Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: MAIA final survival analysis.

IF 8.8 1区 医学 Q1 HEMATOLOGY
Thierry Facon, Shaji K Kumar, Robert Z Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Philippe Moreau, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Sonja Zweegman, Katja Weisel, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Noopur Raje, Salomon Manier, Ajai Chari, Markus Hansson, Mohamad Mohty, Michel Delforge, Torben Plesner, Gordon Cook, Xavier Leleu, Hang Quach, Christopher P Venner, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Kasey Bolyard, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Saad Z Usmani
{"title":"Daratumumab, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: MAIA final survival analysis.","authors":"Thierry Facon, Shaji K Kumar, Robert Z Orlowski, Nizar Bahlis, Philippe Moreau, Hartmut Goldschmidt, Supratik Basu, Cyrille Hulin, Sonja Zweegman, Katja Weisel, Aurore Perrot, Caroline Jacquet, Noopur Raje, Salomon Manier, Ajai Chari, Markus Hansson, Mohamad Mohty, Michel Delforge, Torben Plesner, Gordon Cook, Xavier Leleu, Hang Quach, Christopher P Venner, Mourad Tiab, Margaret Macro, Laurent Frenzel, George Wang, Huiling Pei, Kasey Bolyard, Robin Carson, Fredrik Borgsten, Saad Z Usmani","doi":"10.1038/s41375-026-03097-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In previous analyses of MAIA, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report results on long-term OS and subsequent antimyeloma therapies from the MAIA final analysis. A protocol amendment (July 20, 2021) led to a long-term extension of MAIA, during which patients were followed for OS. A total of 737 patients were randomized to D-Rd (n = 368) or Rd (n = 369). At a median follow-up of 89.3 months (range, 0.0-102.2; interquartile range, 85.3-93.0), median OS was 90.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8-not estimable [NE]) with D-Rd versus 64.1 months (56.0-70.8) with Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82); estimated 7-year OS rates were 53.1% (95% CI, 47.8-58.2) and 39.3% (34.1-44.5), respectively. Median time to subsequent antimyeloma treatment was not reached (95% CI, 84.1-NE) for D-Rd versus 42.4 months (33.5-50.6) for Rd (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.63; P < 0.0001). Death due to adverse events occurred in 84 patients (D-Rd, n = 44/364 [12%]; Rd, n = 40/365 [11%]). With >7 years of follow-up, D-Rd demonstrated a new benchmark for median OS (7.5 years) in transplant-ineligible NDMM, further supporting frontline D-Rd use to maximize survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":18109,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-026-03097-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In previous analyses of MAIA, daratumumab plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (D-Rd) significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) versus lenalidomide/dexamethasone (Rd) in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). We report results on long-term OS and subsequent antimyeloma therapies from the MAIA final analysis. A protocol amendment (July 20, 2021) led to a long-term extension of MAIA, during which patients were followed for OS. A total of 737 patients were randomized to D-Rd (n = 368) or Rd (n = 369). At a median follow-up of 89.3 months (range, 0.0-102.2; interquartile range, 85.3-93.0), median OS was 90.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.8-not estimable [NE]) with D-Rd versus 64.1 months (56.0-70.8) with Rd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82); estimated 7-year OS rates were 53.1% (95% CI, 47.8-58.2) and 39.3% (34.1-44.5), respectively. Median time to subsequent antimyeloma treatment was not reached (95% CI, 84.1-NE) for D-Rd versus 42.4 months (33.5-50.6) for Rd (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.63; P < 0.0001). Death due to adverse events occurred in 84 patients (D-Rd, n = 44/364 [12%]; Rd, n = 40/365 [11%]). With >7 years of follow-up, D-Rd demonstrated a new benchmark for median OS (7.5 years) in transplant-ineligible NDMM, further supporting frontline D-Rd use to maximize survival.

Abstract Image

达拉单抗、来那度胺和地塞米松治疗不适合移植的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤:MAIA最终生存分析
在之前的MAIA分析中,达拉单抗联合来那度胺/地塞米松(D-Rd)治疗移植不符合条件的新诊断多发性骨髓瘤(NDMM)的无进展生存期和总生存期(OS)明显优于来那度胺/地塞米松(Rd)。我们报告MAIA最终分析的长期OS和随后的抗骨髓瘤治疗结果。方案修订(2021年7月20日)导致MAIA的长期延长,在此期间对患者进行OS随访。共有737名患者被随机分配到D-Rd组(n = 368)或Rd组(n = 369)。在中位随访89.3个月(范围为0.0-102.2;四分位数间范围为85.3-93.0)时,D-Rd组的中位OS为90.3个月(95%可信区间[CI], 80.8-不可估计[NE]),而Rd组的中位OS为64.1个月(56.0-70.8)(风险比[HR], 0.67; 95% CI, 0.55-0.82);估计7年OS率分别为53.1% (95% CI, 47.8-58.2)和39.3%(34.1-44.5)。D-Rd未达到抗骨髓瘤治疗的中位时间(95% CI, 84.1-NE),而Rd为42.4个月(33.5-50.6)(HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41-0.63; P),随访7年,D-Rd显示了移植不合格NDMM中位OS(7.5年)的新基准,进一步支持一线使用D-Rd以最大限度地提高生存率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Leukemia
Leukemia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
18.10
自引率
3.50%
发文量
270
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Title: Leukemia Journal Overview: Publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research Covers all aspects of research and treatment of leukemia and allied diseases Includes studies of normal hemopoiesis due to comparative relevance Topics of Interest: Oncogenes Growth factors Stem cells Leukemia genomics Cell cycle Signal transduction Molecular targets for therapy And more Content Types: Original research articles Reviews Letters Correspondence Comments elaborating on significant advances and covering topical issues
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书