Manali Patel, Paul Gerardo Yeh, Thomas F Imperiale, Victoria L Champion, David R Lairson
{"title":"Barriers to Diagnostic Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Manali Patel, Paul Gerardo Yeh, Thomas F Imperiale, Victoria L Champion, David R Lairson","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-26-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (e.g., fecal immunochemical test [FIT], guaiac fecal occult blood test [gFOBT], multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA]) reduces CRC mortality only when a positive result is followed by timely diagnostic colonoscopy. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to completing diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based screening test. Guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language, peer-reviewed studies (October 2008- June 2025) reporting barriers, facilitators, or determinants of colonoscopy completion after a positive non-invasive stool-based CRC screening test (FIT, gFOBT, or mt-sDNA). Two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics and coded barriers/facilitators, which were categorized using a socioecological framework (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community/environmental, policy). 38 studies directly examined colonoscopy follow-up after a positive non-invasive test. Recurrent barriers included fear/anxiety and low perceived risk (intrapersonal), weak provider recommendation and support (interpersonal), referral and tracking failures and scheduling delays (organizational), transportation and distance (community/environmental), and cost-sharing/coverage gaps (policy). Evidence specifically assessing rural-urban differences was limited. Barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based CRC screening test are multi-level and potentially modifiable through improved communication, navigation, and closed-loop tracking. Multicomponent approaches that combine clear communication, navigation and reminder systems, transportation supports, and reduced financial barriers may improve diagnostic completion and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-26-0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (e.g., fecal immunochemical test [FIT], guaiac fecal occult blood test [gFOBT], multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA]) reduces CRC mortality only when a positive result is followed by timely diagnostic colonoscopy. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to completing diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based screening test. Guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language, peer-reviewed studies (October 2008- June 2025) reporting barriers, facilitators, or determinants of colonoscopy completion after a positive non-invasive stool-based CRC screening test (FIT, gFOBT, or mt-sDNA). Two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics and coded barriers/facilitators, which were categorized using a socioecological framework (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community/environmental, policy). 38 studies directly examined colonoscopy follow-up after a positive non-invasive test. Recurrent barriers included fear/anxiety and low perceived risk (intrapersonal), weak provider recommendation and support (interpersonal), referral and tracking failures and scheduling delays (organizational), transportation and distance (community/environmental), and cost-sharing/coverage gaps (policy). Evidence specifically assessing rural-urban differences was limited. Barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based CRC screening test are multi-level and potentially modifiable through improved communication, navigation, and closed-loop tracking. Multicomponent approaches that combine clear communication, navigation and reminder systems, transportation supports, and reduced financial barriers may improve diagnostic completion and equity.