A Total Displacement Catastrophe Criterion for Assessing Open‐Pit Slope Stability Under Rainfall Conditions

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Lu He, Jianchuan Ren, Yuqi Shang, Gaofeng Song, Dezhong Kong, Di Wu
{"title":"A Total Displacement Catastrophe Criterion for Assessing Open‐Pit Slope Stability Under Rainfall Conditions","authors":"Lu He, Jianchuan Ren, Yuqi Shang, Gaofeng Song, Dezhong Kong, Di Wu","doi":"10.1002/nag.70430","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study is to address the challenge of accurately assessing the stability of open‐pit mine slopes under rainfall infiltration. This study innovatively combines total displacement theory with the cusp catastrophe model. A slope instability criterion based on total displacement mutation is proposed. The MATLAB platform was used for model validation and comparative analysis. Firstly, a quartic polynomial model was developed to characterize the relationship between the total displacement and the reduction coefficient based on the strength reduction method and total displacement theory. The equilibrium and discriminant equations for the cusp catastrophe model were then derived. Secondly, a typical mine slope in Guizhou Province, China, was selected as a case study to assess the applicability and accuracy of three instability criteria: the plastic zone penetration criterion, the key point displacement catastrophe criterion, and the total displacement catastrophe criterion (TDCC). The results indicate that the slope safety factor calculated by the TDCC is 1.201. This criterion is objective and independent of the monitoring point location, significantly reducing human errors. The criterion's accuracy was further verified by varying the cohesion and the internal friction angle. The results obtained from the TDCC were stable and central, aligning with the variation trends of the other two criteria, thereby confirming its reliability and accuracy. This work provides a quantitative, operational method for identifying instability in slope rainfall‐infiltration stability analysis. It is of theoretical and engineering guidance significance for the prevention and control of slope disasters in open‐pit mines.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70430","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to address the challenge of accurately assessing the stability of open‐pit mine slopes under rainfall infiltration. This study innovatively combines total displacement theory with the cusp catastrophe model. A slope instability criterion based on total displacement mutation is proposed. The MATLAB platform was used for model validation and comparative analysis. Firstly, a quartic polynomial model was developed to characterize the relationship between the total displacement and the reduction coefficient based on the strength reduction method and total displacement theory. The equilibrium and discriminant equations for the cusp catastrophe model were then derived. Secondly, a typical mine slope in Guizhou Province, China, was selected as a case study to assess the applicability and accuracy of three instability criteria: the plastic zone penetration criterion, the key point displacement catastrophe criterion, and the total displacement catastrophe criterion (TDCC). The results indicate that the slope safety factor calculated by the TDCC is 1.201. This criterion is objective and independent of the monitoring point location, significantly reducing human errors. The criterion's accuracy was further verified by varying the cohesion and the internal friction angle. The results obtained from the TDCC were stable and central, aligning with the variation trends of the other two criteria, thereby confirming its reliability and accuracy. This work provides a quantitative, operational method for identifying instability in slope rainfall‐infiltration stability analysis. It is of theoretical and engineering guidance significance for the prevention and control of slope disasters in open‐pit mines.
降雨条件下露天边坡稳定性评价的总位移突变准则
本研究的目的是解决在降雨入渗条件下准确评估露天矿边坡稳定性的挑战。本研究创新性地将总位移理论与尖突变模型相结合。提出了基于总位移突变的边坡失稳判据。利用MATLAB平台对模型进行验证和对比分析。首先,基于强度折减法和总位移理论,建立了总位移与折减系数关系的四次多项式模型;推导了尖突变模型的平衡方程和判别方程。其次,以贵州某典型矿山边坡为例,对塑性区穿透判据、关键点位移突变判据和总位移突变判据(TDCC)的适用性和准确性进行了评价。结果表明,TDCC计算的边坡安全系数为1.201。这一标准是客观的,独立于监测点的位置,大大减少了人为错误。通过改变黏聚力和内摩擦角进一步验证了准则的准确性。TDCC的结果稳定且集中,与其他两个指标的变化趋势一致,从而证实了其可靠性和准确性。这项工作为确定坡面降雨入渗稳定性分析中的不稳定性提供了一种定量的、可操作的方法。对露天矿边坡灾害的防治具有理论和工程指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书