Transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment in a continuously monitored surgical ward: Diagnostic performance of wearable-derived early warning scores.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
E E Jerry, M A Afonso, J C De Vries, A Akkermans, S Turco, A R Bouwman, S W Nienhuijs
{"title":"Transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment in a continuously monitored surgical ward: Diagnostic performance of wearable-derived early warning scores.","authors":"E E Jerry, M A Afonso, J C De Vries, A Akkermans, S Turco, A R Bouwman, S W Nienhuijs","doi":"10.1007/s10877-026-01488-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early detection of clinical deterioration on surgical wards is vital to prevent adverse outcomes. Conventional ward monitoring using the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) relies on intermittent nurse-measured vital signs, but its role may change when continuous wearable monitoring is already available. This study evaluated the transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment in a continuously monitored surgical ward and compared the diagnostic performance of two wearable-derived Early Warning Scores (EWS) with conventional MEWS. In this single-center cohort study conducted between October 2024 and June 2025, postoperative patients were continuously monitored using a wearable sensor measuring heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Continuous wearable monitoring was available throughout the entire study period. During Phase 1, nurse-measured MEWS assessments were mandatory according to local protocol. During Phase 2, nurse-measured MEWS assessments were performed at staff discretion. Two wearable-derived algorithms were evaluated: the Continuous Remote EWS (CREWS), based on a previously developed algorithm, and Remote 3 EWS (R3EWS), a modified version of the hospital's standard MEWS using three parameters. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for clinical deterioration, defined as postoperative complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ II. A total of 544 admissions (516 patients) were included, of which 98 admissions (18%) experienced clinical deterioration (comprising 154 clinical deterioration events). Following the transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment, intermittent nurse-measured vital signs were performed less frequently, while MEWS ≥ 3 occurred more often, resulting in higher MEWS sensitivity and lower specificity. In the separate diagnostic performance analysis, R3EWS showed slightly higher AUROC values (0.61) compared with MEWS (0.58) and CREWS (0.59), although differences were modest. Wearable-derived alarm frequency increased 6-8 h before clinical deterioration. In a surgical ward where continuous wearable monitoring was already available, transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment was associated with fewer intermittent observations, higher MEWS sensitivity, and lower specificity. Wearable-derived EWS algorithms showed comparable but modest discriminative performance relative to conventional MEWS. The increased number of alerts highlights the need for prospective validation and clear protocols for integrating continuous monitoring data into ward escalation workflows.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-026-01488-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early detection of clinical deterioration on surgical wards is vital to prevent adverse outcomes. Conventional ward monitoring using the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS) relies on intermittent nurse-measured vital signs, but its role may change when continuous wearable monitoring is already available. This study evaluated the transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment in a continuously monitored surgical ward and compared the diagnostic performance of two wearable-derived Early Warning Scores (EWS) with conventional MEWS. In this single-center cohort study conducted between October 2024 and June 2025, postoperative patients were continuously monitored using a wearable sensor measuring heart rate, respiratory rate, and oxygen saturation. Continuous wearable monitoring was available throughout the entire study period. During Phase 1, nurse-measured MEWS assessments were mandatory according to local protocol. During Phase 2, nurse-measured MEWS assessments were performed at staff discretion. Two wearable-derived algorithms were evaluated: the Continuous Remote EWS (CREWS), based on a previously developed algorithm, and Remote 3 EWS (R3EWS), a modified version of the hospital's standard MEWS using three parameters. The primary outcome was diagnostic accuracy for clinical deterioration, defined as postoperative complications graded Clavien-Dindo ≥ II. A total of 544 admissions (516 patients) were included, of which 98 admissions (18%) experienced clinical deterioration (comprising 154 clinical deterioration events). Following the transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment, intermittent nurse-measured vital signs were performed less frequently, while MEWS ≥ 3 occurred more often, resulting in higher MEWS sensitivity and lower specificity. In the separate diagnostic performance analysis, R3EWS showed slightly higher AUROC values (0.61) compared with MEWS (0.58) and CREWS (0.59), although differences were modest. Wearable-derived alarm frequency increased 6-8 h before clinical deterioration. In a surgical ward where continuous wearable monitoring was already available, transition from mandatory to discretionary nurse-measured MEWS assessment was associated with fewer intermittent observations, higher MEWS sensitivity, and lower specificity. Wearable-derived EWS algorithms showed comparable but modest discriminative performance relative to conventional MEWS. The increased number of alerts highlights the need for prospective validation and clear protocols for integrating continuous monitoring data into ward escalation workflows.

在持续监测的外科病房中,从强制性到自由裁量的护士测量MEWS评估的转变:可穿戴式早期预警评分的诊断性能。
早期发现外科病房的临床恶化对于预防不良后果至关重要。使用改进早期预警评分(MEWS)的传统病房监测依赖于间歇性护士测量的生命体征,但当连续可穿戴监测已经可用时,其作用可能会发生变化。本研究评估了在连续监测的外科病房中,从强制性到可自由选择的护士测量的MEWS评估的转变,并比较了两种可穿戴式早期预警评分(EWS)与传统MEWS的诊断性能。在这项于2024年10月至2025年6月进行的单中心队列研究中,术后患者使用可穿戴传感器连续监测心率、呼吸频率和血氧饱和度。在整个研究期间,可穿戴式连续监测。在第1阶段,根据当地协议,护士测量的MEWS评估是强制性的。在第2阶段,护士测量的MEWS评估由工作人员自行决定。评估了两种可穿戴衍生算法:基于先前开发的算法的连续远程EWS (CREWS)和远程3EWS (R3EWS),这是医院标准MEWS的修改版本,使用三个参数。主要结局是临床恶化的诊断准确性,定义为术后并发症分级Clavien-Dindo≥II。共纳入544例入院患者(516例患者),其中98例(18%)出现临床恶化(包括154例临床恶化事件)。从强制性的护士测量MEWS评估向自主的护士测量MEWS评估转变后,间歇性的护士测量生命体征的频率减少,而MEWS≥3的发生频率增加,导致MEWS敏感性提高,特异性降低。在单独的诊断性能分析中,R3EWS的AUROC值(0.61)略高于MEWS(0.58)和CREWS(0.59),尽管差异不大。在临床恶化前6-8小时,可穿戴设备的报警频率增加。在已经可以使用连续可穿戴监测的外科病房中,从强制性的MEWS评估过渡到由护士自行测量的MEWS评估与更少的间歇性观察、更高的MEWS敏感性和更低的特异性相关。与传统的MEWS相比,可穿戴衍生的EWS算法表现出相当但适度的判别性能。警报数量的增加凸显了对前瞻性验证和明确协议的需求,以便将持续监测数据集成到病房升级工作流程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书