Breathing-phase selection for gated proton therapy in lung cancer towards temporally targeted ultra-high dose rate delivery

IF 3.2 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Simone N. Visser, Krista C.J. van Doorn-Wink, Koen F. Crama, Coen R.N. Rasch, Steven J.M. Habraken
{"title":"Breathing-phase selection for gated proton therapy in lung cancer towards temporally targeted ultra-high dose rate delivery","authors":"Simone N. Visser,&nbsp;Krista C.J. van Doorn-Wink,&nbsp;Koen F. Crama,&nbsp;Coen R.N. Rasch,&nbsp;Steven J.M. Habraken","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2026.101065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and purpose</h3><div>Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation has been demonstrated to reduce normal tissue damage compared to conventional dose rates, while maintaining tumor response (FLASH-effect). UHDR could potentially freeze intra-fraction breathing motion, enabling margin reduction for moving tumors when accurately timed. Targeting the optimal breathing-phase could reduce organ-at-risk (OAR) dose and side effects. In this treatment planning study, the optimal phase(s) for UHDR proton therapy were identified and potential benefits were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Twenty lung cancer patients, previously treated with 66 GyE/24 or 60 GyE/30 fractions, were included. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans with clinical target and OAR delineations were used to create new treatment plans for individual 4D-CT phases, one-phase plans (OPP) and multiple-phase plans (MPP). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were evaluated.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Phase-targeted proton therapy (PTPT) significantly reduced OAR dose. The largest reductions were achieved with OPP, while MPP showed smaller reductions. With OPP, mean lung dose (mean: −0.7 GyE, range: −1.7 to 0.3 GyE), mean heart dose (mean: −0.4 GyE, range: −1.4 to 0.5 GyE), and mean esophagus dose (mean: −0.9 GyE, range: −6.0 to 0 GyE) were reduced, with most reductions in the 0%, 40%, and 70% phases, respectively. NTCP values indicated reduced complication probabilities across all phases, with additional gains for optimal phases.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>With PTPT, OAR dose may be reduced with potential clinical benefit across all phases. The optimal phase depended on the endpoint, suggesting patient-specific phase targeting could further improve outcomes. Future research should address phase targetability, residual variation and required robustness.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 101065"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S240563162600165X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose

Ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) irradiation has been demonstrated to reduce normal tissue damage compared to conventional dose rates, while maintaining tumor response (FLASH-effect). UHDR could potentially freeze intra-fraction breathing motion, enabling margin reduction for moving tumors when accurately timed. Targeting the optimal breathing-phase could reduce organ-at-risk (OAR) dose and side effects. In this treatment planning study, the optimal phase(s) for UHDR proton therapy were identified and potential benefits were evaluated.

Materials and methods

Twenty lung cancer patients, previously treated with 66 GyE/24 or 60 GyE/30 fractions, were included. Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) scans with clinical target and OAR delineations were used to create new treatment plans for individual 4D-CT phases, one-phase plans (OPP) and multiple-phase plans (MPP). Clinically relevant dose-volume parameters and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) were evaluated.

Results

Phase-targeted proton therapy (PTPT) significantly reduced OAR dose. The largest reductions were achieved with OPP, while MPP showed smaller reductions. With OPP, mean lung dose (mean: −0.7 GyE, range: −1.7 to 0.3 GyE), mean heart dose (mean: −0.4 GyE, range: −1.4 to 0.5 GyE), and mean esophagus dose (mean: −0.9 GyE, range: −6.0 to 0 GyE) were reduced, with most reductions in the 0%, 40%, and 70% phases, respectively. NTCP values indicated reduced complication probabilities across all phases, with additional gains for optimal phases.

Conclusions

With PTPT, OAR dose may be reduced with potential clinical benefit across all phases. The optimal phase depended on the endpoint, suggesting patient-specific phase targeting could further improve outcomes. Future research should address phase targetability, residual variation and required robustness.
肺癌门控质子治疗的呼吸期选择,以达到暂时靶向的超高剂量率给药
背景和目的与常规剂量率相比,超高剂量率(UHDR)辐照已被证明可以减少正常组织损伤,同时保持肿瘤反应(flash效应)。UHDR可能会冻结分数内呼吸运动,在精确计时的情况下,使移动的肿瘤缩小边缘。瞄准最佳呼吸期可以减少器官危险(OAR)剂量和副作用。在这项治疗计划研究中,确定了UHDR质子治疗的最佳阶段,并评估了潜在的益处。材料和方法纳入20例肺癌患者,既往接受66 GyE/24或60 GyE/30分数治疗。四维计算机断层扫描(4D-CT)与临床靶标和OAR描绘用于创建新的4D-CT单个阶段,一期计划(OPP)和多期计划(MPP)的治疗方案。评估临床相关的剂量-体积参数和正常组织并发症概率(NTCP)。结果期靶向质子治疗(PTPT)显著降低OAR剂量。OPP的降幅最大,而MPP的降幅较小。使用OPP,平均肺剂量(平均:−0.7 GyE,范围:−1.7至0.3 GyE)、平均心脏剂量(平均:−0.4 GyE,范围:−1.4至0.5 GyE)和平均食道剂量(平均:−0.9 GyE,范围:−6.0至0 GyE)降低,分别在0%、40%和70%阶段减少最多。NTCP值表明,所有阶段的复杂概率都降低了,最优阶段的复杂性增加了。结论PTPT可减少OAR剂量,并在所有阶段都有潜在的临床获益。最佳阶段取决于终点,这表明针对患者的阶段靶向可以进一步改善结果。未来的研究应解决相位可靶向性、剩余变异和所需的鲁棒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书