Sustainable chemical technology: Core concepts, key subfields, and assessment approaches.

IF 7.2 Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
生物设计研究(英文) Pub Date : 2026-07-25 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.bidere.2026.100105
Máté Hartyányi, Roland Nagy
{"title":"Sustainable chemical technology: Core concepts, key subfields, and assessment approaches.","authors":"Máté Hartyányi, Roland Nagy","doi":"10.1016/j.bidere.2026.100105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sustainable Chemical Technology provides an integrative framework for designing and deploying chemical products and manufacturing routes that reduce life-cycle environmental burdens while maintaining technical performance and economic viability. While green chemistry principles guide safer and more efficient transformations at the molecular level, sustainability outcomes at scale are often dominated by process and system factors, including separations and solvent management, utilities and energy integration, operability, and supply-chain constraints. This Short Communication proposes a concise working definition and a four-level interpretation structure spanning material, process, system, and life-cycle perspectives to support consistent boundary setting and comparison across technologies. Building on this framing, we summarize a compact taxonomy of core subfields feedstock and resources, reaction and process design, solvents and separations, and circularity and waste and outline typical intervention levers and trade-offs within each. Finally, we recommend a minimal assessment bundle that combines fast screening metrics with life-cycle thinking to reduce burden shifting and enable transparent decision-making from early research to industrial adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":56832,"journal":{"name":"生物设计研究(英文)","volume":"8 3","pages":"100105"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13528355/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生物设计研究(英文)","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bidere.2026.100105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sustainable Chemical Technology provides an integrative framework for designing and deploying chemical products and manufacturing routes that reduce life-cycle environmental burdens while maintaining technical performance and economic viability. While green chemistry principles guide safer and more efficient transformations at the molecular level, sustainability outcomes at scale are often dominated by process and system factors, including separations and solvent management, utilities and energy integration, operability, and supply-chain constraints. This Short Communication proposes a concise working definition and a four-level interpretation structure spanning material, process, system, and life-cycle perspectives to support consistent boundary setting and comparison across technologies. Building on this framing, we summarize a compact taxonomy of core subfields feedstock and resources, reaction and process design, solvents and separations, and circularity and waste and outline typical intervention levers and trade-offs within each. Finally, we recommend a minimal assessment bundle that combines fast screening metrics with life-cycle thinking to reduce burden shifting and enable transparent decision-making from early research to industrial adoption.

可持续化工技术:核心概念、关键子领域和评估方法。
可持续化学技术为设计和部署化学产品和制造路线提供了一个综合框架,减少了生命周期的环境负担,同时保持了技术性能和经济可行性。虽然绿色化学原则在分子水平上指导更安全、更有效的转化,但大规模的可持续性结果通常由过程和系统因素主导,包括分离和溶剂管理、公用事业和能源整合、可操作性和供应链约束。这个简短的交流提出了一个简明的工作定义和一个跨越材料、过程、系统和生命周期视角的四级解释结构,以支持一致的边界设置和跨技术的比较。在此框架的基础上,我们总结了核心子领域的紧凑分类:原料和资源、反应和工艺设计、溶剂和分离、循环和浪费,并概述了每个子领域的典型干预杠杆和权衡。最后,我们推荐一个最小的评估包,将快速筛选指标与生命周期思维相结合,以减少负担转移,并使从早期研究到工业采用的决策透明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书