Coronary calcification masking an anomalous right coronary artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction

Saroj Kumar Sahoo, Ramachandra Barik, Debasis Acharya, Mohan Kumar, Debasis Panda, Prabhat Kumar Singh, Rubel Hossain, Melvin Baby, Muhiyyud Deen
{"title":"Coronary calcification masking an anomalous right coronary artery during primary percutaneous coronary intervention for inferior ST-elevation myocardial infarction","authors":"Saroj Kumar Sahoo,&nbsp;Ramachandra Barik,&nbsp;Debasis Acharya,&nbsp;Mohan Kumar,&nbsp;Debasis Panda,&nbsp;Prabhat Kumar Singh,&nbsp;Rubel Hossain,&nbsp;Melvin Baby,&nbsp;Muhiyyud Deen","doi":"10.1016/j.crmic.2026.100178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Anomalous aortic origin of the right coronary artery (RCA) is uncommon but can substantially complicate emergency angiography and PCI when conventional catheter strategies fail. Coronary calcification increases procedural complexity. Here, we report a case in which fluoroscopic calcification may have contributed to the diagnostic uncertainty during coronary cannulation. A 74-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented with acute chest pain and syncope. Following the syncopal episode, no recurrent loss of consciousness or overt hemodynamic instability was documented before catheterization. Electrocardiography revealed inferior STEMI, and echocardiography revealed inferior wall hypokinesia with a left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 40%. Angiography revealed significant disease in the left anterior descending and obtuse marginal artery. Repeated attempts to engage the RCA using multiple diagnostic and guiding catheters were unsuccessful until non-selective aortic root angiography identified the anomalous origin. Dense calcification adjacent to the expected RCA ostial region may have reinforced the initial impression of flush ostial occlusion and delayed the consideration of anomalous anatomy. During catheter manipulation, the inadvertent passage of a guidewire into an unidentified vessel provided the first clue to its anomalous origin. Non-selective aortic root angiography using a pigtail catheter identified a high-takeoff anomalous RCA, allowing for selective engagement with an Amplatz left-1 catheter. This case suggests that fluoroscopic calcification may reinforce an alternative diagnosis of ostial occlusion and delay the recognition of anomalous anatomy, highlighting a potential diagnostic challenge during primary PCI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100217,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Interesting Cases","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine: Interesting Cases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950275626000481","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is the preferred reperfusion strategy for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Anomalous aortic origin of the right coronary artery (RCA) is uncommon but can substantially complicate emergency angiography and PCI when conventional catheter strategies fail. Coronary calcification increases procedural complexity. Here, we report a case in which fluoroscopic calcification may have contributed to the diagnostic uncertainty during coronary cannulation. A 74-year-old man with diabetes mellitus and hypertension presented with acute chest pain and syncope. Following the syncopal episode, no recurrent loss of consciousness or overt hemodynamic instability was documented before catheterization. Electrocardiography revealed inferior STEMI, and echocardiography revealed inferior wall hypokinesia with a left ventricular ejection fraction of approximately 40%. Angiography revealed significant disease in the left anterior descending and obtuse marginal artery. Repeated attempts to engage the RCA using multiple diagnostic and guiding catheters were unsuccessful until non-selective aortic root angiography identified the anomalous origin. Dense calcification adjacent to the expected RCA ostial region may have reinforced the initial impression of flush ostial occlusion and delayed the consideration of anomalous anatomy. During catheter manipulation, the inadvertent passage of a guidewire into an unidentified vessel provided the first clue to its anomalous origin. Non-selective aortic root angiography using a pigtail catheter identified a high-takeoff anomalous RCA, allowing for selective engagement with an Amplatz left-1 catheter. This case suggests that fluoroscopic calcification may reinforce an alternative diagnosis of ostial occlusion and delay the recognition of anomalous anatomy, highlighting a potential diagnostic challenge during primary PCI.
经皮冠状动脉介入治疗下st段抬高型心肌梗死时冠状动脉钙化掩盖异常右冠状动脉
原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是st段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)的首选再灌注策略。右冠状动脉异常起源(RCA)并不常见,但当常规导管策略失败时,它会使急诊血管造影和PCI变得非常复杂。冠状动脉钙化增加了手术的复杂性。在这里,我们报告一个病例,其中透视钙化可能导致冠状动脉插管期间的诊断不确定性。74岁男性,糖尿病合并高血压,急性胸痛和晕厥。晕厥发作后,插管前无意识丧失复发或明显血流动力学不稳定记录。心电图显示下壁STEMI,超声心动图显示下壁运动功能减退,左室射血分数约为40%。血管造影显示左前降支及钝缘动脉明显病变。多次尝试使用多个诊断和引导导管进行RCA治疗均未成功,直到非选择性主动脉根部血管造影发现异常来源。邻近预期RCA口区致密钙化可能强化了冲口闭塞的最初印象,并推迟了对异常解剖的考虑。在导管操作过程中,导丝不慎进入不明血管,为其异常起源提供了第一个线索。非选择性主动脉根部血管造影使用细尾导管识别高起跳异常RCA,允许选择性地使用Amplatz左-1导管。本病例提示,透视钙化可能会加强对口闭塞的另一种诊断,并延迟对异常解剖结构的识别,突出了初级PCI的潜在诊断挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书