Barriers to Diagnostic Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test: A Scoping Review.

IF 2.6
Manali Patel, Paul Gerardo Yeh, Thomas F Imperiale, Victoria L Champion, David R Lairson
{"title":"Barriers to Diagnostic Colonoscopy After a Positive Stool-Based Screening Test: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Manali Patel, Paul Gerardo Yeh, Thomas F Imperiale, Victoria L Champion, David R Lairson","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-26-0159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (e.g., fecal immunochemical test [FIT], guaiac fecal occult blood test [gFOBT], multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA]) reduces CRC mortality only when a positive result is followed by timely diagnostic colonoscopy. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to completing diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based screening test. Guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language, peer-reviewed studies (October 2008- June 2025) reporting barriers, facilitators, or determinants of colonoscopy completion after a positive non-invasive stool-based CRC screening test (FIT, gFOBT, or mt-sDNA). Two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics and coded barriers/facilitators, which were categorized using a socioecological framework (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community/environmental, policy). 38 studies directly examined colonoscopy follow-up after a positive non-invasive test. Recurrent barriers included fear/anxiety and low perceived risk (intrapersonal), weak provider recommendation and support (interpersonal), referral and tracking failures and scheduling delays (organizational), transportation and distance (community/environmental), and cost-sharing/coverage gaps (policy). Evidence specifically assessing rural-urban differences was limited. Barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based CRC screening test are multi-level and potentially modifiable through improved communication, navigation, and closed-loop tracking. Multicomponent approaches that combine clear communication, navigation and reminder systems, transportation supports, and reduced financial barriers may improve diagnostic completion and equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-26-0159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Non-invasive stool-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening (e.g., fecal immunochemical test [FIT], guaiac fecal occult blood test [gFOBT], multitarget stool DNA [mt-sDNA]) reduces CRC mortality only when a positive result is followed by timely diagnostic colonoscopy. We synthesized barriers and facilitators to completing diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based screening test. Guided by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR), we searched PubMed and MEDLINE (Ovid) for English-language, peer-reviewed studies (October 2008- June 2025) reporting barriers, facilitators, or determinants of colonoscopy completion after a positive non-invasive stool-based CRC screening test (FIT, gFOBT, or mt-sDNA). Two reviewers independently abstracted study characteristics and coded barriers/facilitators, which were categorized using a socioecological framework (intrapersonal, interpersonal, organizational, community/environmental, policy). 38 studies directly examined colonoscopy follow-up after a positive non-invasive test. Recurrent barriers included fear/anxiety and low perceived risk (intrapersonal), weak provider recommendation and support (interpersonal), referral and tracking failures and scheduling delays (organizational), transportation and distance (community/environmental), and cost-sharing/coverage gaps (policy). Evidence specifically assessing rural-urban differences was limited. Barriers to diagnostic colonoscopy after a positive stool-based CRC screening test are multi-level and potentially modifiable through improved communication, navigation, and closed-loop tracking. Multicomponent approaches that combine clear communication, navigation and reminder systems, transportation supports, and reduced financial barriers may improve diagnostic completion and equity.

基于粪便的筛查试验阳性后诊断结肠镜检查的障碍:范围审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书