Addressing the landscape of diabetes care within community nursing: Learning from a Sussex-based service evaluation.

IF 3.4
Jonathan Golding, Penelope Hamilton-Evans, Victoria Marlow, David Lipscomb
{"title":"Addressing the landscape of diabetes care within community nursing: Learning from a Sussex-based service evaluation.","authors":"Jonathan Golding, Penelope Hamilton-Evans, Victoria Marlow, David Lipscomb","doi":"10.1111/dme.70467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Well-established provision in the United Kingdom offers insulin administration for those who are unable to self-manage. An ageing population is increasing pressure on community nursing teams, with many reporting unsustainable workloads. This service evaluation sought to review the community nursing workload of one community trust.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The electronic records of all those receiving community nursing care for insulin administration were reviewed. Data extracted included age, ethnicity, frailty score (Clinical Frailty Scale), presence of dementia, whether the person is a care home resident, insulin regimen, number of daily nurse visits, HbA1c, and where available, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. CGM data were compared by insulin regimen and diabetes type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Searches identified 499 cases; 410 were eligible for analysis. Participants with type 1 diabetes were younger and less frail than those with type 2 diabetes, with more nursing visits per day. Median hypoglycaemia was low (0.0 in both groups), but median time-above-range was high regardless of diabetes type (60 in type 1 diabetes, 62 in type 2 diabetes) and insulin regimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This service evaluation uncovered evidence of high workload for community nursing teams. Commissioners should recognise this and the potential for future increases in workload with an ageing population. Glucose control was sub-optimal but hypoglycaemia rates were low. Consideration should be given to ways to improve care. Options include involving carers in insulin administration, using longer acting insulins, and greater use of diabetes technology. Research into these strategies will help future proof this service and prevent widening of health inequalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":520603,"journal":{"name":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","volume":" ","pages":"e70467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dme.70467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Well-established provision in the United Kingdom offers insulin administration for those who are unable to self-manage. An ageing population is increasing pressure on community nursing teams, with many reporting unsustainable workloads. This service evaluation sought to review the community nursing workload of one community trust.

Methods: The electronic records of all those receiving community nursing care for insulin administration were reviewed. Data extracted included age, ethnicity, frailty score (Clinical Frailty Scale), presence of dementia, whether the person is a care home resident, insulin regimen, number of daily nurse visits, HbA1c, and where available, continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) data. CGM data were compared by insulin regimen and diabetes type.

Results: Searches identified 499 cases; 410 were eligible for analysis. Participants with type 1 diabetes were younger and less frail than those with type 2 diabetes, with more nursing visits per day. Median hypoglycaemia was low (0.0 in both groups), but median time-above-range was high regardless of diabetes type (60 in type 1 diabetes, 62 in type 2 diabetes) and insulin regimen.

Conclusion: This service evaluation uncovered evidence of high workload for community nursing teams. Commissioners should recognise this and the potential for future increases in workload with an ageing population. Glucose control was sub-optimal but hypoglycaemia rates were low. Consideration should be given to ways to improve care. Options include involving carers in insulin administration, using longer acting insulins, and greater use of diabetes technology. Research into these strategies will help future proof this service and prevent widening of health inequalities.

解决社区护理中的糖尿病护理景观:从基于苏塞克斯的服务评估中学习。
目的:英国完善的规定为那些无法自我管理的人提供胰岛素管理。人口老龄化给社区护理团队带来了越来越大的压力,许多人报告说工作量难以承受。这项服务评估旨在审查一个社区信托的社区护理工作量。方法:对所有接受胰岛素社区护理的患者的电子病历进行回顾性分析。提取的数据包括年龄、种族、衰弱评分(临床衰弱量表)、痴呆的存在、患者是否在养老院居住、胰岛素治疗方案、每日护士就诊次数、HbA1c以及可用的连续血糖监测(CGM)数据。CGM数据按胰岛素治疗方案和糖尿病类型进行比较。结果:检索发现499例;有410例符合分析条件。1型糖尿病患者比2型糖尿病患者更年轻,身体不那么虚弱,每天的护理次数更多。中位低血糖很低(两组均为0.0),但无论糖尿病类型(1型糖尿病为60,2型糖尿病为62)和胰岛素治疗方案,中位时间高于范围都很高。结论:本服务评估揭示了社区护理团队高工作量的证据。专员们应该认识到这一点,以及未来随着人口老龄化而增加工作量的可能性。血糖控制不理想,但低血糖率很低。应考虑改善护理的方法。选择包括让护理人员参与胰岛素管理,使用长效胰岛素,以及更多地使用糖尿病技术。对这些战略的研究将有助于今后证明这项服务,并防止保健不平等现象的扩大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书