Long-term incidence of infective endocarditis according to the type of cardiac implantable electronic device: a nationwide comparison with moderate- and high-risk patient groups.
Amna Alhakak, Lauge Østergaard, Mohammed Bakir Ahmad Lafta, Michael Vinther, Berit Thornvig Philbert, Henning Bundgaard, Lars Køber, Emil Loldrup Fosbøl
{"title":"Long-term incidence of infective endocarditis according to the type of cardiac implantable electronic device: a nationwide comparison with moderate- and high-risk patient groups.","authors":"Amna Alhakak, Lauge Østergaard, Mohammed Bakir Ahmad Lafta, Michael Vinther, Berit Thornvig Philbert, Henning Bundgaard, Lars Køber, Emil Loldrup Fosbøl","doi":"10.1093/europace/euag232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>According to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) are considered at moderate risk of infective endocarditis (IE), irrespective of CIED type. However, comparative data across CIED types and IE risk groups are limited. We examined IE rates according to CIED type compared with moderate- and high-risk groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Danish nationwide registries were used to identify patients with first-time CIED implantation and reference populations at moderate and high risk of IE (2000-2022), based on the ESC guidelines. The high-risk group included patients with a left-sided prosthetic valve. Patients with prior IE or left-sided prosthetic valve were excluded from the CIED group. The primary outcome was incident IE within 10 years. The study included 84 171 CIED recipients, 127 966 moderate-risk patients, and 23 505 high-risk patients. Pacemakers were the most common CIED type (74.9%), followed by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (16.6%), cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator (CRT-D) (4.6%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy device without defibrillator (3.9%). Pacemaker recipients were the oldest (median 78.2 years) and most frail. The 10-year cumulative incidence of IE was lowest in pacemaker recipients (1.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-1.1]) and highest in CRT-D recipients (2.2% [95% CI: 1.7-2.9]). In adjusted analyses, all CIED types were associated with higher IE rates than the moderate-risk group but lower than the high-risk group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this nationwide cohort, IE risk differed across CIED types, highest in CRT-D and lowest in pacemaker recipients. All CIED types were associated with higher risk than moderate-risk patients but lower risk than high-risk patients, supporting the ESC classification. Cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator recipients may warrant further evaluation of preventive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13659775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euag232","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: According to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines, patients with a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) are considered at moderate risk of infective endocarditis (IE), irrespective of CIED type. However, comparative data across CIED types and IE risk groups are limited. We examined IE rates according to CIED type compared with moderate- and high-risk groups.
Methods and results: Danish nationwide registries were used to identify patients with first-time CIED implantation and reference populations at moderate and high risk of IE (2000-2022), based on the ESC guidelines. The high-risk group included patients with a left-sided prosthetic valve. Patients with prior IE or left-sided prosthetic valve were excluded from the CIED group. The primary outcome was incident IE within 10 years. The study included 84 171 CIED recipients, 127 966 moderate-risk patients, and 23 505 high-risk patients. Pacemakers were the most common CIED type (74.9%), followed by implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (16.6%), cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator (CRT-D) (4.6%), and cardiac resynchronization therapy device without defibrillator (3.9%). Pacemaker recipients were the oldest (median 78.2 years) and most frail. The 10-year cumulative incidence of IE was lowest in pacemaker recipients (1.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.9-1.1]) and highest in CRT-D recipients (2.2% [95% CI: 1.7-2.9]). In adjusted analyses, all CIED types were associated with higher IE rates than the moderate-risk group but lower than the high-risk group.
Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort, IE risk differed across CIED types, highest in CRT-D and lowest in pacemaker recipients. All CIED types were associated with higher risk than moderate-risk patients but lower risk than high-risk patients, supporting the ESC classification. Cardiac resynchronization therapy device with defibrillator recipients may warrant further evaluation of preventive strategies.
期刊介绍:
EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.