{"title":"Probabilistic Evaluation of Heterogeneous Landslide Influence Zones Accounting for Stratigraphic Dips With Borehole Data","authors":"Jian‐Ping Li, Shui‐Hua Jiang, Jian‐Hong Wan, Guo‐Tao Ma, Mohammad Rezania, Jingjing Meng","doi":"10.1002/nag.70422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accurate prediction of landslide runout and hazard zones is crucial for effective disaster risk management. Current studies often overlook complex soil structures by using stationary isotropic or transversely anisotropic unconditional random fields (RFs) in landslide post‐failure modeling. Limited attention has been given to using borehole data for enhancing the accuracy of post‐failure behavior predictions in slopes. To address these issues, this study presents a novel framework to evaluate landslide hazard zones using conditional RFs. It integrates enhanced Bayesian Updating with Structural Reliability Methods (BUS) to infer soil parameter distributions, identify dips and capture soil nonstationarity. The process of landslide is simulated using the generalized interpolation material point (GIMP) method. Additionally, an automated strategy is proposed for the borehole location selection to ensure that predictions align with actual conditions. Results indicate that this method improves prediction accuracy for runout and influence distances by using borehole data and reduces uncertainty compared to unconditional RFs, thereby simplifying decision‐making and lowering control costs. Moreover, fewer boreholes are required for predicting runout distances compared to influence distances. This study highlights the necessity of considering complex heterogeneity and integration of borehole data in landslide risk management.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70422","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate prediction of landslide runout and hazard zones is crucial for effective disaster risk management. Current studies often overlook complex soil structures by using stationary isotropic or transversely anisotropic unconditional random fields (RFs) in landslide post‐failure modeling. Limited attention has been given to using borehole data for enhancing the accuracy of post‐failure behavior predictions in slopes. To address these issues, this study presents a novel framework to evaluate landslide hazard zones using conditional RFs. It integrates enhanced Bayesian Updating with Structural Reliability Methods (BUS) to infer soil parameter distributions, identify dips and capture soil nonstationarity. The process of landslide is simulated using the generalized interpolation material point (GIMP) method. Additionally, an automated strategy is proposed for the borehole location selection to ensure that predictions align with actual conditions. Results indicate that this method improves prediction accuracy for runout and influence distances by using borehole data and reduces uncertainty compared to unconditional RFs, thereby simplifying decision‐making and lowering control costs. Moreover, fewer boreholes are required for predicting runout distances compared to influence distances. This study highlights the necessity of considering complex heterogeneity and integration of borehole data in landslide risk management.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.