Clevidipine for Nicardipine Resistant Hypertension in Neurocritically Ill Patients.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
J Tyler Haller, Christian Eslinger, Nicholas Nelson, Anusha Mangalampalli, Aditya Kumar, Chia-Ling Phuah, Lindsey Stubbs, Abigail Tittle, Sarah Sternbach, Diane McLaughlin
{"title":"Clevidipine for Nicardipine Resistant Hypertension in Neurocritically Ill Patients.","authors":"J Tyler Haller, Christian Eslinger, Nicholas Nelson, Anusha Mangalampalli, Aditya Kumar, Chia-Ling Phuah, Lindsey Stubbs, Abigail Tittle, Sarah Sternbach, Diane McLaughlin","doi":"10.1177/08971900261483494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Acute hypertension is common in acute brain injuries and contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. The optimal agent to manage acute hypertension is unclear, though most critically ill patients in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit (Neuro ICU) are managed with nicardipine as a first line agent. If hypertension is inadequately controlled despite the maximal dose of nicardipine, few other agents exist that are both safe and efficacious. Clevidipine may be an optimal agent for nicardipine refractory hypertension. This retrospective cohort study included acute brain injured patients that were unable to achieve blood pressure goals despite maximal doses of nicardipine and were switched to clevidipine. The primary outcome was to evaluate the percentage of patients that achieved systolic blood pressure goals within 1 hour of clevidipine initiation. Secondary outcomes included hypotension, need for vasopressors, and development of tachycardia. Additional outcomes included duration of antihypertensive infusions and administration of as-needed hypertension medications. Out of 410 screened patients, 66 were included (median age 53.7 years, 43.9% female). Patients were at maximum nicardipine dose (15 mg/hr) when clevidipine was initiated in 91% of cases. Among those included, 77.3% of patients were unable to achieve goal blood pressure while on nicardipine therapy. Goal blood pressure was able to be achieved within 1 hour in 84.8% of patients receiving clevidipine. Adverse effects were minimal, with only 4 (6%) patients experiencing hypotension and 4 (6%) patients developing tachycardia within 12hrs of clevidipine initiation. The median duration of clevidipine infusion was 23.9 hours. Clevidipine appears to be an effective, safe alternative agent in patients that are unable to achieve blood pressure goals with nicardipine infusion. Future prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term neurological outcomes. Clinicians managing nicardipine-refractory hypertension in neurocritically ill patients may consider clevidipine as a structured second-line option pending such evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"8971900261483494"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900261483494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute hypertension is common in acute brain injuries and contributes to increased morbidity and mortality. The optimal agent to manage acute hypertension is unclear, though most critically ill patients in the Neuro Intensive Care Unit (Neuro ICU) are managed with nicardipine as a first line agent. If hypertension is inadequately controlled despite the maximal dose of nicardipine, few other agents exist that are both safe and efficacious. Clevidipine may be an optimal agent for nicardipine refractory hypertension. This retrospective cohort study included acute brain injured patients that were unable to achieve blood pressure goals despite maximal doses of nicardipine and were switched to clevidipine. The primary outcome was to evaluate the percentage of patients that achieved systolic blood pressure goals within 1 hour of clevidipine initiation. Secondary outcomes included hypotension, need for vasopressors, and development of tachycardia. Additional outcomes included duration of antihypertensive infusions and administration of as-needed hypertension medications. Out of 410 screened patients, 66 were included (median age 53.7 years, 43.9% female). Patients were at maximum nicardipine dose (15 mg/hr) when clevidipine was initiated in 91% of cases. Among those included, 77.3% of patients were unable to achieve goal blood pressure while on nicardipine therapy. Goal blood pressure was able to be achieved within 1 hour in 84.8% of patients receiving clevidipine. Adverse effects were minimal, with only 4 (6%) patients experiencing hypotension and 4 (6%) patients developing tachycardia within 12hrs of clevidipine initiation. The median duration of clevidipine infusion was 23.9 hours. Clevidipine appears to be an effective, safe alternative agent in patients that are unable to achieve blood pressure goals with nicardipine infusion. Future prospective, multicenter studies are needed to validate these findings and assess long-term neurological outcomes. Clinicians managing nicardipine-refractory hypertension in neurocritically ill patients may consider clevidipine as a structured second-line option pending such evidence.

氯维地平治疗神经危重症患者尼卡地平抵抗性高血压。
急性高血压在急性脑损伤中很常见,并导致发病率和死亡率增加。治疗急性高血压的最佳药物尚不清楚,尽管神经重症监护室(Neuro ICU)的大多数危重患者都将尼卡地平作为一线药物进行治疗。如果使用最大剂量的尼卡地平仍不能充分控制高血压,那么几乎没有其他药物既安全又有效。克利维地平可能是治疗尼卡地平难治性高血压的最佳药物。这项回顾性队列研究包括急性脑损伤患者,尽管使用了最大剂量的尼卡地平,但仍无法达到血压目标,转而使用克利夫地平。主要结局是评估在开始使用克利夫地平后1小时内达到收缩压目标的患者百分比。次要结果包括低血压,需要血管加压剂和心动过速的发展。其他结果包括抗高血压输注的持续时间和按需服用高血压药物。在410例筛查患者中,66例纳入(中位年龄53.7岁,43.9%为女性)。当91%的病例开始使用克利夫地平时,患者的尼卡地平剂量最大(15mg /hr)。在纳入的患者中,77.3%的患者在尼卡地平治疗期间无法达到目标血压。84.8%的患者接受克瑞地平治疗后1小时内血压达到目标。不良反应最小,只有4例(6%)患者出现低血压,4例(6%)患者在开始使用氯地平的12小时内出现心动过速。克利夫地平输注的中位持续时间为23.9小时。对于无法通过尼卡地平输注达到血压目标的患者,克利维地平似乎是一种有效、安全的替代药物。未来需要前瞻性的多中心研究来验证这些发现并评估长期神经学结果。临床医生处理神经危重症患者的尼卡地平难治性高血压时,可能会考虑将克利夫地平作为有组织的二线治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书