Uncovering scleromyositis: no myth, just missed.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Current opinion in rheumatology Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-07 DOI:10.1097/BOR.0000000000001187
Océane Landon-Cardinal, Margherita Giannini, Geneviève Gyger, Benjamin Ellezam
{"title":"Uncovering scleromyositis: no myth, just missed.","authors":"Océane Landon-Cardinal, Margherita Giannini, Geneviève Gyger, Benjamin Ellezam","doi":"10.1097/BOR.0000000000001187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Scleromyositis (SM), the muscle-specific manifestation of scleroderma, is increasingly recognized as a distinct myositis subset, yet it remains poorly captured by existing classification criteria and absent from therapeutic guidelines. This review provides recent advances in SM with emphasis on challenging presentations and propose a pragmatic diagnostic framework integrating clinical, serological, capillaroscopic, and histopathological data.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Recent studies identify capillaropathy as the unifying pathological hallmark of SM across muscle biopsy subtypes. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy reveals a predominantly scleroderma-active or scleroderma-like microangiopathy discriminating SM from potential myositis mimickers. Recent cohort studies demonstrate that SM confers independent mortality burden and substantial cardiac risk warranting immediate cardiac evaluation at diagnosis regardless of autoantibody profile or histological pattern. Pericyte dysfunction may link capillaropathy to fibrosis in SM, while autoantibodies appear to directly disrupt intracellular pathways, contributing to the shared vasculopathic and profibrotic signature that defines SM as a distinct entity.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>SM represents a clinically severe and underrecognized disease spectrum that frequently escapes current classification frameworks. Early SM diagnosis requires systematic integration of clinical, serological, capillaroscopic, and histopathological data, with capillaropathy as the unifying thread. Establishing a consensus SM definition and securing clinical trial inclusion remain the most urgent research priorities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11145,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":"470-480"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000001187","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Scleromyositis (SM), the muscle-specific manifestation of scleroderma, is increasingly recognized as a distinct myositis subset, yet it remains poorly captured by existing classification criteria and absent from therapeutic guidelines. This review provides recent advances in SM with emphasis on challenging presentations and propose a pragmatic diagnostic framework integrating clinical, serological, capillaroscopic, and histopathological data.

Recent findings: Recent studies identify capillaropathy as the unifying pathological hallmark of SM across muscle biopsy subtypes. Nailfold videocapillaroscopy reveals a predominantly scleroderma-active or scleroderma-like microangiopathy discriminating SM from potential myositis mimickers. Recent cohort studies demonstrate that SM confers independent mortality burden and substantial cardiac risk warranting immediate cardiac evaluation at diagnosis regardless of autoantibody profile or histological pattern. Pericyte dysfunction may link capillaropathy to fibrosis in SM, while autoantibodies appear to directly disrupt intracellular pathways, contributing to the shared vasculopathic and profibrotic signature that defines SM as a distinct entity.

Summary: SM represents a clinically severe and underrecognized disease spectrum that frequently escapes current classification frameworks. Early SM diagnosis requires systematic integration of clinical, serological, capillaroscopic, and histopathological data, with capillaropathy as the unifying thread. Establishing a consensus SM definition and securing clinical trial inclusion remain the most urgent research priorities.

揭露硬化肌炎:没有神话,只是错过了。
综述目的:硬化肌炎(SM)是硬皮病的肌肉特异性表现,越来越多地被认为是一个独特的肌炎亚群,但现有的分类标准仍然很少对其进行描述,治疗指南中也没有对其进行描述。本文综述了SM的最新进展,重点介绍了具有挑战性的报告,并提出了一个实用的诊断框架,整合了临床、血清学、毛细血管镜和组织病理学数据。最近的发现:最近的研究确定毛细血管病变是跨肌肉活检亚型SM的统一病理标志。甲襞视频毛细血管镜检查显示主要是硬皮病活动性或硬皮病样微血管病变,将SM与潜在的肌炎模仿者区分开来。最近的队列研究表明,SM具有独立的死亡负担和大量的心脏风险,需要在诊断时立即进行心脏评估,无论自身抗体谱或组织学模式如何。周细胞功能障碍可能将SM的毛细血管病变与纤维化联系起来,而自身抗体似乎直接破坏细胞内通路,有助于共享血管病变和纤维化特征,将SM定义为一个独特的实体。摘要:SM代表了一种临床上严重且未被充分认识的疾病谱系,经常逃脱当前的分类框架。SM的早期诊断需要以毛细血管病变为统一线索,系统整合临床、血清学、毛细血管镜和组织病理学资料。建立一致的SM定义和确保临床试验纳入仍然是最紧迫的研究重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current opinion in rheumatology
Current opinion in rheumatology 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.00%
发文量
89
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: A high impact review journal which boasts an international readership, Current Opinion in Rheumatology offers a broad-based perspective on the most recent and exciting developments within the field of rheumatology. Published bimonthly, each issue features insightful editorials and high quality invited reviews covering two or three key disciplines which include vasculitis syndromes, medical physiology and rheumatic diseases, crystal deposition diseases and rheumatoid arthritis. Each discipline introduces world renowned guest editors to ensure the journal is at the forefront of knowledge development and delivers balanced, expert assessments of advances from the previous year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书