Optical Astrometry and Radar Ranging in Earth–Moon Tracking Geometry for Cislunar Orbit Determination of Non-Cooperative Targets

IF 0.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Harold Ulotu, Runsong Lu, Zhenqi Wang, Wutong Gao, Jianguo Yan, Jean-Pierre Barriot
{"title":"Optical Astrometry and Radar Ranging in Earth–Moon Tracking Geometry for Cislunar Orbit Determination of Non-Cooperative Targets","authors":"Harold Ulotu,&nbsp;Runsong Lu,&nbsp;Zhenqi Wang,&nbsp;Wutong Gao,&nbsp;Jianguo Yan,&nbsp;Jean-Pierre Barriot","doi":"10.1134/S0038094626600563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Precise orbit determination of non-cooperative cislunar objects requires measurements that do not depend on onboard transponders or retroreflectors. This study evaluates whether optical astrometry and radar echo range can provide useful tracking performance in a two-station Earth–Moon geometry. Three configurations were tested with weighted batch least-squares estimation in the SPOT orbit-determination toolkit. Configuration A used Earth optical astrometry and Earth radar range. Configuration B added lunar optical astrometry, and Configuration C added lunar radar range. The targets were an Earth–Moon L4 case, a low circular lunar orbit, a highly elliptical lunar orbit, and an Apophis close-approach reference arc. The Earth-only baseline converged for all targets, but the benefit of a lunar station depended strongly on target distance and geometry. Lunar optical was most effective for the two lunar orbiters. Lunar radar range was most effective for distant geometries. The preferred lunar-station observable is therefore not universal. It depends on station–target distance, target dynamics, and parameter correlation.</p>","PeriodicalId":778,"journal":{"name":"Solar System Research","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar System Research","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0038094626600563","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precise orbit determination of non-cooperative cislunar objects requires measurements that do not depend on onboard transponders or retroreflectors. This study evaluates whether optical astrometry and radar echo range can provide useful tracking performance in a two-station Earth–Moon geometry. Three configurations were tested with weighted batch least-squares estimation in the SPOT orbit-determination toolkit. Configuration A used Earth optical astrometry and Earth radar range. Configuration B added lunar optical astrometry, and Configuration C added lunar radar range. The targets were an Earth–Moon L4 case, a low circular lunar orbit, a highly elliptical lunar orbit, and an Apophis close-approach reference arc. The Earth-only baseline converged for all targets, but the benefit of a lunar station depended strongly on target distance and geometry. Lunar optical was most effective for the two lunar orbiters. Lunar radar range was most effective for distant geometries. The preferred lunar-station observable is therefore not universal. It depends on station–target distance, target dynamics, and parameter correlation.

地月跟踪几何中的光学天文测量和雷达测距,用于非合作目标的地月轨道确定
非合作的地月物体的精确轨道确定需要不依赖于机载应答器或反射器的测量。本研究评估了光学天文测量和雷达回波距离是否可以在地月两站几何结构中提供有用的跟踪性能。利用加权批最小二乘估计在SPOT定轨工具中对三种构型进行了测试。一种用于地球光学天文测量和地球雷达测距。配置B增加了月球光学天文测量,配置C增加了月球雷达距离。目标是地月L4,低圆月球轨道,高椭圆月球轨道和阿波菲斯近距离参考弧。地球上所有目标的基线都汇聚在一起,但月球站的好处很大程度上取决于目标的距离和几何形状。月球光学是最有效的两个月球轨道器。月球雷达的探测范围对遥远的几何图形最为有效。因此,首选的可观测月球站并不是通用的。它取决于站靶距离、目标动力学和参数相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Solar System Research
Solar System Research 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
32
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Solar System Research publishes articles concerning the bodies of the Solar System, i.e., planets and their satellites, asteroids, comets, meteoric substances, and cosmic dust. The articles consider physics, dynamics and composition of these bodies, and techniques of their exploration. The journal addresses the problems of comparative planetology, physics of the planetary atmospheres and interiors, cosmochemistry, as well as planetary plasma environment and heliosphere, specifically those related to solar-planetary interactions. Attention is paid to studies of exoplanets and complex problems of the origin and evolution of planetary systems including the solar system, based on the results of astronomical observations, laboratory studies of meteorites, relevant theoretical approaches and mathematical modeling. Alongside with the original results of experimental and theoretical studies, the journal publishes scientific reviews in the field of planetary exploration, and notes on observational results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书