{"title":"First-line Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Platinum-ineligible Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma.","authors":"G O Kaneko, Daisuke Igarashi, Suguru Shirotake","doi":"10.21873/cdp.10590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>Platinum-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma represent a clinically vulnerable population with limited treatment options and poor historical outcomes. Although first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has become a new standard treatment, evidence in platinum-ineligible patients remains limited. This study described the real-world clinical course of platinum-ineligible patients treated with first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab within a consecutive cohort.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 40 consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who initiated first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab between December 2024 and March 2026. Platinum eligibility was determined using prespecified creatinine clearance-based criteria. Tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and individual treatment courses were evaluated descriptively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 40 patients, eight were classified as platinum ineligible. Tumor response was evaluable in six platinum-ineligible patients, of whom one achieved complete response and three achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached in the platinum-ineligible subgroup. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were infrequent. The swimmer plot demonstrated heterogeneous clinical trajectories, including early discontinuation in some patients and prolonged treatment exposure or off-treatment disease control in others.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed encouraging clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in selected platinum-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Given the small subgroup size, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating.</p>","PeriodicalId":72510,"journal":{"name":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","volume":"6 5","pages":"890-899"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13531639/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer diagnosis & prognosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/cdp.10590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background/aim: Platinum-ineligible patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma represent a clinically vulnerable population with limited treatment options and poor historical outcomes. Although first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab has become a new standard treatment, evidence in platinum-ineligible patients remains limited. This study described the real-world clinical course of platinum-ineligible patients treated with first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab within a consecutive cohort.
Patients and methods: This retrospective single-center study included 40 consecutive patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma who initiated first-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab between December 2024 and March 2026. Platinum eligibility was determined using prespecified creatinine clearance-based criteria. Tumor response, progression-free survival, overall survival, treatment-related adverse events, and individual treatment courses were evaluated descriptively.
Results: Among 40 patients, eight were classified as platinum ineligible. Tumor response was evaluable in six platinum-ineligible patients, of whom one achieved complete response and three achieved partial response. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached in the platinum-ineligible subgroup. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were infrequent. The swimmer plot demonstrated heterogeneous clinical trajectories, including early discontinuation in some patients and prolonged treatment exposure or off-treatment disease control in others.
Conclusion: First-line enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab showed encouraging clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in selected platinum-ineligible patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma. Given the small subgroup size, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive and hypothesis-generating.