Orexin Signaling, Glymphatic Clearance, and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review and Hypothesis-Generating Conceptual Framework.

IF 1.9
Ghassan Sonji, Nada Sonji, Afaf El Katerji
{"title":"Orexin Signaling, Glymphatic Clearance, and Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: A Scoping Review and Hypothesis-Generating Conceptual Framework.","authors":"Ghassan Sonji, Nada Sonji, Afaf El Katerji","doi":"10.2174/0115672050487100260727051112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sleep fragmentation is associated with preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and may precede cognitive symptoms by years. Sleep disruption is a factor amenable to objective assessment. Evidence suggests that fragmented sleep impairs the brain's glymphatic clearance system, promoting amyloid-beta and tau accumulation. This raises the possibility that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) may influence sleep-related processes in preclinical AD, though direct human evidence is lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study conducted a PRISMA-ScR scoping review from 2012 to June 2025 evaluating plasma p-tau217, Aβ42/40 ratios, DTI-ALPS, sleep architecture, and APOE ε4 genotype. This study assessed evidence quality using an exploratory confidence-rating approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In some transgenic AD models, orexin antagonism reduced amyloid plaque burden. Human data remain limited. In a randomized placebo-controlled four-week trial involving 285 participants with probable AD dementia and insomnia, suvorexant significantly increased total sleep time relative to placebo. However, biomarker changes, glymphatic function, and long-term cognitive outcomes were not evaluated. Thus, current evidence for disease-modifying effects in humans is very limited and uncertain.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Whether DORAs influence glymphatic clearance in humans remains unknown. One untested mechanistic question concerns the role of noradrenergic vascular pulsations during sleep. Future trials should incorporate integrated endpoints including fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging, and sleep physiology.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preclinical findings remain preliminary and lack human validation. This review maps existing biomarker literature to generate mechanistic hypotheses; no integrative risk model, threshold combination, or stratification tool is proposed. Mechanistic proof-of-concept studies must precede any consideration of larger trials or translational application.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050487100260727051112","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sleep fragmentation is associated with preclinical Alzheimer's disease (AD) and may precede cognitive symptoms by years. Sleep disruption is a factor amenable to objective assessment. Evidence suggests that fragmented sleep impairs the brain's glymphatic clearance system, promoting amyloid-beta and tau accumulation. This raises the possibility that dual orexin receptor antagonists (DORAs) may influence sleep-related processes in preclinical AD, though direct human evidence is lacking.

Methods: This study conducted a PRISMA-ScR scoping review from 2012 to June 2025 evaluating plasma p-tau217, Aβ42/40 ratios, DTI-ALPS, sleep architecture, and APOE ε4 genotype. This study assessed evidence quality using an exploratory confidence-rating approach.

Results: In some transgenic AD models, orexin antagonism reduced amyloid plaque burden. Human data remain limited. In a randomized placebo-controlled four-week trial involving 285 participants with probable AD dementia and insomnia, suvorexant significantly increased total sleep time relative to placebo. However, biomarker changes, glymphatic function, and long-term cognitive outcomes were not evaluated. Thus, current evidence for disease-modifying effects in humans is very limited and uncertain.

Discussion: Whether DORAs influence glymphatic clearance in humans remains unknown. One untested mechanistic question concerns the role of noradrenergic vascular pulsations during sleep. Future trials should incorporate integrated endpoints including fluid biomarkers, neuroimaging, and sleep physiology.

Conclusion: Preclinical findings remain preliminary and lack human validation. This review maps existing biomarker literature to generate mechanistic hypotheses; no integrative risk model, threshold combination, or stratification tool is proposed. Mechanistic proof-of-concept studies must precede any consideration of larger trials or translational application.

食欲素信号,淋巴清除和临床前阿尔茨海默病:一个范围审查和假设生成的概念框架。
睡眠片段化与临床前阿尔茨海默病(AD)有关,可能早于认知症状数年。睡眠中断是一个可以客观评估的因素。有证据表明,零碎的睡眠会损害大脑的淋巴清除系统,促进淀粉样蛋白和tau蛋白的积累。这就提出了双重食欲素受体拮抗剂(DORAs)可能影响临床前AD睡眠相关过程的可能性,尽管缺乏直接的人类证据。方法:本研究对2012年至2025年6月的血浆p-tau217、a - β42/40比值、DTI-ALPS、睡眠结构和APOE ε4基因型进行了PRISMA-ScR范围综述。本研究采用探索性置信度评价方法评估证据质量。结果:在一些转基因AD模型中,食欲素拮抗剂可减轻淀粉样斑块负荷。人类数据仍然有限。在一项为期四周的随机安慰剂对照试验中,285名可能患有阿尔茨海默氏症痴呆和失眠症的参与者发现,与安慰剂相比,抗抑郁药显著增加了总睡眠时间。然而,未评估生物标志物变化、淋巴功能和长期认知结果。因此,目前对人类疾病改善作用的证据非常有限和不确定。讨论:DORAs是否影响人类淋巴清除仍然未知。一个未经测试的机制问题涉及睡眠期间去肾上腺素能血管搏动的作用。未来的试验应纳入包括液体生物标志物、神经影像学和睡眠生理学在内的综合终点。结论:临床前研究结果仍然是初步的,缺乏人体验证。本文回顾了现有的生物标志物文献,以产生机制假设;没有提出综合风险模型、阈值组合或分层工具。机械的概念验证研究必须先于任何大规模试验或转化应用的考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书