Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Erick Nelo Pedreira, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Rommel Mario Rodriguez Burbano
{"title":"Salivary biomarkers as a non-invasive diagnostic tool for gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Francisco Cezar Aquino de Moraes, Gustavo Tadeu Freitas Uchôa Matheus, Luis Henrique Rios Moreira Rego, Erick Nelo Pedreira, Elizabeth Suchi Chen, Rommel Mario Rodriguez Burbano","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2026.2725657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an average survival of just 12 months. Its aggressive nature and nonspecific symptoms often lead to late-stage diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods rely heavily on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which is invasive and costly. Saliva-based biomarkers have emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for GC diagnosis, although their clinical applicability remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies evaluating saliva-based diagnostics for GC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using RStudio version 4.2.3.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven studies involving 1,119 patients (760 with GC) were included. In the GC group 63.8% were male and biomarkers vary between studies. The pooled sensitivity was 86.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.93; I<sup>2</sup> = 82%), and specificity was 85.5% (95% CI: 0.79-0.91; I<sup>2</sup> = 19%). The summary ROC curve had an AUC of 87.6%, with a normalized partial AUC of 67.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Salivary biomarkers show strong potential for noninvasive GC early detection. Which represents a significant opportunity to change the natural history of gastric cancer. However, due to significant variability in biomarkers utilized, more homogenous studies are needed to better address the question.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2026.2725657","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Gastric cancer (GC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with an average survival of just 12 months. Its aggressive nature and nonspecific symptoms often lead to late-stage diagnosis. Current diagnostic methods rely heavily on esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which is invasive and costly. Saliva-based biomarkers have emerged as a promising noninvasive approach for GC diagnosis, although their clinical applicability remains uncertain.
Research design and methods: We performed a systematic search in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies evaluating saliva-based diagnostics for GC. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated with 95% confidence intervals using RStudio version 4.2.3.
Results: Eleven studies involving 1,119 patients (760 with GC) were included. In the GC group 63.8% were male and biomarkers vary between studies. The pooled sensitivity was 86.3% (95% CI: 0.76-0.93; I2 = 82%), and specificity was 85.5% (95% CI: 0.79-0.91; I2 = 19%). The summary ROC curve had an AUC of 87.6%, with a normalized partial AUC of 67.2%.
Conclusion: Salivary biomarkers show strong potential for noninvasive GC early detection. Which represents a significant opportunity to change the natural history of gastric cancer. However, due to significant variability in biomarkers utilized, more homogenous studies are needed to better address the question.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.