Salivary biomarkers as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Erick Nelo Pedreira, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Rommel Mario Rodriguez Burbano
{"title":"Salivary biomarkers as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Erick Nelo Pedreira, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Rommel Mario Rodriguez Burbano","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2725657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an average survival of just 12 months. Its aggressive nature and nonspecific symptoms often lead to late-stage diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods rely heavily on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which is invasive and costly. Saliva-based biomarkers have emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for GC diagnosis, although their clinical applicability remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies evaluating saliva-based diagnostics for GC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using RStudio version 4.2.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 1,119 patients (760 with GC) were included. In the GC group 63.8% were male and biomarkers vary between studies. The pooled sensitivity was 86.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 82%), and specificity was 85.5% (95% CI: 0.79-0.91; I<sup>2</sup> = 19%). The summary ROC curve had an AUC of 87.6%, with a normalized partial AUC of 67.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salivary biomarkers show strong potential for noninvasive GC early detection. Which represents a significant opportunity to change the natural history of gastric cancer. However, due to significant variability in biomarkers utilized, more homogenous studies are needed to better address the question.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2725657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an average survival of just 12 months. Its aggressive nature and nonspecific symptoms often lead to late-stage diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods rely heavily on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which is invasive and costly. Saliva-based biomarkers have emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for GC diagnosis, although their clinical applicability remains uncertain.

Research design and methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies evaluating saliva-based diagnostics for GC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using RStudio version 4.2.3.

Results: Eleven studies involving 1,119 patients (760 with GC) were included. In the GC group 63.8% were male and biomarkers vary between studies. The pooled sensitivity was 86.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.93; I2 = 82%), and specificity was 85.5% (95% CI: 0.79-0.91; I2 = 19%). The summary ROC curve had an AUC of 87.6%, with a normalized partial AUC of 67.2%.

Conclusion: Salivary biomarkers show strong potential for noninvasive GC early detection. Which represents a significant opportunity to change the natural history of gastric cancer. However, due to significant variability in biomarkers utilized, more homogenous studies are needed to better address the question.

唾液生物标志物作为胃癌非侵入性诊断工具:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:胃癌(GC)仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因,平均生存期仅为12个月。其侵袭性和非特异性症状往往导致晚期诊断。目前的诊断方法严重依赖于食管胃十二指肠镜检查,这是侵入性的和昂贵的。基于唾液的生物标志物已成为一种有前途的无创胃癌诊断方法,尽管其临床适用性仍不确定。研究设计和方法:我们在PubMed, Scopus和Web of Science中进行了系统搜索,以确定评估基于唾液的GC诊断的研究。使用RStudio 4.2.3版本以95%置信区间计算合并敏感性和特异性。结果:纳入了11项研究,涉及1,119例患者(760例GC)。在GC组中,63.8%为男性,不同研究的生物标志物有所不同。合并敏感性为86.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.93; I2 = 82%),特异性为85.5% (95% CI: 0.79-0.91; I2 = 19%)。总结ROC曲线的AUC为87.6%,标准化部分AUC为67.2%。结论:唾液生物标志物在无创胃癌早期检测中具有很强的潜力。这是改变胃癌自然历史的重要机会。然而,由于所使用的生物标志物具有显著的可变性,需要更多的同质研究来更好地解决这个问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting. Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy. Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书