerability under ERCP-relevant constraints.</p>","PeriodicalId":49840,"journal":{"name":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-026-03670-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) requires reliable bile duct cannulation, yet steerability of wire-driven steerable catheters (SCs) can deteriorate when the shaft is constrained, partly because actuation may induce unintended shaft-side deformation and transmission loss. This study evaluated whether non-straight wire-routing architectures could improve practical steerability of a bidirectional SC for ERCP. Three prototypes were developed: a conventional straight-wiring design (SC#0), a non-straight, non-crossed design (SC#1), and a non-straight, crossed design (SC#2). Steerability was assessed by incremental wire-pulling tests under straight-shaft and loose-shaft conditions and by a mock ERCP study using an actual duodenoscope. Outcomes included the handle displacement and pulling force required to reach 85° distal bending (HD85, HPF85) and target-angle reachability. In the straight-shaft condition, SC#1 and SC#2 reduced HD85 and HPF85 by 54-63% and 63-65%, respectively, compared with SC#0. Under the loose-shaft condition, SC#0 reached 85° in only 1/5 trials, whereas SC#1 and SC#2 reached 85° in all trials. In the mock ERCP study, the proposed designs reduced HD85 and HPF85 by 57-71% and 57-62%, respectively, in both bending directions. These findings indicate that non-straight wire-routing architectures can be practically implemented in a bidirectional SC for ERCP and may improve steerability under ERCP-relevant constraints.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing (MBEC) continues to serve the biomedical engineering community, covering the entire spectrum of biomedical and clinical engineering. The journal presents exciting and vital experimental and theoretical developments in biomedical science and technology, and reports on advances in computer-based methodologies in these multidisciplinary subjects. The journal also incorporates new and evolving technologies including cellular engineering and molecular imaging.
MBEC publishes original research articles as well as reviews and technical notes. Its Rapid Communications category focuses on material of immediate value to the readership, while the Controversies section provides a forum to exchange views on selected issues, stimulating a vigorous and informed debate in this exciting and high profile field.
MBEC is an official journal of the International Federation of Medical and Biological Engineering (IFMBE).