Remote Monitoring and Self-Efficacy: Implications for Breast Cancer Survivorship Outcomes.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Ilana Graetz, Samuel Hernandez, Xin Hu, Rebecca A Krukowski, Gregory A Vidal, Lee S Schwartzberg
{"title":"Remote Monitoring and Self-Efficacy: Implications for Breast Cancer Survivorship Outcomes.","authors":"Ilana Graetz, Samuel Hernandez, Xin Hu, Rebecca A Krukowski, Gregory A Vidal, Lee S Schwartzberg","doi":"10.37765/ajmc.2026.89999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To examine whether self-efficacy in managing symptoms is associated with symptom burden and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among women with early-stage breast cancer and whether self-efficacy modifies the effects of a remote monitoring intervention.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Post hoc analysis of a randomized trial evaluating app-based remote monitoring of self-reported symptoms and adherence for women prescribed AET.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to enhanced usual care (EUC), app only (weekly remote monitoring), or app plus feedback (with weekly tailored supportive text messages). Outcomes included 12-month symptom burden (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Subscale [FACT-ES]) and adherence (≥ 80% of expected doses recorded using a connected pillbox). Multivariable regression evaluated associations of the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms T score with symptom burden and adherence as well as differential intervention effects by self-efficacy level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 264 participants (mean age, 58.5 years; 64% White, 32% Black), mean (SD) baseline self-efficacy exceeded the normative mean of 50 (54.2 [9.9]). Higher self-efficacy was associated with lower symptom burden (eg, higher FACT-ES score: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) and greater odds of adherence (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). Adherence benefits were greater at lower self-efficacy levels (eg, at a score of 30, 52.7% were adherent in app + feedback vs 17.8% in EUC; +34.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.0-68.9; P  = .04), with effects diminishing and becoming nonsignificant at higher self-efficacy levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Without additional support, breast cancer survivors with low self-efficacy had poorer symptom control and lower adherence. Remote symptom monitoring with tailored messaging was most effective among women with lower self-efficacy levels, highlighting the need for screening and targeted interventions for patients most likely to benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":50808,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Managed Care","volume":"32 8","pages":"437-443"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Managed Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37765/ajmc.2026.89999","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To examine whether self-efficacy in managing symptoms is associated with symptom burden and adjuvant endocrine therapy (AET) adherence among women with early-stage breast cancer and whether self-efficacy modifies the effects of a remote monitoring intervention.

Study design: Post hoc analysis of a randomized trial evaluating app-based remote monitoring of self-reported symptoms and adherence for women prescribed AET.

Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to enhanced usual care (EUC), app only (weekly remote monitoring), or app plus feedback (with weekly tailored supportive text messages). Outcomes included 12-month symptom burden (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Endocrine Subscale [FACT-ES]) and adherence (≥ 80% of expected doses recorded using a connected pillbox). Multivariable regression evaluated associations of the PROMIS (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) Self-Efficacy for Managing Symptoms T score with symptom burden and adherence as well as differential intervention effects by self-efficacy level.

Results: Among 264 participants (mean age, 58.5 years; 64% White, 32% Black), mean (SD) baseline self-efficacy exceeded the normative mean of 50 (54.2 [9.9]). Higher self-efficacy was associated with lower symptom burden (eg, higher FACT-ES score: 0.6; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8) and greater odds of adherence (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1). Adherence benefits were greater at lower self-efficacy levels (eg, at a score of 30, 52.7% were adherent in app + feedback vs 17.8% in EUC; +34.9 percentage points; 95% CI, 1.0-68.9; P  = .04), with effects diminishing and becoming nonsignificant at higher self-efficacy levels.

Conclusions: Without additional support, breast cancer survivors with low self-efficacy had poorer symptom control and lower adherence. Remote symptom monitoring with tailored messaging was most effective among women with lower self-efficacy levels, highlighting the need for screening and targeted interventions for patients most likely to benefit.

远程监测和自我效能:对乳腺癌生存结果的影响。
目的:研究早期乳腺癌患者症状管理的自我效能感是否与症状负担和辅助内分泌治疗(AET)依从性相关,以及自我效能感是否会改变远程监测干预的效果。研究设计:一项随机试验的事后分析,评估基于应用程序的远程监测自我报告的症状和服用AET的妇女的依从性。方法:参与者被随机分配到强化常规护理(EUC),仅应用程序(每周远程监测),或应用程序加反馈(每周定制支持性短信)。结果包括12个月的症状负担(癌症治疗功能评估-内分泌亚量表[FACT-ES])和依从性(≥80%的预期剂量,使用连接的药盒记录)。多变量回归评估了PROMIS(患者报告的结果测量信息系统)管理症状的自我效能T评分与症状负担和依从性的关系,以及自我效能水平的差异干预效果。结果:264名参与者(平均年龄58.5岁,白人64%,黑人32%),平均(SD)基线自我效能超过50的标准平均值(54.2[9.9])。较高的自我效能与较低的症状负担(例如,较高的FACT-ES评分:0.6;95% CI, 0.3-0.8)和较高的依从性(OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1)相关。在较低的自我效能水平下,依从性获益更大(例如,在得分为30时,52.7%的人在app +反馈中坚持,而在EUC中为17.8%;+34.9个百分点;95% CI, 1.0-68.9; P =。04),在更高的自我效能水平上,效果逐渐减弱,变得不显著。结论:在没有额外支持的情况下,自我效能低的乳腺癌幸存者症状控制较差,依从性较低。远程症状监测与量身定制的信息在自我效能水平较低的妇女中最有效,强调需要对最有可能受益的患者进行筛查和有针对性的干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Managed Care
American Journal of Managed Care 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Managed Care is an independent, peer-reviewed publication dedicated to disseminating clinical information to managed care physicians, clinical decision makers, and other healthcare professionals. Its aim is to stimulate scientific communication in the ever-evolving field of managed care. The American Journal of Managed Care addresses a broad range of issues relevant to clinical decision making in a cost-constrained environment and examines the impact of clinical, management, and policy interventions and programs on healthcare and economic outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书