Cancer Education Outcomes and Risk Perception Among 11th Grade Students in Japan: A Second National Survey.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Mahiro Fujita, Ryoko Rikitake, Risa Ikeda, Hiroko Yako-Suketomo, Takahiro Higashi, Takahiro Higashi
{"title":"Cancer Education Outcomes and Risk Perception Among 11th Grade Students in Japan: A Second National Survey.","authors":"Mahiro Fujita, Ryoko Rikitake, Risa Ikeda, Hiroko Yako-Suketomo, Takahiro Higashi, Takahiro Higashi","doi":"10.1007/s13187-026-02981-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Japan, the National Cancer Control Plan established cancer education as a foundational pillar; however, the effects of its implementation remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to describe cancer education outcomes and cancer perceptions among high school students in a nationwide survey. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 11th-grade students in Japan. In total, 13,089 participants completed a 36-item questionnaire on cancer prevention, screening, treatment, survivorship, and literacy. We then analyzed sex differences and independent factors associated with accurate cancer risk perception. Only 32.7% of students showed accurate cancer risk perception. Significant sex differences were observed across most categories. Notably, compared with the 2022 baseline survey, the proportion of students with accurate risk perception increased by approximately 2% points. Discussing cancer-related topics with family or friends was positively associated with accurate risk perception. Additionally, cancer knowledge, including treatment and prevention, improved with the full implementation of cancer education guidelines. However, the proportion of students with accurate risk perception remains suboptimal. Emphasizing the distinction between risks and attribution of disease occurrence warrants greater attention in cancer education.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-026-02981-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Japan, the National Cancer Control Plan established cancer education as a foundational pillar; however, the effects of its implementation remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to describe cancer education outcomes and cancer perceptions among high school students in a nationwide survey. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 11th-grade students in Japan. In total, 13,089 participants completed a 36-item questionnaire on cancer prevention, screening, treatment, survivorship, and literacy. We then analyzed sex differences and independent factors associated with accurate cancer risk perception. Only 32.7% of students showed accurate cancer risk perception. Significant sex differences were observed across most categories. Notably, compared with the 2022 baseline survey, the proportion of students with accurate risk perception increased by approximately 2% points. Discussing cancer-related topics with family or friends was positively associated with accurate risk perception. Additionally, cancer knowledge, including treatment and prevention, improved with the full implementation of cancer education guidelines. However, the proportion of students with accurate risk perception remains suboptimal. Emphasizing the distinction between risks and attribution of disease occurrence warrants greater attention in cancer education.

日本11年级学生癌症教育结果和风险认知:第二次全国调查。
在日本,国家癌症控制计划将癌症教育作为基础支柱;然而,其实施效果仍不明朗。因此,本研究旨在描述一项全国性调查中高中生的癌症教育结果和癌症观念。在日本的11年级学生中进行了一项横断面调查。总共有13089名参与者完成了一份36项关于癌症预防、筛查、治疗、幸存者和识字的调查问卷。然后,我们分析了与准确的癌症风险感知相关的性别差异和独立因素。只有32.7%的学生有准确的癌症风险认知。在大多数类别中都观察到显著的性别差异。值得注意的是,与2022年的基线调查相比,具有准确风险感知的学生比例增加了约2%。与家人或朋友讨论癌症相关话题与准确的风险认知呈正相关。此外,随着癌症教育指南的全面实施,包括治疗和预防在内的癌症知识也得到了提高。然而,具有准确风险感知的学生比例仍然不理想。强调疾病发生的风险和归因之间的区别值得在癌症教育中得到更多的关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书